Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ROTHENBERGER: Elected leaders sometimes they pass the test sometimes they fail. Sometimes, too, vision is as much about saying no to something as saying yes



ONE OF THE TOUGHEST QUESTIONS we ask our politicians is, “What is your vision for Kamloops?

More often than not, the response has something to do with a clean, safe city with good amenities and well-paying jobs. When was the last time a politician said, “I really think we need more street crime, litter and graffiti, and we should bring in more minimum-wage employment and close down some parks”?

The real test of vision, though, comes in the details.

Elected leaders and residents alike are asked from time to time to put their money where their vision is. Sometimes they pass the test, sometimes they fail. Sometimes, too, vision is as much about saying no to something as saying yes.

Image Credit ... kamloopspublicmarket.org
The proposed farmer’s market building at the entrance to Riverside Park is one such vision that divides people. An informal survey was released this week on what people think about it and I’ll get to that in a minute. First, though, a few examples of vision, and lack of it, throughout the history of Kamloops.

I wrote a couple of days ago about how, if councils over the past 15 years had retained the vision of the council that came before them, the question of what to do about the City Hall building that experts say needs replacing would have been answered. A brand new one would have been pretty much bought and paid for and plans would be underway for construction to begin without need of a referendum.

There’s another example in the performing arts centre (PAC).


There’s much talk about the need for the arts community to lead the way in advocating for a new PAC. If that same arts community had not opposed a new PAC in 2003, and had not insisted on putting $2 million into renovations of Sagebrush Theatre instead, Kamloops would have had a new PAC long ago. But the main players in the arts community couldn’t look into the future. They didn’t want to let go of what they already had, which was the Sagebrush. The estimated cost of a new PAC back then? Around $15 million.

Here’s another fail — parking for the Sandman Centre arena. The City once owned the property on which the Sandman Inn now sits. It was supposed to be for parking, and would have resolved the shortage created by the lack of vision when the arena was built. Instead of holding onto it, the City sold it for the Sandman Inn with no requirements that any of it be kept for public parking.

But there have been outstanding examples of visionary successes, as well. The Tournament Capital Centre (TCC) and McArthur Island are among them.

McArthur Island was once a weed-infested piece of land that didn’t fit into anyone’s vision of what Kamloops should become. But then, somebody came along and proposed that it could become a big sports venue, with playing fields, a curling rink and a hockey arena, and it was done. Many years after that, it became pivotal to the creation of the Tournament Capital facilities. A referendum proposed a field-house and new fields on Thompson Rivers University land, and a major expansion at McArthur Island.

In a giant leap of faith, taxpayers approved borrowing the money, and we now have the TCC and the McArthur Island Sports and Events Centre (formerly the McArthur Island Sports Centre).
These facilities serve residents way beyond what other cities the size of Kamloops enjoy, and bring in more than a hundred tournaments a year. The model has been copied by cities across the country.

That’s vision.

A great example of another kind of vision was the rejection by the community of the proposed Ajax mine. One of the biggest components of failed vision is the temptation to look at short-term benefits — often in the form of jobs and profits — rather than long-term consequences and opportunities. Kamloops chose the future. Senior governments said no for various reasons around the science of the project but, ultimately, the fundamental reason was that it wouldn’t be good for Kamloops.

Now for the Kamloops Public Market proposed for the parking area in front of Heritage House at Riverside Park. My views are already known.

Riverside Park was once a sawmill owned by James McIntosh, a legendary developer known as the “King of Kamloops” in the early days. When the mill burned down in 1901, the City snapped up the land and turned it into a public park. Imagine Kamloops if the City fathers of the day — Mayor M.P. Gordon and his council — had not had the vision to establish Riverside Park. Imagine a sawmill churning out lumber down at what is now the band-shell area.

Those who want the City to gift the land for construction of a public market see that as visionary, too. I don’t, but not everyone’s vision is the same. The society driving the proposal released the results of an online survey this week that shows 368 of the 827 who answered it object to Riverside Park as the location. A press release went on to say 459 were either in favour or were undecided.

But how many of those 459 were in favour? Turns out it was 375. The difference between 368 and 375 is what’s known in the polling business as statistically insignificant.

So, the denizens of Kamloops, including City council, face another conundrum of vision. Which vision will prevail? What would Mayor Gordon say?

In 1987, voters turned down borrowing $10 million toward the $50 million Waterfront Centre at the park. The slogan for the yes campaign was “Share the vision.” Voters didn’t share it.

Many years later, they turned up in force to reject a waterfront hotel in front of the arena. Later, they said no to a parkade where the Public Market is proposed.

Vision is just another word for looking ahead. Sometimes we see what could be; sometimes we don’t.



Mel Rothenburger was born and grew up in Oliver, B.C. Following high school he attended college in Wenatchee, Wash. and graduated from the University of Washington in Seattle.

After working as a newspaper journalist in other parts of B.C. he joined The Kamloops Daily News. Mel served as chair of the Kamloops-Thompson School Board and, from 1999-2005, as Mayor of Kamloops.

As mayor, he led the Tournament Capital Centre and Centre for Water Quality projects, initiated and completed the McDonald Park Community Project, as well as many others, and sat on the TNRD board for six years. After retiring as Mayor he returned to The Daily News, from which he retired in 2012. He has been the TNRD Director, for Electoral Area P, since 2014.

He can be reached at
mrothenburger@armchairmayor.ca.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more