’20 for 2020’ ... instead of some attempting to build society into a model of their own choosing, there needs to be an open dialogue and sharing of beliefs and opinions
Well, we are down to the
final two days in our series “20 for 2020” ... and on day number 19, comes a
thought from Garret Seinen.
As human beings, the
most significant problem we face today is the same problem faced by our
ancestors throughout history - how can we be certain a particular thing is true
or false. How can we know when we’re being misled?
Each of us, as individuals, must be able to see what to reject, and what to accept, in order to get the most out of life ... to use our time to support things we won’t later regret ... and to avoid looking back at life and saying “I’d have done better if I’d realized ‘that’ was nothing but a lie”.
Each of us, as individuals, must be able to see what to reject, and what to accept, in order to get the most out of life ... to use our time to support things we won’t later regret ... and to avoid looking back at life and saying “I’d have done better if I’d realized ‘that’ was nothing but a lie”.
When a government tells
us that our country has ‘no identity’, should we believe that? In my opinion, that is a
blatant distortion of the truth, and so in fact I believe we are being misled.
When we are told that
humanity faces extinction in ‘X’ number of years, and government does little or
nothing to dissuade that belief, should we believe it?
Should we be free to
question whether or not we are seeing global warming, or to ask to what degree
it is happening?
Government tells us we
need to pay a ‘price on pollution’ (carbon tax) as part of its climate action
plan, to protect our health and our communities. If that is indeed reality, should it not be fair game then to ask why
imported petroleum products are not similarly taxed?
A pipeline across
northern BC is okay, safe, and fine for the environment says the government -- and yet one from Alberta to the BC’s lower mainland is not.
Are the
words and actions of the government misleading? Which of these two statements is false? Which
statement, if any, do we reject?
Again, from Garret comes
the question, “Is it harmful to hold incorrect ideas?”.
Of course, it’s personally harmful to hold ideas as true, when those ideas turn out to be false; mistakes are never helpful to an individual. Today however, there are many who believe exposing people to ideas, which they disagree with, is dangerous to society.
So, do we ban the ‘free
speech’ of those we disagree with? The
answer should be a resounding, NO!
Instead
of some attempting to build society into a model of their own choosing,
there needs to be an open dialogue and sharing of beliefs and opinions ... and why those beliefs and
opinions are held. The reality is, the ideas of an individual or group need
to be seen as better than those of another individual or group, before
followers can be gained.
I know it’s too much to
ask, however it really is a shame that politics has become so polarized, rather
than accepting that others may have ideas which can work.
Groups, organizations,
politicians, political parties, working together? We can only hope.
And
with just one more day to go, here are the suggestions, to this point, on “20
for 2020” ...
#3 … there should be a full
review of all license costs and fees, which the provincial government has
imposed upon us, to see where and how they are being used
Comments
Post a Comment