Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

’20 for 2020’ ... instead of some attempting to build society into a model of their own choosing, there needs to be an open dialogue and sharing of beliefs and opinions


Well, we are down to the final two days in our series “20 for 2020” ... and on day number 19, comes a thought from Garret Seinen. 

As human beings, the most significant problem we face today is the same problem faced by our ancestors throughout history - how can we be certain a particular thing is true or false.  How can we know when we’re being misled?

Each of us, as individuals, must be able to see what to reject, and what to accept,  in order to get the most out of life ... to use our time to support things we won’t later regret ... and to avoid looking back at life and saying “I’d have done better if I’d realized ‘that’ was nothing but a lie”
.

When a government tells us that our country has ‘no identity’, should we believe that? In my opinion, that is a blatant distortion of the truth, and so in fact I believe we are being misled.

When we are told that humanity faces extinction in ‘X’ number of years, and government does little or nothing to dissuade that belief, should we believe it?

Should we be free to question whether or not we are seeing global warming, or to ask to what degree it is happening?

Government tells us we need to pay a ‘price on pollution’ (carbon tax) as part of its climate action plan, to protect our health and our communities.  If that is indeed reality, should it not be fair game then to ask why imported petroleum products are not similarly taxed? 

A pipeline across northern BC is okay, safe, and fine for the environment says the government -- and yet one from Alberta to the BC’s lower mainland is not.

Are the words and actions of the government misleading?  Which of these two statements is false? Which statement, if any, do we reject?

Again, from Garret comes the question, “Is it harmful to hold incorrect ideas?”.

Of course, it’s personally harmful to hold ideas as true, when those ideas turn out to be false; mistakes are never helpful to an individual. Today however, there are many who believe exposing people to ideas, which they disagree with, is dangerous to society. 

So, do we ban the ‘free speech’ of those we disagree with? The answer should be a resounding, NO!

Instead of some attempting to build society into a model of their own choosing, there needs to be an open dialogue and sharing of beliefs and opinions ... and why those beliefs and opinions are held. The reality is, the ideas of an individual or group need to be seen as better than those of another individual or group, before followers can be gained.

I know it’s too much to ask, however it really is a shame that politics has become so polarized, rather than accepting that others may have ideas which can work.

Groups, organizations, politicians, political parties, working together? We can only hope.


And with just one more day to go, here are the suggestions, to this point, on “20 for 2020” ...

#3 … there should be a full review of all license costs and fees, which the provincial government has imposed upon us, to see where and how they are being used











Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more