Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

David Eby has forgotten the NDP government, of which he is a part of, has had plenty of opportunity to make changes to legal services long before now


On Thursday, Attorney General David Eby dropped by Kamloops to let us know that the provincial government was, in his words ... delivering on its commitment to enhance access to justice for British Columbians ... and that they were providing ... a $250,000 grant to establish a new legal clinic at the Kamloops and District Elizabeth Fry Society.


Of course, he couldn’t, and wouldn’t, miss the opportunity to blame the previous Liberal government for all of the woes in the those in financial hardship from accessing assistance in legal matters. 

“Cuts to legal aid by the previous government meant that often times residents of the Kamloops area had to seek legal assistance and advice over the phone with lawyers in Vancouver, if they could find help at all,” said Eby.

According to the government media release, the grant (my bold italics), which was awarded through the Law Foundation of BC, is part of a $2-million commitment by government that will support eight advocacy clinics in the province to hire experienced lawyers and staff who can offer legal advice to their clients and act as legal counsel in proceedings. The foundation will provide coaching, tools and support to enhance the services provided by the society, all at no cost to their clients.

Here's the thing --- once again this is a GRANT to establish the legal clinic in Kamloops, as well as 7 others they are / have set up.


What will happen in a year from now – in two years – or whenever the grant runs out?


They’ll have to go, cap in hand, to ask for something that should instead be funded on an ongoing basis; they should not have to wonder where the money is going to come from, so that they are able to continue providing this much needed service.

Once again, I feel it necessary to remind people that a seven percent sales tax, was added to legal fees, for the express purpose of funding legal aid. Just to confirm that statement, here is what the BC Chamber of Commerce itself stated back in 2017.

“In 1992, with the claim that the funds would be utilized to fund legal aid, Finance Minister Glen Clark of the NDP introduced a retail sales tax, now levied pursuant to sections 126 to 127 of the Provincial Sales Tax Act of B.C. (formerly, the Social Service Tax of B.C.), both as amended from time to time (“PST”) at the rate of 7% of the purchase price of any legal services provided in BC or to a BC resident. With the sole exception of legal aid, PST applies to all legal services provided to individuals and businesses.”

What else did the BC Chamber have to say?


“Only ½ for Legal Aid. While it was implied that the tax was to fund the laudable goal of access to justice for the impoverished, of the approximately $12 million a month that the Provincial Government collects from the 7% PST on legal services, only “slightly more than half” is actually spent on legal aid.[4] In 2009, of the $144.8 million collected of PST on legal services, only $80 million was actually allocated to legal aid for disadvantaged British Columbians”.

BC Attorney General David Eby is right when he says, “Navigating the justice system can be a costly and stressful experience, particularly for the most vulnerable residents of our province”.

He is only marginally correct however in the statement he also made ... “This funding sends a clear message that our government is helping ensure that all British Columbians are able to access the legal assistance they require whenever they need it.”

If indeed they are willing to help ensure that ‘all British Columbians are able to access the legal assistance they require whenever they need it’ , then they need to make this a long-term commitment.

The tax on legal services, as originally intended, must fully provide for legal services to those unable to afford it!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more