Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

David Eby has forgotten the NDP government, of which he is a part of, has had plenty of opportunity to make changes to legal services long before now


On Thursday, Attorney General David Eby dropped by Kamloops to let us know that the provincial government was, in his words ... delivering on its commitment to enhance access to justice for British Columbians ... and that they were providing ... a $250,000 grant to establish a new legal clinic at the Kamloops and District Elizabeth Fry Society.


Of course, he couldn’t, and wouldn’t, miss the opportunity to blame the previous Liberal government for all of the woes in the those in financial hardship from accessing assistance in legal matters. 

Cuts to legal aid by the previous government meant that often times residents of the Kamloops area had to seek legal assistance and advice over the phone with lawyers in Vancouver, if they could find help at all,” said Eby.

According to the government media release, the grant (my bold italics), which was awarded through the Law Foundation of BC, is part of a $2-million commitment by government that will support eight advocacy clinics in the province to hire experienced lawyers and staff who can offer legal advice to their clients and act as legal counsel in proceedings. The foundation will provide coaching, tools and support to enhance the services provided by the society, all at no cost to their clients.

Here's the thing --- once again this is a GRANT to establish the legal clinic in Kamloops, as well as 7 others they are / have set up.


What will happen in a year from now – in two years – or whenever the grant runs out?


They’ll have to go, cap in hand, to ask for something that should instead be funded on an ongoing basis; they should not have to wonder where the money is going to come from, so that they are able to continue providing this much needed service.

Once again, I feel it necessary to remind people that a seven percent sales tax, was added to legal fees, for the express purpose of funding legal aid. Just to confirm that statement, here is what the BC Chamber of Commerce itself stated back in 2017.

In 1992, with the claim that the funds would be utilized to fund legal aid, Finance Minister Glen Clark of the NDP introduced a retail sales tax, now levied pursuant to sections 126 to 127 of the Provincial Sales Tax Act of B.C. (formerly, the Social Service Tax of B.C.), both as amended from time to time (“PST”) at the rate of 7% of the purchase price of any legal services provided in BC or to a BC resident. With the sole exception of legal aid, PST applies to all legal services provided to individuals and businesses.”

What else did the BC Chamber have to say?


Only ½ for Legal Aid. While it was implied that the tax was to fund the laudable goal of access to justice for the impoverished, of the approximately $12 million a month that the Provincial Government collects from the 7% PST on legal services, only “slightly more than half” is actually spent on legal aid.[4] In 2009, of the $144.8 million collected of PST on legal services, only $80 million was actually allocated to legal aid for disadvantaged British Columbians”.

BC Attorney General David Eby is right when he says, “Navigating the justice system can be a costly and stressful experience, particularly for the most vulnerable residents of our province”.

He is only marginally correct however in the statement he also made ... “This funding sends a clear message that our government is helping ensure that all British Columbians are able to access the legal assistance they require whenever they need it.”

If indeed they are willing to help ensure that ‘all British Columbians are able to access the legal assistance they require whenever they need it’ , then they need to make this a long-term commitment.

The tax on legal services, as originally intended, must fully provide for legal services to those unable to afford it!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more