Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

January 3rd -- here’s day number three of ‘20 for 2020’


It’s Friday, January 3rd, and that means its time for the third thought, or idea, from my list of “20 for 2020”. For those who are just joining us, these are twenty ideas being presented over the first 20 days of the year … ideas which I believe should be implemented by any political party in British Columbia which wishes to govern us.

On Wednesday we started out with something paraphrased from the BC Conservatives in which I stated that … those who wish to lead, should acknowledge that government must be about people.

Then yesterday, I suggested a need for … a review of services provided to areas and regions where much of the provinces revenues are collected from.

Now, here is suggestion number three … there should be a full review of all license costs and fees, which the provincial government has imposed upon us, to see where and how they are being used.

For example, are the monies collected for hunting and fishing licenses being used in their entirety for the protection of their environment, for reproduction enhancement, and to ensure the health of species?

Where do the recycling fees imposed on batteries, tires, electronics, and appliances go … how is this money used?


The provincial sales tax (PST) was imposed on legal services a number of years ago; government essentially implied this revenue source would be used to fund Legal Aid, and to provide better and more consistent services.  This still has not happened as government siphons a portion of it off to be used for other purposes.

The government imposes many charges and fees upon us through-out the year, but where does that money really go?  The majority goes towards whatever the government of the day decides to spend it on – that’s wrong.

Either fund whatever the money has been collected for, and if more is raised than required, then reduce the costs to us. If not?  Well they’ve done nothing more than impose a tax on us for whatever use they decide. Again, that’s wrong.

That’s three down … seventeen more to go … with “20 for 2020”.  If you have an idea to contribute, let me know, and I’ll see if I can work it in.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more