Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Obviously, there are concerns about vulnerable people and ensuring protection of conscience rights, which will be issues she (Conservative MP Cathy McLeod) will be watching for


This afternoon (January 13th) Conservative MP Cathy McLeod, advised residents of her Kamloops – Thompson – Cariboo riding, of the launch of a public consultation being conducted by the federal government.  The consultation is to get feedback on how to best to respond to a Quebec Supreme Court ruling  ruling, which recently concluded it was unconstitutional to limit access to medical assistance in dying (MAID).


On September 11, 2019 the Superior Court of Quebec ruled it was unconstitutional to only allow those who are already near death, to seek medical assistance to end their suffering. This ruling technically only applied in Quebec, but because the government has declined to appeal the decision, any amendments will apply across the country.

Since the September ruling, the Prime Minister (Justin Trudeau) has stated that he accepts the court ruling and will amend the federal law accordingly,” said McLeod.

Under the court ruling, it has until March to amend the law. I suspect that the government will have to ask for an extension, six weeks is not sufficient to meet the courts deadline.”

And amendments, and a loosening of the law, were very much what many had predicated would happen should government open the door to assisted suicide. In fact, many questioned whether our country would simply end up with a situation where anyone would be able to take their own life, when for reasons they believed their life to be intolerable to live, they would be able to end it.

Since medical assistance in dying was legalized, more than 6,700 Canadians, who were suffering unbearably (a term elected by government to use) have chosen to die peacefully (again a description chosen by government) with the help of a physician or nurse practitioner.

With the Superior Court of Québec decision (Truchon v. Attorney General of Canada) that it was unconstitutional to limit access to MAID, for people nearing the end of life, an online survey is now being conducted to allow each of us opportunity to offer our views on how the law should be amended.  The online questionnaire, being conducted by the Department of Justice will be available until January 27th.

According to MP Cathy McLeod, the answers to this questionnaire will be used not only in responding to the Quebec court ruling but as part of a parliamentary review of the law that is to begin this summer. 

The questionnaire, according to McLeod, asks people to consider what safeguards should be in place to prevent abuse if the foreseeable death requirement is removed.

It asks if MAID should be expanded to include whether mature minors and those suffering from mental illnesses should be eligible.

Further, people who fear losing their mental capacity should be able to make advance requests for medical assistance in dying.

I asked McLeod about what her thoughts on whether there should be limits to access to assistance in dying. 


Her office responded by stating, “Until we see the legislation, it will be difficult for Cathy to provide a specific position on the issue”.

As with past MAID legislation, Cathy will be looking for feedback from the riding. Obviously, there are concerns about vulnerable people and ensuring protection of conscience rights, which will be issues she will be watching for”.

And as for whether this would be a situation where the Conservative Party would allow their MPs a free vote in parliament?

Her office responded stating that, “The Conservatives have always allowed free votes on matters of conscience, so once she has all the information at hand, she will move forward with her position on the proposed legislation”.

For her part, McLeod is encouraging constituents to take part in the online questionnaire, however, she stated:

If you need some more time to reflect, please feel free to share your thoughts with me in the coming months”.  She then concluded, “With an issue as profoundly important and serious I think it is an insult to give Canadians 14 days for input.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more