Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Obviously, there are concerns about vulnerable people and ensuring protection of conscience rights, which will be issues she (Conservative MP Cathy McLeod) will be watching for


This afternoon (January 13th) Conservative MP Cathy McLeod, advised residents of her Kamloops – Thompson – Cariboo riding, of the launch of a public consultation being conducted by the federal government.  The consultation is to get feedback on how to best to respond to a Quebec Supreme Court ruling  ruling, which recently concluded it was unconstitutional to limit access to medical assistance in dying (MAID).


On September 11, 2019 the Superior Court of Quebec ruled it was unconstitutional to only allow those who are already near death, to seek medical assistance to end their suffering. This ruling technically only applied in Quebec, but because the government has declined to appeal the decision, any amendments will apply across the country.

“Since the September ruling, the Prime Minister (Justin Trudeau) has stated that he accepts the court ruling and will amend the federal law accordingly,” said McLeod.

“Under the court ruling, it has until March to amend the law. I suspect that the government will have to ask for an extension, six weeks is not sufficient to meet the courts deadline.”

And amendments, and a loosening of the law, were very much what many had predicated would happen should government open the door to assisted suicide. In fact, many questioned whether our country would simply end up with a situation where anyone would be able to take their own life, when for reasons they believed their life to be intolerable to live, they would be able to end it.

Since medical assistance in dying was legalized, more than 6,700 Canadians, who were suffering unbearably (a term elected by government to use) have chosen to die peacefully (again a description chosen by government) with the help of a physician or nurse practitioner.

With the Superior Court of Québec decision (Truchon v. Attorney General of Canada) that it was unconstitutional to limit access to MAID, for people nearing the end of life, an online survey is now being conducted to allow each of us opportunity to offer our views on how the law should be amended.  The online questionnaire, being conducted by the Department of Justice will be available until January 27th.

According to MP Cathy McLeod, the answers to this questionnaire will be used not only in responding to the Quebec court ruling but as part of a parliamentary review of the law that is to begin this summer. 

The questionnaire, according to McLeod, asks people to consider what safeguards should be in place to prevent abuse if the foreseeable death requirement is removed.

It asks if MAID should be expanded to include whether mature minors and those suffering from mental illnesses should be eligible.

Further, people who fear losing their mental capacity should be able to make advance requests for medical assistance in dying.

I asked McLeod about what her thoughts on whether there should be limits to access to assistance in dying. 


Her office responded by stating, “Until we see the legislation, it will be difficult for Cathy to provide a specific position on the issue”.

“As with past MAID legislation, Cathy will be looking for feedback from the riding. Obviously, there are concerns about vulnerable people and ensuring protection of conscience rights, which will be issues she will be watching for”.

And as for whether this would be a situation where the Conservative Party would allow their MPs a free vote in parliament?

Her office responded stating that, “The Conservatives have always allowed free votes on matters of conscience, so once she has all the information at hand, she will move forward with her position on the proposed legislation”.

For her part, McLeod is encouraging constituents to take part in the online questionnaire, however, she stated:

“If you need some more time to reflect, please feel free to share your thoughts with me in the coming months”.  She then concluded, “With an issue as profoundly important and serious I think it is an insult to give Canadians 14 days for input.”
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more