Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

‘20 for 2020’ ... Soberly audit the health ministry with a mind to make adult decisions for the long-term betterment of our health and care


Good morning again, and welcome to day number 10 of our series of “20 for 2020”.  Nothing seems to get voters more piqued then when the topic of health care comes up – it’s definitely a flash point!

No wonder then that when I asked for any thoughts or idea people might have for this series, health care in BC topped the list.



According to one individual ... the health ministry currently consumes a majority of the budget (and it's growing by the minute) and they have poorer quality care and longer wait times to show for it.

Another stated ... the question should be to soberly audit the industry with a mind to make adult decisions for the long-term betterment of our health and care instead of tinkering with trivial and ultimately ineffective bits of regulation or quotas.

While yet another commented that ... it's not in the best interest of the growing number of afflicted and distressed to continue to suffer in wait lines resulting from bureaucratic or regulatory sandbagging.

According to a Vancouver Sun story from last February, the BC Ministry of Health will spend ... about $21 billion in the 2019 / 20 fiscal year, $21.5 billion in 2020/21 and $22.1 billion in 2021 / 22. The 2018 / 2019 budget was $19.8 billion. Those figures don’t include the $10 million allocated to the Ministry of Mental Health and Additions in each of the next three fiscal periods.

The provincial Ministry of Health accounts for nearly 40 percent of BC’s budget, and yet the outcomes for the people of BC are always under question.  A few more MRI’s and hip replacements just aren’t going to cut it.

A full study on where and how over twenty billion dollars a year is being spent needs to be undertaken ... new options and procedures studied ... possible long-term savings to be considered in providing all immunization’s and vaccines at no- charge to the public -- HPV, Shingles, and the flu shot are just three which should be considered.


Just looking at the flu shot as one example; according to a CBC News story the flu vaccine in Ontario has been free for two decades, and vaccination rates "massively increased" from 18 per cent to 42 per cent when it became free. 

According to Ontario-based physician and researcher Dr. Iris Gorfinkel ... "You pay for more clinic visits, emergency room visits and you pay for more hospitalizations.

When we look at the cost efficacy of flu vaccinations, it is the best deal going in health care."

We need to find out where more ‘best deals’ in health care can be found, not just to save money or make it go farther – but to actually provide better health care overall.

That’s it for today ... #10 in our series of “20 for 2020” ... I hope you’ll join us again tomorrow.

Just a reminder that if you have missed any of the previous ideas and suggestions, from “20 for 2020”, you can catch up at the following links:

#1 … those who wish to lead, should acknowledge that government must be about people.

#2 … a review of services provided to areas and regions where much of the provinces revenues are collected from.

#3 … there should be a full review of all license costs and fees, which the provincial government has imposed upon us, to see where and how they are being used

#4 ... we need a permanent fix to the problem of keeping medical practitioners in some of the more rural areas of the province

#5 ... put an immediate end to the Community Benefits Agreement

#6 ... the next BC government must be committed to sustainable resource development

#7 ... government should make treatment for chronic conditions free to residents

#8 … new schools should be designed to incorporate community uses as identified by the areas they are to be located

#9 ... Bids submitted to build future ferries will include not just the lowest submission that meets structural requirements, but will also include the financial benefits of building in BC
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more