Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

SURVEY SAYS ... half of respondents were pessimistic about the future of BC's natural resource sector; may reflect slow pace of project approval in BC, and well-publicized opposition to resource development


Promoting innovation ... marketing BC's "low carbon advantage" ... and building new markets ... needed for the resource sector to compete globally

British Columbians recognize the integral role natural resources play in driving the provincial economy and support increased investment in the sector to encourage sustainable resource development.


That's one of the key findings of the inaugural BC Natural Resources Survey conducted by the BC Chamber of Commerce, C3 Alliance Corp, and research company Abacus Data, between November 14th of last year, and January 10th of this year.

The survey was designed to gauge public perceptions on natural resource development, growth prospects for various business sectors, obstacles holding back resource expansion and ideas for sustainable development, among other issues.

More than 1,000 individuals responded to the survey, representing a broad cross-section of British Columbians comprising a healthy mix of income and education levels, geographic regions, and spanning diverse political affiliations. Half of respondents had no ties to the resource sector, while the other half either worked in natural resources or had a family member or acquaintance affiliated with the sector.

"We undertook this research project to get a better sense of how British Columbians felt about the province's economic drivers," said Sarah Weber, President and CEO, C3 Alliance Corp.

"Clearly, BC residents understand the important contribution of natural resources to their economic well being. Even among individuals who are not connected to the sector, there's a deep appreciation for the role natural resources play in driving BC's prosperity."

Among the survey findings:
  • 55% of respondents said natural resources were crucial to the BC economy, while another 43% considered them very important.
  • 86% of people either strongly agreed or agreed that a strong resource sector helps create a vibrant economic base in BC on which we can grow other parts of the economy.
  • A majority of respondents (81%) acknowledged that revenue from natural resources helps pay for provincial social programs such as health care and education.
  • 75% of people agreed that the provincial government should encourage more investment in BC's natural resource sector.

"What we're seeing is broad-based support for responsible resource development by British Columbians," said Val Litwin, President and CEO of the BC Chamber of Commerce.

"BC's reliance on clean hydroelectricity gives our resource sector a distinct low-carbon advantage compared to other international jurisdictions.  This is a key selling point that we should be marketing aggressively to help grow our economic base."

British Columbians recognize this export attribute, with 78% of respondents saying they would like BC to more aggressively promote its "low-carbon advantage" globally.


The majority of respondents are proud of BC's natural resource sector, acknowledging that participating companies offer well-paying, highly skilled jobs, are environmentally thoughtful, well run, technologically advanced and innovative. Sixty-five percent of British Columbians said they would encourage young people to work in natural resources.

When asked how important various business sectors will be in ten years, 47% cited natural resources, with another 36% stated the sector will play the same role it does today.

Specific business segments British Columbians believe are poised for growth include: renewable energy (75%), followed by high-technology (68%), energy (58%), agriculture (54%), natural gas/LNG (51%), tourism/hospitality (45%), forest products (31%), mining (29%), and film and TV production (22%).

It's notable that when asked how they would prefer specific sectors to rank in terms of their importance to the BC economy, 53% of British Columbians said they would like to see forestry become 'more important' followed by 44% who cited mining.

Surprisingly, half of respondents were pessimistic about the future of the province's natural resource sector, which may reflect the slow pace of project approval in BC and well-publicized opposition to resource development. Impediments to growth cited include onerous government regulations, pressure groups and protests, climate change, labour costs, insufficient government incentives to attract investment, competition for talent, climate and taxes.

British Columbians believe we must take measures to improve economic prospects for the natural resources industry including; promoting innovation, positioning BC as a leader in low-carbon resource products and identifying and building markets for sustainably produced products.


Results from the BC Natural Resources Survey will be presented at the 17th Annual BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, BC , January 28 to 30, 2020.  

Speakers at the Forum will include BC Premier John Horgan, Tracy Robinson, Executive Vice-President and President, Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines, TC Energy, Sue Paish, CEO, Canada's Digital Technology Supercluster, Affonso Jr. Bizon, General Manager, Rio Tinto BC Works, Peter Zebedee, CEO, LNG Canada, James Thompson, Vice-President, Western Region, CN, and Chief Councillor Crystal Smith, Haisla Nation, among other community and industry leaders.

SOURCE C3 Alliance Corp.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more