BCs argument was a wretched effort to maintain that provincial environmental law is paramount over federal constitutional authority
TODAY, THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA issued a
unanimous decision on the Trans Mountain Expansion Project.
After reading the following comments, who do
you think is best articulating how you feel?
BC Premier John Horgan;
“Clearly, we are disappointed by the
decision, but this does not reduce our concerns regarding the potential of a
catastrophic oil spill on our coast. Our government takes our responsibility to
defend the interests of British Columbians seriously. When it comes to protecting
our coast, our environment and our economy, we will continue do all we can
within our jurisdiction.”
George Heyman, BC Minister of
Environment and Climate Change Strategy; “The Province has
been reviewing the conditions attached to the provincial environmental
certificate as directed by the BC Court of Appeal’s decision last fall.
Today’s decision provides some further context for that work. We remain
concerned about the risks posed by diluted bitumen, and we will continue to do
all we can to defend our environment, our coast and the tens of thousands of
jobs that rely on them.”
Doug Schweitzer, Alberta Minister of Justice
and Solicitor General:
“The Supreme Court of Canada has upheld
the rule of law and put an end to the British Columbia government’s campaign of
obstruction against Alberta energy ... ruled the BC government does not have
constitutional authority to stop the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion through
delay, uncertainty and the likely prospect of future litigation ... (we) look
forward to the continued construction of the Trans Mountain Pipeline.”
BC Liberal Leader
Andrew Wilkinson;
“John
Horgan knew the federal government held clear jurisdiction over the pipeline
but he spent millions of dollars just in political posturing ... documents reveal
that as of March 31st, 2019, the NDP had spent nearly $1 million in taxpayer
dollars on external legal fees alone ... this has been a total waste of BC
taxpayer money by the NDP. British Columbians deserve better”.
AND THEN WE HAVE the
comments of John Feldsted, a political commentator, consultant, and strategist,
from Winnipeg;
“The dismissal came
as no surprise. The British Columbia argument was a wretched effort to maintain
that provincial environmental law is paramount over federal constitutional
authority. That simply did not fly. The general rule is that when provincial
law conflicts with federal law, federal law will prevail (there are rare
exceptions)”.
One thing is certain for
me ... Horgan and Heyman have been little more than obstructionists for over
two years now. Hopefully, with this
decision, it will end, and construction of the Trans Mountain pipeline can go
on without further issue.
Comments
Post a Comment