Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

BCs argument was a wretched effort to maintain that provincial environmental law is paramount over federal constitutional authority


TODAY, THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA issued a unanimous decision on the Trans Mountain Expansion Project.   

After reading the following comments, who do you think is best articulating how you feel?


BC Premier John Horgan;
Clearly, we are disappointed by the decision, but this does not reduce our concerns regarding the potential of a catastrophic oil spill on our coast. Our government takes our responsibility to defend the interests of British Columbians seriously. When it comes to protecting our coast, our environment and our economy, we will continue do all we can within our jurisdiction.”


George Heyman, BC Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy; The Province has been reviewing the conditions attached to the provincial environmental certificate as directed by the BC Court of Appeal’s decision last fall. 

Today’s decision provides some further context for that work. We remain concerned about the risks posed by diluted bitumen, and we will continue to do all we can to defend our environment, our coast and the tens of thousands of jobs that rely on them.


Doug Schweitzer, Alberta Minister of Justice and Solicitor General:  
The Supreme Court of Canada has upheld the rule of law and put an end to the British Columbia government’s campaign of obstruction against Alberta energy ... ruled the BC government does not have constitutional authority to stop the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion through delay, uncertainty and the likely prospect of future litigation ... (we) look forward to the continued construction of the Trans Mountain Pipeline.”



BC Liberal Leader Andrew Wilkinson;
 John Horgan knew the federal government held clear jurisdiction over the pipeline but he spent millions of dollars just in political posturing ... documents reveal that as of March 31st, 2019, the NDP had spent nearly $1 million in taxpayer dollars on external legal fees alone ... this has been a total waste of BC taxpayer money by the NDP. British Columbians deserve better”.


AND THEN WE HAVE the comments of John Feldsted, a political commentator, consultant, and strategist, from Winnipeg;
The dismissal came as no surprise. The British Columbia argument was a wretched effort to maintain that provincial environmental law is paramount over federal constitutional authority. That simply did not fly. The general rule is that when provincial law conflicts with federal law, federal law will prevail (there are rare exceptions)”.


One thing is certain for me ... Horgan and Heyman have been little more than obstructionists for over two years now.  Hopefully, with this decision, it will end, and construction of the Trans Mountain pipeline can go on without further issue.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more