Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

BCs argument was a wretched effort to maintain that provincial environmental law is paramount over federal constitutional authority


TODAY, THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA issued a unanimous decision on the Trans Mountain Expansion Project.   

After reading the following comments, who do you think is best articulating how you feel?


BC Premier John Horgan;
Clearly, we are disappointed by the decision, but this does not reduce our concerns regarding the potential of a catastrophic oil spill on our coast. Our government takes our responsibility to defend the interests of British Columbians seriously. When it comes to protecting our coast, our environment and our economy, we will continue do all we can within our jurisdiction.”


George Heyman, BC Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy; The Province has been reviewing the conditions attached to the provincial environmental certificate as directed by the BC Court of Appeal’s decision last fall. 

Today’s decision provides some further context for that work. We remain concerned about the risks posed by diluted bitumen, and we will continue to do all we can to defend our environment, our coast and the tens of thousands of jobs that rely on them.


Doug Schweitzer, Alberta Minister of Justice and Solicitor General:  
The Supreme Court of Canada has upheld the rule of law and put an end to the British Columbia government’s campaign of obstruction against Alberta energy ... ruled the BC government does not have constitutional authority to stop the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion through delay, uncertainty and the likely prospect of future litigation ... (we) look forward to the continued construction of the Trans Mountain Pipeline.”



BC Liberal Leader Andrew Wilkinson;
 John Horgan knew the federal government held clear jurisdiction over the pipeline but he spent millions of dollars just in political posturing ... documents reveal that as of March 31st, 2019, the NDP had spent nearly $1 million in taxpayer dollars on external legal fees alone ... this has been a total waste of BC taxpayer money by the NDP. British Columbians deserve better”.


AND THEN WE HAVE the comments of John Feldsted, a political commentator, consultant, and strategist, from Winnipeg;
The dismissal came as no surprise. The British Columbia argument was a wretched effort to maintain that provincial environmental law is paramount over federal constitutional authority. That simply did not fly. The general rule is that when provincial law conflicts with federal law, federal law will prevail (there are rare exceptions)”.


One thing is certain for me ... Horgan and Heyman have been little more than obstructionists for over two years now.  Hopefully, with this decision, it will end, and construction of the Trans Mountain pipeline can go on without further issue.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more