Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

While there’s a good likelihood participants will find work after completing their program, can someone explain why one will cost $18,000 per participant – and the other nearly double that at $37,000


Just two days ago, Shane Simpson, Minister of Social Development and Poverty Reduction, announced that up to 25 British Columbians, affected by the downturn in the forest sector, were going to receive training and work experience in asphalt paving and heavy construction.


In making the announcement he commented that, “We know that heavy equipment operators and similar construction occupations will be in great demand over the next 10 years. 

The provincial government is working with industry and unions to hire trainees and provide training for new career path opportunities that will allow British Columbians to support themselves and their families”.

With a government grant of nearly half a million dollars ($450,000) the International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) Local 115, in partnership with Emil Anderson Construction, Dawson Blacktop and Dawson Group will be delivering road-building and heavy-construction training programs for 25 individuals from the Clearwater, Merritt, South Cariboo and Kamloops areas.

Participants' training will include classroom instruction in computer and communications skills, technical training in asphalt paving and heavy equipment operations, on-the-job work experience with an IUOE Local 115 signatory employer, and follow-up support and mentoring to help participants find jobs in the road-building and heavy-construction industry.

I wondered about the $450,000 investment, to train 25 people (works out to $18,000 per person), however one individual indicated to me that ...

18K ought to cover pay for instructors and students, plus some notional figure for classrooms, transportation, and use of heavy equipment. If one were to (arbitrarily) assign an all-in cost of $100-$125 per hour, then that might buy 4-5 weeks of a comprehensive course.

These educational features ought to provide a better base of knowledge than the once-standard, "Just jump up here beside me and I'll show you which levers to pull", old-school training. I would think that the combination of the two would make the successful students’ prime candidates for full-time work, and perhaps a new career in road-building.

Not to be left out, Doug Donaldson, whose leadership of the Forest’s Ministry has been greatly scrutinized as of late, stated ... “Our priority is supporting workers and their families when it comes to the challenges facing British Columbia’s forestry sector”. 


Then yesterday, in another announcement from Premier John Horgan’s NDP government, came news that ... ten women in the Lower Mainland will get training and work experience in the road-building industry, giving them opportunities for job success and improved lives, thanks to more than $370,000 in provincial government funding.

In this case, it will be the YWCA Metro Vancouver (YWCA), in partnership with the International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) Local 115, who will deliver the 25-week YWCA Breaking Ground Heavy Equipment Operator Training and Employment Program for Women.

So, here is my question ... or maybe questions?

Tuesdays announcement was to provide training for new career path opportunities that will allow British Columbians to support themselves and their families.  This program, for 25 individuals (both men and women) works out to, as I mentioned, $18,000 per person.

Yesterdays announcement, is for what appears to be the same type of training ... road building, heavy equipment operation, heavy construction, on-the-job work experience with an IUOE Local 115 signatory employer, personalized job placement and follow-up support with a YWCA job coach.

The cost for this however?  It’s $37,000 per person!

While I believe this type of training will be valuable, and that there will be a good likelihood of participant finding work after completing their program, can someone explain why one will cost $18,000 per participant – and the other nearly double that at $37,000.

Feel free to review the two announcements at:
“Roadwork training leads to jobs in the Interior” – CLICK HERE
"Training program helps women secure road-building jobs" – CLICK HERE

Maybe you’ll be able to see what I’ve missed that makes the costs of one, substantially higher than the other.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more