Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

‘20 for 2020’ -- This is NOT to reduce budgets for these three ministries, INSTEAD, it is to ensure what’s allocated provides BC residents the best services and education possible


Today's topic on “20 for 2020” is one that is occasionally heard – generally from individuals and political parties who describe themselves as grassroots or populist -- but the idea is often times dismissed as too much work.

That idea?? Bottom up budgeting.

Given however that the Ministry of Health consumes over $20 billion dollars each and every year (approximately 36+ percent of the provincial budget), and that amount continues to increase ...

... and that the Education system (K to 12) has a budget of $6.355 billion ... and Advanced Education, Skills, and Training has a budget of $2.212 billion ...  they consume over 16+ percent of the provincial budget ... an amount which also continues to grow annually.

Well over half of the BC budget (many have stated it is in fact nearly 60%) is consumed by these three all important ministries.

To do a complete bottom up budget for each of these three would indeed consume much by way of time, and likely ‘initial’ financial costs, therefore a schedule over multiple years would likely be mor practical, and could be adjusted as needed:

For each of the six Health Authorities ... 1 per year
For the provinces 60 school districts ... 10 districts per year
Advanced Education ... every 3 years
Skills and Training ... every 3 years

Let me be clear, my thought towards this is NOT to reduce the budgets of these three ministries, INSTEAD, it is to ensure the highest portion of monies allocated provide BC residents the best services and education possible.

This could also give British Columbians a better understanding of staffing levels between front-line workers (some would say too low) and administration (some would say too high) – something which I also hear many questions about.


Regardless, there you have it ... suggestion number 13 in our series of “20 for 2020” is to provide bottom up budgeting for the Health and Education Ministries.  Care to share any thoughts you may have on this topic?? I’d be delighted to hear them.

Just a reminder that if you have missed any of the previous ideas and suggestions, from “20 for 2020”, you can catch up at the following links:
#3 … there should be a full review of all license costs and fees, which the provincial government has imposed upon us, to see where and how they are being used






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more