Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

This is day number four … of 20 for 2020


If you’ve been following along, today will now be day number four in what I am calling, “20 for 2020”.  Each day is another idea that I believe those who wish to govern us in BC, should commit to doing.

None of these ideas have been radical (at least to me) … in fact I think most would find it hard to argue they are little more than the basics of good government, and ensuring the well-being of the citizens of our province.


Today's idea fits well with the concept of our well-being, and it has to do with our health.

While there have been multiple attempts to retain and keep medical practitioners in some of the more rural areas of the province – a permanent fix to the problem needs to be worked out.

That fix should begin by reviewing all possible options to train, and retain, doctors to take up practice in the rural communities where they have grown up.  Talk with young people and ask them what they will need to stay … and talk with those still in those areas and communities to see what’s kept them where they are.

For example, some communities have offered free or reduced costs for housing; make this something throughout all areas needing assistance in getting medical care practitioners.  Other incentives could include 2 or 3 weekends away annually, to attend events such as concerts, the theatre, major league sports, and the like.

Here’s the big one however …


According to an April 2018 Globe and Mail story … medical school tuition fees range from $7,000 to $27,000 annually in Canada, plus living expenses. Medical students graduate with more than $100,000 in debt on average; $250,000 in debt is not unusual and it often grows during residency.

Have medical practitioners commit to a minimum stay of 5 years in a community where doctors are badly needed, and in exchange have the costs of their education paid off by 10 percent each year. 

Those living and working in a community for five to ten years will likely have put down strong roots in the community, and will therefore be more inclined to stay.

These are just a few suggestions, and I am sure many others could be explored, however there needs to be a long-term commitment by government, to ensure medical services are available to people where they live.

And with that, day four of “20 to 2020” comes to a close. As I mentioned yesterday, if you have an idea to contribute, let me know, and I’ll see if I can work it in.  If you’ve missed any of the first three, click the following links to check them out:
#1 … those who wish to lead, should acknowledge that government must be about people.

#2 … a review of services provided to areas and regions where much of the provinces revenues are collected from.

#3 … there should be a full review of all license costs and fees, which the provincial government has imposed upon us, to see where and how they are being used
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more