Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

STEPHEN WOODWORTH: I’d be busy arresting and jailing people all day long if it was made illegal to lie for political purposes!



Here’s a reply I composed to someone who proposes putting politicians in jail when they do things he doesn’t approve of:

 
I don’t know where you live but in my country, Canada, my political opponents do many of the things you describe or that I consider to be unjust, uncharitable, or deceitful. Because defending my country’s democratic way of life is so very important, I’m going to describe it to you in greater detail than we usually do on FaceBook.

Except for corruption, fraud and theft in my country all the other things you describe are not prohibited by law.

Also, my political opponents are supported by, and include, about 30% of the population who agree with their policies on the issues you mention. We would have to build a lot more jails to hold them if we criminalized their political choices.

In my country if I wanted to make their objectionable conduct subject to jailing, I would first have to pass a law prohibiting it. We have what is called “rule of law,” by which we mean, among other things, that if something isn’t specifically prohibited by law then it’s permitted. My political opponents want to do away with that, by the way.

To give just one example, for instance, not only is there no law prohibiting authorities from cracking down on protests but in fact there’s a law which *authorizes* them to crack down on protests. To make matters worse, that law contains no consequences for authorities who don’t follow its procedures and rules. I would have to first get my elected representatives to enact an amendment adding consequences. I can’t just make up my own rules and put them in prison. In my country, we call that “democracy.”

To use another case you mention, lying, I can’t tell you the number of times I wished it was illegal for my political opponents to lie! Every day on FaceBook one or more of my political opponents lie. My political opponents have lied in their political campaigns. They even lie in Parliament, and I couldn’t even get the Speaker to reprimand them for doing so the one time I tried!


The Speaker gave an explanation I found hard to swallow, even though I had no choice but to accept it, although I fully understand his reasoning. He said it’s not always easy to know when someone is lying so it’s up to the electorate to decide whether someone is lying, and their remedy is to put such people out of office, and it would limit free speech if one partisan or faction could punish another one just for saying something, even if it was inaccurate. So somehow I have to convince electors to throw the “bums” out of office. Democratic electoral remedies are a lot harder than just arresting people! 

Anyway, I’d be busy arresting and jailing people all day long if it was made illegal to lie for political purposes!

Even when something is illegal in my country, we have rules that limit how we respond, including things like due process, the requirement that the benefit of reasonable doubt be given to the accused, the need to prove guilty intent, and many others! So, on the previous example of lying, for instance, even if we made it illegal to lie for political purposes, we would still have to prove they actually knew what they were saying was a lie and they weren’t just deluded.

We’re aware that there are countries in the world where whoever gains power can get away with simply jailing anyone they disagree with, like Russia, China, North Korea, Cuba, Iran, and so on. We’ve made the decision that there are significant disadvantages to those systems, so we bend over backwards not to head in the other direction.

Don’t get me wrong, there’s some laws I’s like to see enacted to curb some political abuses! However, I have to do it the democratic way. Right now, public opinion in my country often seems to be going the other way, in non-democratic directions.

The irony is that even proposing non-democratic measures is legal in my country, and if my political opponents can convince enough people to support them, then that’s what will happen. The irony is that I can’t see any way to stop them except by democratic persuasion and elections, or I become just like them! As a wise man one said (paraphrasing), democracy has a lot of flaws but it’s still better than any other system of government.

If you’ve read this far, thank you for your patience and thank you for this dialogue! May all your good endeavours be blessed!
 
 
Stephen Woodworth ... was Member of Parliament for Kitchener Centre (Conservative) from 2008 to 2015, after having practised law in his riding for almost 30 years.

He studied Political Science at Wilfrid Laurier University for 2 years, followed by attaining his Bachelor of Laws from the University of Western Ontario. He served in local government as a School Trustee from 1994 to 2003. He is a lifelong community volunteer and political activist, and the Executive Director of The Democracy Defence Initiative.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more