Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH -- Fair Vote Canada wants to influence who becomes the next Liberal leader. What about groups sympathetic to Hamas?


Yesterday (January 11th) I received an email from Fair Vote Canada with the following in its subject line:

Sign up to vote in the Liberal Party’s leadership race to help elect a leader who supports proportional representation!

In part, the email stated that:

We realize that most Fair Vote Canada supporters are not partisan Liberals.

Registering to vote in the Liberal leadership race has nothing to do with who you plan to support in the next election!

We all have a stake in who is chosen as the next Liberal leader. Let’s seize this chance to make an impact for proportional representation!

To vote in the Liberal leadership race you only need to register as a supporter by January 27.

Registration is open to anyone 14 or older who is a Canadian citizen, permanent resident, or has status under the Indian Act, and who isn’t a member of another federal political party. (Rules Here).

We know this email is unusual. We wouldn’t be asking you to do this if it didn’t matter.

Opportunities to influence the choice of a party leader―someone who will hold an incredible amount of power in our system―are rare.

For an organization that infers support for election fairness, this whole process of taking out memberships, under the circumstances they are suggesting, seems odd.

Is it ‘fair’ for Fair Vote Canada to suggest people take out a one-and-done memberships (to simply vote in the leadership race) when party rules say that an individual must “support the purposes of the party”?

Still, it’s my personal opinion that the Liberal Party of Canada has only itself to blame for this situation, by allowing anyone to sign up – at NO COST – to become a member; including people as young as 14 years of age.

Based on these rules any group or organization, with a large enough membership, or support base, could theoretically overwhelm the existing (or more importantly active) membership of the party.


For example, week after week we have seen disruptive, and very much illegal protests, mounted by pro-Hamas supporters.  These protesters have disrupted the ability of companies, and in some cases entire shopping malls, to conduct business – WITH IMPUNITY.

They have vandalized businesses … burned Canadian flags … promoted rage and hate against Israel … and even the deaths of Israeli’s and the elimination of their country.

Here's where it gets interesting.

Hamas is a Palestinian militant group which has governed over Gaza since 2007 and has been listed as a terrorist entity by the Government of Canada for over two decades (City News), and yet polices forces and governments at various levels have allowed never-ending illegal activities to take place by Hamas and Palestinian organizations.

What if in the days ahead these same groups and organizations also encouraged their supporters to do the very same thing and take advantage of:

Opportunities to influence the choice of a party leader―someone who will hold an incredible amount of power in our system.

I honestly don’t believe that Fair Vote Canada thought their idea through to its logical conclusion; that any group or organization could do the very same thing they are suggesting.

Is it ‘fair’, Fair Vote Canada?  Of course, it is … but is it right?

I don’t think so. Nor is it right for the Liberal Party of Canada to allow for something like this to take place. It’s dangerous to our democracy.

Anyway, that’s where I’m at.  The floors open to you now; what do you think?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Okanagan Farmers Face NDP-Created Water Crisis ~~ BC Conservatives

Okanagan farmers are facing a water crisis as government-imposed restrictions threaten to kill their crops and destroy one of B.C.’s most important agricultural industries. In perhaps the most water-rich province in the country, our farmers have been left high and dry by the NDP government. For nine weeks, Okanagan and Shuswap farmers have proposed solutions, only to be met with NDP foot-dragging. Now forest fires have come to these regions as they are simultaneously reckoning with a water crisis that has been made worse through years of government inaction. Vernon-area farms have lost 70 percent of their water, while Kelowna and Summerland growers face severe restrictions. This situation is unacceptable and cannot continue. Ian Paton, Shadow Minister for Agriculture, said the NDP is once again forcing farmers to pay for its own failure to plan. "Farmers and ranchers must be listened to when decisions affecting their livelihoods are made, and under the NDP, they aren’t," said...

BC Conservatives Point to Warning Signs in BC’s Economy

While Canada posted modest job gains in July, warning lights are still flashing in British Columbia. Youth unemployment remains stubbornly high, leaving too many first-time jobseekers shut out of the workforce. BC also lost 3,400 public administration jobs in July, likely as temporary Census positions ended. “BC's jobs divide remains stark. Unemployment is far higher in business-driven communities like Kelowna (9.3%) and Abbotsford-Mission (8.3%) than in Victoria (5.0%). Government should be focused on creating the conditions for private-sector investment and job growth,” said Gavin Dew, MLA for Kelowna-Mission and Shadow Minister for Economic Development. “We need an economy where young people can find work, businesses can hire, and every region has the opportunity to prosper.” This comes as BC faces five straight quarters where more businesses are closing than opening, an NDP cabinet rift over job-creating projects like Tilbury LNG, and fresh signs that even the province's to...

FORSETH: That, to me, sure seems to fit with narcissistic personality disorder – AND - a definite sense of self entitlement

I think most people are aware of why England’s Henry the 8th created the Church of England. It was out of a belief that he should be able to do anything he wanted. And what did he want?  It was a male heir that would follow him and, at his death, become the next King of England.   His marriage to Catherine had not produced one, so he demanded the Pope to allow him to divorce her.  The Pope of course refused so Henry created his own church, and declared himself the "Supreme Head of the Church of England", thereby allowing him to annul the marriage. In other words, he wanted his own way, and because he had the ultimate power in England, he forced his will over the church. Many (most?) would say people suffer like that from 'narcissistic personality disorder'. The Mayo Clinic says, “ People with this disorder may lack the ability to understand or care about the feelings of others. But behind this mask of extreme confidence, they are not sure of their self-worth and are e...

Labels

Show more