Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH -- Fair Vote Canada wants to influence who becomes the next Liberal leader. What about groups sympathetic to Hamas?


Yesterday (January 11th) I received an email from Fair Vote Canada with the following in its subject line:

Sign up to vote in the Liberal Party’s leadership race to help elect a leader who supports proportional representation!

In part, the email stated that:

We realize that most Fair Vote Canada supporters are not partisan Liberals.

Registering to vote in the Liberal leadership race has nothing to do with who you plan to support in the next election!

We all have a stake in who is chosen as the next Liberal leader. Let’s seize this chance to make an impact for proportional representation!

To vote in the Liberal leadership race you only need to register as a supporter by January 27.

Registration is open to anyone 14 or older who is a Canadian citizen, permanent resident, or has status under the Indian Act, and who isn’t a member of another federal political party. (Rules Here).

We know this email is unusual. We wouldn’t be asking you to do this if it didn’t matter.

Opportunities to influence the choice of a party leader―someone who will hold an incredible amount of power in our system―are rare.

For an organization that infers support for election fairness, this whole process of taking out memberships, under the circumstances they are suggesting, seems odd.

Is it ‘fair’ for Fair Vote Canada to suggest people take out a one-and-done memberships (to simply vote in the leadership race) when party rules say that an individual must “support the purposes of the party”?

Still, it’s my personal opinion that the Liberal Party of Canada has only itself to blame for this situation, by allowing anyone to sign up – at NO COST – to become a member; including people as young as 14 years of age.

Based on these rules any group or organization, with a large enough membership, or support base, could theoretically overwhelm the existing (or more importantly active) membership of the party.


For example, week after week we have seen disruptive, and very much illegal protests, mounted by pro-Hamas supporters.  These protesters have disrupted the ability of companies, and in some cases entire shopping malls, to conduct business – WITH IMPUNITY.

They have vandalized businesses … burned Canadian flags … promoted rage and hate against Israel … and even the deaths of Israeli’s and the elimination of their country.

Here's where it gets interesting.

Hamas is a Palestinian militant group which has governed over Gaza since 2007 and has been listed as a terrorist entity by the Government of Canada for over two decades (City News), and yet polices forces and governments at various levels have allowed never-ending illegal activities to take place by Hamas and Palestinian organizations.

What if in the days ahead these same groups and organizations also encouraged their supporters to do the very same thing and take advantage of:

Opportunities to influence the choice of a party leader―someone who will hold an incredible amount of power in our system.

I honestly don’t believe that Fair Vote Canada thought their idea through to its logical conclusion; that any group or organization could do the very same thing they are suggesting.

Is it ‘fair’, Fair Vote Canada?  Of course, it is … but is it right?

I don’t think so. Nor is it right for the Liberal Party of Canada to allow for something like this to take place. It’s dangerous to our democracy.

Anyway, that’s where I’m at.  The floors open to you now; what do you think?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more