Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Nutrien Choosing the U.S. Over BC Is Proof Investors Don’t Trust David Eby’s Leadership

BC Conservative Leader John Rustad says Nutrien’s decision to export Saskatchewan potash through Washington State instead of British Columbia is a direct result of Premier David Eby’s failed leadership.

“Nutrien didn’t leave BC by accident. They left because British Columbia, under David Eby, has become unpredictable, unstable, and unfriendly to private sector investment,” Rustad said.

Nutrien cited congestion, bottlenecks, labour issues, and reliability concerns, but Rustad says the deeper reason is the uncertainty Eby has created through his First Nations reconciliation agenda and legal directives on land ownership and project approvals.

“Companies see the chaos around land title, legal disputes, and shifting jurisdiction,” Rustad said. “They see a government that won’t defend certainty. No global company is going to put a billion-dollar terminal in a province where the rules keep changing.”

Rustad said investors now see the United States as a safer, more stable choice than British Columbia, and that should alarm every British Columbian.

“This is a massive failure,” Rustad said. “We are losing jobs and investment because David Eby has made BC a risky bet. Investors don’t trust him.”

Rustad said a BC Conservative government will restore confidence by ending ideological uncertainty, protecting property rights, and providing clear, predictable approval processes.

“BC should be the gateway to the world, not the province companies avoid,” Rustad said. “This happened because of David Eby and his far-left agenda. And it will keep happening until there is a change in government.”

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Conservative leadership candidate would move some resource officials out of Victoria

... While he is emphasizing his usual campaign priorities including his leadership experience and plans for the future, Black also revealed a philosophy that he has yet to speak of publicly. While in the forest-sector dependent community of Castlegar, Black told Castlegar News that if he were eventually elected as premier, he would like to re-locate some bureaucrats from Victoria to the areas rich in the resource sectors they represent. “Why is the chief forester of British Columbia in Victoria, why isn’t that office out where the forestry is?” asked Black. “We need to get senior officials, that impact the livelihoods of our communities, out of Victoria and in offices elsewhere ... CLICK HERE for the full story

US Tribes Using DRIPA to Expand Influence in British Columbia

The BC Conservatives are sounding the alarm after receiving multiple filings in the BC Supreme Court in which U.S.-based Indigenous tribes are relying on DRIPA, UNDRIP, and the Interpretation Act to assert greater recognition of Aboriginal rights and direct involvement in British Columbia affairs. “This is a clear and growing sovereignty crisis,” said Scott McInnis, Critic for Indigenous Relations. “The Premier himself has referred to the DRIPA situation as an existential threat to British Columbia, and has said amendments are non‑negotiable. We are now seeing exactly why.” Court cases reveal that American tribes are attempting to leverage DRIPA to gain standing and influence inside BC. “It is becoming increasingly clear that DRIPA is being weaponized in ways never transparently disclosed to British Columbians,” McInnis said. “Allowing U.S. tribes to expand their reach into BC governance is deeply concerning and completely unacceptable.” One notable case, brought by a group of Alaskan ...

Labels

Show more