Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN – In the coming year the BC NDP Cabinet is facing massive tests of courage


 

Firstly, the answer is NO to the question being asked of every politician in Canada right now. I have barely left my house in Tsartlip during the holiday season never mind the city, province or country.

 

Former Ontario Finance Minister Rod Phillips said no one was more disappointed than he is about his shocking decision to fly to the Caribbean for a little COVID-19 vacation. [1] I hope he enjoyed it while it lasted, I was home dodging rain drops and celebrating the holiday season with my family via video chats.

 

Facing bias, stigmas and fallacies:
There is not a more poignant example of a bias we need to extinguish than the stigma of people who suffer from poor mental health and addictions. In the coming year we are going to have to get real and honest about the crisis of anxiety, fear and depression plaguing our society. It’s hard to imagine that in our world that offers anything you want for a price you can afford, that there is still so much sadness.

 

In the past few years too many of our friends, family members, neighbours, and co-workers have taken their own lives, or have died as a result of poisonous street drugs. Well-rooted biases against people who struggle with mental health and/or use illicit drugs have muted the response of government institutions and their political heads. We have failed to act with the urgency that is needed!

 

We must set aside this bias, stop treating people with health issues as criminals, and provide access to the treatment and medicine that they need. In the coming year I will have little patience for the political rhetoric that has excused our lack of desperation. This must be the year of action.

 

In 2021, decision-makers in British Columbia will be tested by the status quo and sunk costs biases in many ways.

 

The status quo bias is “when people prefer things to stay the same by doing nothing or by sticking with a decision made previously.” [2]

 

Forestry:

This well explains forestry policy in British Columbia. Fibre has been the highest value our government has put on our forests since the first European ships arrived on the Pacific coast. We may eventually get to advancing a more holistic approach to landscape management in our province, but until then politicians continue to talk and log.

 

The pressure is building as tens of thousands of concerned British Columbians demand Premier John Horgan live up to his promises to implement the recommendations of the old growth review panel. Will his government have the courage? Will they demonstrate the leadership needed to change forestry policy in British Columbia? We shall see.

 

 

BC Hydro’s Site C Dam:

The sunk cost bias is when we “continue a behavior or endeavor as a result of previously invested resources (time, money or effort).” [3] Also known as the sunk cost fallacy, this will pose a significant challenge for Premier Horgan, and all the BC NDP Cabinet Ministers, as they face the hard truths about BC Hydro’s Site C dam project.

 

As Premier Horgan, and Energy Minister Bruce Ralston, deflect responsibility and blame the BC Liberals, there should be no doubt that Site C is a BC NDP project now. [4]

 

In 2017, only the BC NDP made the decision to proceed with the project. At the time Mr. Horgan justified it saying, “to cancel it would add billions to the Province’s debt – putting at risk our ability to deliver housing, childcare, schools and hospitals for families across B.C. And that’s a price we’re not willing to pay.” [5]

 

Now we are three years down the road and with calls for an inquiry into Site C to get to the bottom of who knew what and for how long, Mr. Horgan and Mr. Ralston pushed the decision on the project until we learn the findings of the much-anticipated Milburn report. [6] It is eerily reminiscent of late 2017, the first time a Horgan Government struggled with sunk costs on Site C.

 

In the coming year the BC NDP Cabinet is facing massive tests of courage. How will they address the substantial status quo and sunk costs biases that all decision-makers confront?

 

On behalf of all British Columbians, it is my hope for 2021 that they can overcome these entrenched biases and pass the tests.

 

 

Adam Olsen (SȾHENEP) ... is the MLA-elect for Saanich North and the Islands and member of the B.C. Green Caucus. He was first elected to the British Columbia Legislative Assembly in May 2017 and re-elected in October 2020.

 

Born in Victoria, BC, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more