Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED – Democratic institutions require that those elected to governing bodies be committed to democratic principles first and always

 

Watching CBC and CTV coverage of the events in Washington during on Wednesday was mind-blowing. Canadian media reporters were pro-Democrat and virulently anti-Trump. The message was clear that current President Trump was entirely to blame for an assault on the American Capitol.

I do not condone political violence. It is the prelude to war. The foundation of democracy is to replace violent disputes with debate and an orderly expression of will through an independent and trusted secret ballot.


Events in America should alarm us. Listening to the Democratic and Republican House leaders talk about the sacredness of the Capitol chambers they occupy was disgusting. The occupants define the chambers. A contingent of amoral con-men and grifters in a cathedral will express the cathedral’s reputation.

And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the money changers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.

You need not be a Christian or member of any faith to understand the principle.

 

Democratic institutions require that those elected to governing bodies be committed to democratic principles first and always. Election to office does not create a democrat, but a tyrant’s election can sully a democratic institution.

The demonstrations in Washington and elsewhere in the US were expressions of frustration due to state officials’ failure to maintain confidence in the electoral system. Refusing to consider requests for recounts and reviews of suspected fraud invited the conclusion that there was something to hide.

The reaction should have been to undertake audits and prove that the electoral system was immune to fraud and gerrymandering attempts. Instead, the electoral system’s reputation hangs in tatters and will be an issue in the 2022 mid-term elections.

The refusal to audit election proceedings was wrong. When protestors persisted, election officials claimed there was no evidence of wrongdoing, but evidence depended on an election audit they refused to conduct. The stonewalling was a pernicious abdication of fiduciary responsibility.    

The concept that state election officials can dictate how to conduct a democratic election is rubbish. They must prove to electors that only qualified electors have voted and that there is no interference or meddling in how valid votes are counted and tabulated. The tail cannot be allowed to wag the dog.

‘The lady doth protest too much, methinks,’ is one of those lines from Shakespeare’s Hamlet that is quite simple but expresses enormous complexity of thought and emotion.

 

Calls for investigation into US Presidential election results were treated as personal criticisms of state election officials rather than calls to analyze the system they administer. Scoundrels wrapping themselves in the flag and declaring unwavering patriotism is not an acceptable response to calls for investigation of potential dereliction of duty.

The events playing out in the USA are of interest to us in Canada as our governments increasingly answer valid questions with “move along, nothing to see here.” Answer our questions, and we will decide if there is or is not something to concern us. 

 

John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more