Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED – Democratic institutions require that those elected to governing bodies be committed to democratic principles first and always

 

Watching CBC and CTV coverage of the events in Washington during on Wednesday was mind-blowing. Canadian media reporters were pro-Democrat and virulently anti-Trump. The message was clear that current President Trump was entirely to blame for an assault on the American Capitol.

I do not condone political violence. It is the prelude to war. The foundation of democracy is to replace violent disputes with debate and an orderly expression of will through an independent and trusted secret ballot.


Events in America should alarm us. Listening to the Democratic and Republican House leaders talk about the sacredness of the Capitol chambers they occupy was disgusting. The occupants define the chambers. A contingent of amoral con-men and grifters in a cathedral will express the cathedral’s reputation.

And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the money changers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.

You need not be a Christian or member of any faith to understand the principle.

 

Democratic institutions require that those elected to governing bodies be committed to democratic principles first and always. Election to office does not create a democrat, but a tyrant’s election can sully a democratic institution.

The demonstrations in Washington and elsewhere in the US were expressions of frustration due to state officials’ failure to maintain confidence in the electoral system. Refusing to consider requests for recounts and reviews of suspected fraud invited the conclusion that there was something to hide.

The reaction should have been to undertake audits and prove that the electoral system was immune to fraud and gerrymandering attempts. Instead, the electoral system’s reputation hangs in tatters and will be an issue in the 2022 mid-term elections.

The refusal to audit election proceedings was wrong. When protestors persisted, election officials claimed there was no evidence of wrongdoing, but evidence depended on an election audit they refused to conduct. The stonewalling was a pernicious abdication of fiduciary responsibility.    

The concept that state election officials can dictate how to conduct a democratic election is rubbish. They must prove to electors that only qualified electors have voted and that there is no interference or meddling in how valid votes are counted and tabulated. The tail cannot be allowed to wag the dog.

‘The lady doth protest too much, methinks,’ is one of those lines from Shakespeare’s Hamlet that is quite simple but expresses enormous complexity of thought and emotion.

 

Calls for investigation into US Presidential election results were treated as personal criticisms of state election officials rather than calls to analyze the system they administer. Scoundrels wrapping themselves in the flag and declaring unwavering patriotism is not an acceptable response to calls for investigation of potential dereliction of duty.

The events playing out in the USA are of interest to us in Canada as our governments increasingly answer valid questions with “move along, nothing to see here.” Answer our questions, and we will decide if there is or is not something to concern us. 

 

John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more