Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- The Perils of Unconstitutional Governance

 

The news of Governor General Julie Payette’s resignation or a similar problem was inevitable. There is a president and more to come. Our federal government is operating unconstitutionally. Our constitution requires that:

9.   The Executive Government and Authority of and over Canada is hereby declared to continue and be vested in the Queen.

10. The Provisions of this Act referring to the Governor General extend and apply to the Governor General for the time being of Canada, or other the Chief Executive Officer or Administrator for the time being carrying on the Government of Canada on behalf and in the Name of the Queen, by whatever Title he is designated.

11. There shall be a Council to aid and advise in the Government of Canada, to be styled the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada; and the Persons who are to be Members of that Council shall be from Time to Time chosen and summoned by the Governor General and sworn in as Privy Councillors, and Members thereof may be from Time to Time removed by the Governor General.

 

******************************************

    

There is more, but that is enough for now. The Privy Council is properly the Queen’s Privy Council, not the Prime Minister’s Privy Council. The Clerk of the Privy Council reports to the Governor General, not to the Prime Minister.

The Privy Council Clerk is also head of the federal civil service, must be politically neutral and ensure that the entire civil service is politically neutral. The civil service must serve whatever government the people elect without bias, favour, fear or partisanship.

Having the Clerk of the Privy Council reporting to the Prime Minister is unconstitutional. It robs the Governor General of his or her powers and politicizes the Privy Council and civil service.

The executive powers exercised by the Governor General must be politically neutral. It follows that his advisors on the Privy Council must also be neutral or politically balanced. The current practice of having the functioning privy council made up of government cabinet ministers does not serve Canada’s interests.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is mucking about in affairs outside his constitutional jurisdiction to the detriment of the nation. The executive power resides with the Governor General, not with the Prime Minister. The Governor General, not the Prime Minister, decides who will sit on the Privy Council.

One of the indicators of how wrong the current framework is, was when the Privy Council Clerk was badgering the Solicitor General in the SNC-Lavalin scandal. That is not the constitutional role of the Privy Council Clerk. He is not the Prime Minister’s servant and must be politically neutral. That is particularly important following a general election when the Governor General may be called on to choose the Prime Minister of a minority government.

Now the Governor General has been deemed unfit for office and resigned. Had she been appropriately guided by a politically neutral and experienced Privy Council Clerk, the debacle could have been avoided.

The Privy Council Clerk was moved to the Prime Minister’s Office under an Order in Council in 1940 by then Prime Minister Mackenzie King. An Order in Council cannot change the constitution. At the time, a constitutional change would have required Whitehall’s consent, which was not applied for or given.  

We must repair the unconstitutional federal government framework. Installing a replacement Governor General is not sufficient. He must have constitutional powers and a neutral Privy Council to ensure that he can lawfully exercise his duties.

 

John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 
Post a Comment
Read more

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more