Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- Rethinking British Columbia’s resource exploitation

 


In the rotunda of the British Columbia Legislature there are four murals representing British Columbia’s “founding” industries – agriculture, fishing, forestry and mining.

 

While there remains good opportunity in agriculture and mining, the fishing and forestry sectors have been in a state of decline for decades as a result of horrendous resource management policies.

 

As a kid trawling the Saanich Inlet for salmon with my dad, I had the miserable experience of witnessing what the end of the of a once glorious fishery looks like. I carry with me an inexplicable sadness knowing that I represent the last generation to regularly fish salmon in the inlet. It’s deeply disturbing when you consider that the Saanich Inlet produced abundant salmon for countless generations of my W̱SÁNEĆ ancestors.

 

When European ships appeared on the Pacific shores, the occupants settled and established a colony to exploit the bounty of the valleys, mountains, forests and seas. In the earliest days, the settlers partnered with local Indigenous resource developers to provide provisions. As time passed, the Indigenous people and villages became unwanted competition for the settlers.

 

Over thousands of years on the coast, Indigenous people developed entirely different relationships with nature than the perspective that the European newcomers brought with them.

 

I’m by no means an expert, however I encourage you to check out my speech on May 7, 2018 where I highlight the relationship my W̱SÁNEĆ family shares with our relatives the Pacific salmon.

 

That is just one example of my work in the Chamber on the critical issues facing our fishing and forestry sectors, I’ve stood dozens of times demanding government transform the relationship from the exploitative colonial approach to more closely reflect the approach of coastal Indigenous nations.

 

As we come to terms with the collapsing wild salmon stocks and devastated ancient forests, the result of utterly mismanaged landscapes, reform is one of the few options we have left. The BC NDP can no longer deceive themselves that the status quo approach will continue to support the provincial economy or coastal communities.

 

In light of this I want to highlight Stephanie Wood’s recent article in The Narwhal, (Want to save BC salmon? Bring back Indigenous fishing systems, study says). It’s clear the ancient Indigenous resource development technologies offer our future a glimmer of hope.

 

No doubt we would have been better off if those early European settlers paused a moment to pay respect to Indigenous craft and ingenuity, however they did not. It’s my sincere hope that this generation of governors will take the opportunity that our predecessors were unwilling to.

 


Adam Olsen (SȾHENEP) ... is the MLA for Saanich North and the Islands and member of the B.C. Green Caucus. He was first elected to the British Columbia Legislative Assembly in May 2017 and re-elected in October 2020.

Born in Victoria, BC, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W
̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more