Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

CENTER ICE CANADIANS: The next step is defining how a party will manage itself

 Dominic Cardy, Chair, Centre Ice Canadians Advisory Board


First, thanks to all those who wrote in with comments and suggestions on the draft policy framework Centre Ice shared last week. The feedback was overwhelmingly positive.

 

As we move towards our September 20 decision day on whether to start a new, evidence-based, and forward-looking political party, the next step is defining how that party would manage itself.

 

That means a discussion that’s sure to get hearts racing: party constitutions and bylaws!

 

Just like the policy framework, this project can’t be finished before the decision has been made about whether to launch a party. And, as you’d expect, there will be a clear process for making changes to the constitution, just as there will be for changing policies.

 


I used to advise political parties around the world on how to make them more democratic and accountable to members and, more important, to voters. That included developing party structures, and as I gained more experience working with over 60 parties, I realized two things:

 

**    Party constitutions only matter if party members decide they matter. I’ve seen beautifully written constitutions ignored by party leaders. Worse, party members tolerate it. Just like other institutions, it’s the hundreds of small, day-to-day decisions that matter. Party democracy is built by leaders defending institutions and members insisting leaders do their jobs. You can’t write that into a document, it’s a decision everyone involved in a party must make every day.

 

**    Keep your constitution as simple as possible. Just like national constitutions, party constitutions should be clear and simple. They should define broad principles, not specific policies. Structure, not detail.

 

If we go ahead, our constitution will be different from other parties in important ways. Here are some of those areas. What do you think?

 

Please send your feedback by Tuesday, September 5th so, that if the decision is made to start a new party, we will have a draft constitution ready for approval at the party’s first meeting.

 

 

Vision and values

 

The vision and values statement defines the party’s ideological borders. What should the government do? What is the role of a citizen? Those must be spelled out clearly, and they must be realistic. If everyone agrees with your value statement, it’s not offering much value.

 

Choosing a leader… and getting rid of them

 

We believe in choosing leaders through a delegated leadership convention, with each constituency having a maximum number of delegates chosen by local associations. Candidates need to show they can recruit members and strengthen the party.

 

Leaders can be removed by a 3/4 vote of the party’s governing body and a majority of the party’s caucus following any election where the party failed to win government. Only one leadership vote allowed between any two elections.

 

Choosing candidates

 

Just like choosing a leader, we want choosing a local candidate to reflect commitment to the party’s values. We would be asking people to apply for a job, as Member of Parliament, that will decide the future of our country. We want candidates to show how their judgment will make Canada better: that means a vigorous vetting process and then gaining the support of local party members.

 

Choosing policies

 

Too many party policy conventions are public relations exercises. Members are offered the illusion of engagement, and poorly defined policies often end up being embarrassing. Policies need to be well developed (along the lines of our existing policy process) and enjoy support from different regions of the country.

 

Party structure

 

A Council, with a representative from each province and territory, would manage the party in between Conventions and would meet at least three times per year.

 

Conventions would happen every two years and include elections for the party Steering Committee.

 

The Steering Committee, which is made up of the party president, vice-president, treasurer, secretary, and leader, would be elected by delegates to the Convention and manage the day-to-day operations of the party in between meetings of the Council.

 

The party’s Director would be hired by the Steering Committee, confirmed by the Council, and be responsible for managing any party staff.

 

Getting things going

 

Obviously, if we make the decision to start a new party, there will be a transition period to approve a constitution at the party’s first convention, etc. That process and timeline will be laid out in September.

 

Other areas of any party constitution must fall in line with Elections Canada rules defining signing officers for party accounts, a privacy policy, and similar things. Usually, those aren’t very contentious. If there are areas you think we should focus on, let us know!

 

Next, we need by-laws to cover details of leadership elections, candidate selections, disciplinary proceedings, and so on. Those can be passed and repealed as needed by the Steering Committee, Council, or Convention.

 

 

There, wasn’t that exciting?!

 

Again, please send any feedback by September 5th.

 

As much as I’m joking about this part of politics not being that exciting, we are talking about building a new structure. We need to get it right; no one wants to live in a house where the structure isn’t squared away.

 

Thank you again for being part of this effort to build something new. If this project goes ahead, it will be an uphill struggle. But you know what? I prefer a hard climb up over an easy slide down.

 

Thank you for caring about our country and for being ready to turn that care into action.

 

 

Dominic Cardy, MLA

Fredericton West-Hanwell, New Brunswick

Chair, Centre Ice Canadians Advisory Board

 

 

PS. If you’d like to help with our policy development process, please follow this link, and you can fill in the template we use to make sure policy ideas are necessary, costed, and justified.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nurses Take Job Action After Years of NDP Neglect

Image Credit:  BC Nurses Union BC nurses have reached a breaking point after years of unsafe conditions, rising violence in the workplace and a government that wouldn’t listen. Now they are on the picket line fighting to be heard. Last week, nurses began job action with a 72-hour strike notice, refusing non-essential overtime and stepping back from non-nursing duties. As of Tuesday, they have escalated to picket lines for the first time in decades. This moment was avoidable. It is the result of years of unanswered concerns from the frontline workers who keep our hospitals running. Nurses have been raising the same concerns for years: unsafe staffing levels, rising violence on the job, and a workload no single person should have to carry. None of it is new, and none of it should have taken a strike vote to get the government's attention. "Nurses are exercising their legal right to job action, but it shouldn’t have had to come to this," said Kiel Giddens, MLA for...

British Columbians Still Don’t Know Who’s Paying for NDP’s BC Hydro Deal

The NDP is making billion-dollar promises with BC Hydro, but British Columbians still don’t know who will pay the bill. Last week’s memorandum of understanding isn’t what the federal government and the NDP are making it out to be. It’s an admission that the NDP failed to make the long-term investments needed to keep B.C. powered. Now British Columbians have serious questions about the cost and whether BC Hydro ratepayers will end up paying the price. David L. Williams, MLA for Salmon Arm-Shuswap and Shadow Minister for BC Hydro and Electrical Energy Development , said British Columbians deserve clear answers about the full implications of the Canada–British Columbia Cooperative Prosperity Agreement. “British Columbians deserve the full truth,” said Mr. Williams. “This multi-billion-dollar announcement does not answer who pays for cost overruns, who pays for new generation, who carries the risk if industrial customers do not materialize, or whether ratepayers will be forced ...

NDP Government Blames Everyone but Themselves

The federal government has announced new measures to support British Columbia's forestry sector, including $65 million in funding for projects across the province. While any support is welcome, it falls far short of the level of assistance other provinces have secured for key industries. Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer says the NDP government needs to take responsibility for its mismanagement of B.C.’s forest industry instead of trying to pass on the blame. Despite promising to create more jobs in the forest sector, the NDP government has overseen the loss of thousands of forestry jobs and 21 mill closures which have devastated communities. “If Premier Eby spent more time addressing the regulatory issues impacting the forestry sector than he did complaining about the federal government, we would not be in the position we are now,” said Stamer. “And instead of trying to place the blame for mill closures on Donald Trump, Minister of Forests Ravi Parmar should t...

Labels

Show more