Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Conservative BC MLA Bruce Banman -- There isn’t enough places to process and clean the contaminated soil, nor are there enough inspectors to catch those dumping

 

Yesterday, I came across a story in the Vancouver Sun headlined, “Illegal dumping increasing on BC farmland” – the story stated that it’s  against the law to dump construction material on land reserved for farming but its increasingly being used as a cheaper alternative to authorized sites, which can charge more than $1,000 a load.

Bruce Banman, is an MLA in the area (Conservative BC – Abbotsford South), so yesterday afternoon I sent him a text asking about the problem.  Here’s what he had to say:


This is a huge problem -- and has been for a while.

Abbotsford does have a few gravel pits near the airport which after extracting the aggregate, take loads of clean soil which is tested and recorded; it is all monitored. So far, it seems to be improving agricultural land.

This system helped lower illegal dumps, but for some reason it has ramped up again. For a while a few First Nations had dumps for this kind of stuff (and still do), but they have either filled up, or have stopped.

In the case of the farmer wanting to add clean topsoil, my understanding is the red tape is horrendous. Keep in mind when they get a chance to add clean soil to improve farmland it’s often a last-minute thing depending on the site it comes from. The system doesn’t respond well to last minute very well.

One problem with the Agriculture Land Reserve (ALR) is what to do with marginal farmland, it could be improved with clean soil. But the ability to monitor the soil is inadequate.

Bottom line: There isn’t enough places to process and clean the contaminated soil, nor are there enough inspectors to catch those dumping.


Comments

  1. I am the Kelowna-Mission BC Conservative candidate in the upcoming election, and can attest that this is a huge issue in the Okanagan, as well. Municipal authorities are aware of dumping sites around Kelowna, and within the hills surrounding the valley, that are altering watercourses and drainage of farmable lands. From the vantage point of my farm I can see three agricultural properties violating ALC rules by (a) storing commercial equipment onsite, and (b) dumping fill, concrete, gravel and God knows what else (sometimes in the middle of the night, under cloak of darkness). The one ALC order of which I am aware that ordered fill to be removed was completely disregarded, and this fill (over 200 loads of dirt) remains on that site, permanently altering topography and creating flooding, dust and weeds on my property. This same property has been found by MOE to be leaching commercial waste into agricultural soil, but no government body has ordered this to cease, or for remediation to begin.
    It is extremely tiresome for law abiding farmers to constantly jump through regulatory hoops while they witness commercial tenants destroying neighbouring lands with little to no intervention (and presumably making a much more lucrative living than any farmer). I also note that, even when the MOE and the ALC issues warning letters and orders, commercial operations continue with abandon and, unfortunately with little enforcement. Regards, Alexandra (wright4bc.ca)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more