Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

GORDON F.D. WILSON: Giving Sound to the Silent Agenda


We have long-established and well-founded rules of conduct for those elected to public office, and, in the past, there has been a strict adherence to following them with severe consequences for those who break them.
 
That no longer applies today. Deals are cut for personal gain, blatant lies are told, and fake videos are presented as evidence. When reported, the news is greeted with a roll of the eyes or with a wink and nod of the head.
 
The MAGA doctrine is contemptuous of the law, written rules, and established past practice. It is attacking democratic institutions like an infestation of carpenter ants gnawing away at the framework of democratic governance. If left unattended, they will bring down the whole structure.
 
The spectacle in the United States should keep Canadians alert to the reality that this movement, their policies, and practices are spreading and alive within the Canadian political framework.
 
When Mark Carney was sworn in as Canada’s 24th Prime Minister, he said with humility that he would make mistakes.
 
With respect, I suggest perhaps unwittingly, he has already made two: permitting an unelected person to occupy Stornoway and accepting the Conservative narrative that Poilievre should be gifted the riding of Battle River—Crowfoot at the earliest possible call of a byelection.
 
On the surface, both issues seem trivial. They are not.
 
Mark Carney, the businessman, is new to his role as Prime Minister and politician, and I doubt he gave much thought to the Conservatives' demand to house an unelected Poilievre at Stornoway, complete with a car, driver, cook, cleaning staff, and house manager. Perhaps he thought it was a small concession that, if denied, would make him appear petty or partisan.
 
The problem is that it is illegal.
 
While Stornoway, the building and grounds, falls under the National Capital Commission, who is permitted to live in it is governed by the Official Residences Act, R.S.C., 1985, and Section 3 specifically states that it is reserved for “the person holding the recognized position of Leader of the Opposition in the House of Commons.”
 
Carney's challenges are monumental. From within a minority parliament, he must deal with an existential threat to this nation. His Team Canada approach to managing the external "Trump effect" is crucial, but he must not ignore the internal threats: that gnawing sound within the timbers of Canadian democracy. To do so may prove fatal.
 
Alberta separatists threaten Canada and must be taken seriously.
 
Donald Trump was not taken seriously when he first appeared on the political scene in the US, and most rational Americans didn’t believe that a convicted felon with such reprehensible moral conduct, complete contempt for the rules, and a thin grasp on reality would ever be elected President. But here we are.
 
Canadians made their choice in the last federal election and rejected the MAGA-type approach of Poilievre and his brand of conservatism. The fact that he refuses to go, and a core group of his supporters are going to great lengths and at taxpayer expense to make sure he stays, is concerning, especially as we see the head of the separatist serpent uncoiling in Alberta to activate plan B.


Well-known politicians spawned from the Western Canada Concept, Reform, Alliance, and United Conservative movements, such as Preston Manning, Stockwell Day, and Danielle Smith, have all taken the stage to resurrect discussion of the separatist agenda in Alberta.
 
Cunning, like the kid down the block who brings cartons of eggs to the gang’s clubhouse and incites the young members to throw them at the neighbourhood homes belonging to those they dislike, they are careful not to participate, and enhance their authority when they denounce the act and disavow the participants to the affected homeowners.
 
The Prime Minister should recognize this threat and use the byelection as an opportunity, a litmus test, where the views of Albertans, albeit in only one federal riding, can be aired on three critical issues: Alberta sovereignty, Indigenous treaty authority over resources, and Team Canada against Trump’s America.
 
According to the latest Angus Reid poll, 35% of Albertans and 65% of United Conservative Party voters support separation from Canada, and those constituents within Battle River—Crowfoot federally overwhelmingly support the UCP, provincially.
 
Prime Minister Carney’s obligations are to the Canadian people, not the Conservative Party or Mr. Poilievre. In the transactional world of business, getting to yes is all-important. In politics, especially given Poilievre’s well-documented track record, ensuring a no and trying at every opportunity to thwart and bring down the government is what Poilievre is all about.
 
With Alberta Premier Smith easing the rules for a referendum that threatens separation and internal polling that shows the majority of voters in Battle River—Crowfoot favour separatism, the Prime Minister has an obligation to all Canadians to make that question the top ballot issue.
Gifting an electoral riding in which the majority favour separatism to a man who is a pretender to the office of prime minister is seriously problematic.
 
Prime Minister Carney should take his time before setting the date for a byelection so that those who support separation from Canada can organize, perhaps by changing the Independence Party of Alberta from a provincial to a federal focus. They should run a candidate, much as the Bloc does in Quebec, and put their case before the electors of Battle River—Crowfoot and, by so doing, Canadians at large.
The constituents of The Battle River—Crowfoot have received appalling treatment that underscores what Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has recently said is fueling separatists, that “Albertans are tired of being told by the powers in Ottawa to sit down, be quiet, and take it.”
 
And Smith, in this instance, is correct. That is exactly what happened to voters in Battle River—Crowfoot.
 
Within days of electing long-time local community advocate Damien Kurek, he was removed, and the Ottawa-based conservatives told the voters of Battle River—Crowfoot they must elect a person who has, for the last twenty years, represented an Ontario riding. And those Ottawa-based conservatives’ contempt for the Alberta voters was in full display when their vote was taken for granted to the extent that Poilievre’s move out of Stornoway wasn’t considered necessary.
 
The priority given to accommodating Poilievre in Stornoway, which is illegal, and forcing a $1.95 million byelection to impose a career politician from Ontario on the constituents of Battle River—Crowfoot has nothing to do with good governance. It copies the Trump-formulated “personality leadership” style that commits to a silent agenda that is planned for Canadians and ensures Poilievre stays on the taxpayer-funded gravy train.
 
Canadians must stay alert to the actions of those who chew away at the framework of our democracy, force them into the light of day, and demand that they run a candidate in the by-election when it is called. They should be forced to argue their case in detail, not hide behind a meaningless yes or no referendum.
 
If Alberta separatists win a seat, it will be a clarion call to Canada, much as the election of the Bloc members from Quebec did in 1993. 
 
Canada responded to that call, resulting in a stronger country. Alternatively, we may discover that when faced with the real consequences that will come with separation from Canada, complete with the legal complexities of Indigenous Treaty lands, Albertans will step forward and prove themselves to be who most Canadians believe they are: important and equal partners in the best country in the world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

Labels

Show more