Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: The idea that solitary confinement is always a form of punishment is simply not true


Liberals set to amend solitary confinement rules in wake of dual court calls for action
Amanda Connolly ~~ National Online Journalist / Global News ~~ October 15, 2018

Canada’s Minister of Public Safety and
Emergency Preparedness, Ralph Goodale,
is the MP for the Regina- Wascana riding
The federal Liberals are set to introduce a new bill tackling the issue of administrative segregation, more commonly known as solitary confinement.  A bill was put on the notice paper on Oct. 11, which is how the government gives notice that it intends to table legislation in the House of Commons…

… it is not clear at this time what new limits or bans the new bill could put in place on the use of solitary confinement.

The federal government introduced a bill in June 2017 … however, that bill never made it past first reading and has wallowed in legislative purgatory ever since… a series of legal challenges that came after it have resulted in court rulings that strict limits are needed and that using solitary confinement long-term is unconstitutional.

A government official …  acknowledged there have been concerns raised repeatedly by justice advocates over the last year and a half that the language in the existing bill does not fully address the concerns raised in two significant court rulings that have come since.

… an Ontario Superior Court judge also deemed the long-term use of solitary confinement in federal prisons unconstitutional.

He called for much stricter limits of no more than five days in order to prevent psychological harm to the offender.

To read full story CLICK HERE:

I don’t suppose the jurors have ever considered that they are not legislators, or that prisoners are not the most reliable judges of what constitutes psychological abuse.

Some prisoners are isolated due to their crimes; for example, child molesters are unlikely to survive in general population and will be most likely be killed. Others are in debt from gambling, or from illicit drug use, and will meet an untimely death if not protected.


Then there are the psychopaths who gain separation by attacking and harming other inmates. We also have dangerous criminals who will not hesitate to murder again. Once they are sentences to life without parole for 25 years, they have little to lose, and are thus more dangerous than most.

There is considerable difference between provincial jails, where convicted persons serve sentences less than two years, and federal prisons where convicted persons serve sentences of two years or more. That is where the sentencing term “two years less a day” comes from – the judge is deciding to send a convicted person to a provincial jail rather than a federal prison.

The proposed legislation has numerous unintended consequences, and if passed will see some lives lost when prison officials are required to release an inmate from solitary confinement. The idea that solitary confinement is always a form of punishment is simply not true.

There are instances where tempers flare, a fight breaks out and combatants are temporarily confined to allow tempers to cool, and second thoughts to rule. Those confined are likely to consider the confinement to be punishment, but without intervention and serious harm taking place, one of the combatants would face assault charges and most likely an extension of his sentence.

Others, as cited above, will kill or be killed with whatever devices are available. It will not be humane or pretty. Of course, judges never have to deal with a prisoner stabbed multiple times with home-made knives, or strangled with an appliance cord, or gang raped, or simply beaten to death.

This is a case where ideology and reality clash and pushing ideology will have dire consequences.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more