Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: The idea that solitary confinement is always a form of punishment is simply not true


Liberals set to amend solitary confinement rules in wake of dual court calls for action
Amanda Connolly ~~ National Online Journalist / Global News ~~ October 15, 2018

Canada’s Minister of Public Safety and
Emergency Preparedness, Ralph Goodale,
is the MP for the Regina- Wascana riding
The federal Liberals are set to introduce a new bill tackling the issue of administrative segregation, more commonly known as solitary confinement.  A bill was put on the notice paper on Oct. 11, which is how the government gives notice that it intends to table legislation in the House of Commons…

… it is not clear at this time what new limits or bans the new bill could put in place on the use of solitary confinement.

The federal government introduced a bill in June 2017 … however, that bill never made it past first reading and has wallowed in legislative purgatory ever since… a series of legal challenges that came after it have resulted in court rulings that strict limits are needed and that using solitary confinement long-term is unconstitutional.

A government official …  acknowledged there have been concerns raised repeatedly by justice advocates over the last year and a half that the language in the existing bill does not fully address the concerns raised in two significant court rulings that have come since.

… an Ontario Superior Court judge also deemed the long-term use of solitary confinement in federal prisons unconstitutional.

He called for much stricter limits of no more than five days in order to prevent psychological harm to the offender.

To read full story CLICK HERE:

I don’t suppose the jurors have ever considered that they are not legislators, or that prisoners are not the most reliable judges of what constitutes psychological abuse.

Some prisoners are isolated due to their crimes; for example, child molesters are unlikely to survive in general population and will be most likely be killed. Others are in debt from gambling, or from illicit drug use, and will meet an untimely death if not protected.


Then there are the psychopaths who gain separation by attacking and harming other inmates. We also have dangerous criminals who will not hesitate to murder again. Once they are sentences to life without parole for 25 years, they have little to lose, and are thus more dangerous than most.

There is considerable difference between provincial jails, where convicted persons serve sentences less than two years, and federal prisons where convicted persons serve sentences of two years or more. That is where the sentencing term “two years less a day” comes from – the judge is deciding to send a convicted person to a provincial jail rather than a federal prison.

The proposed legislation has numerous unintended consequences, and if passed will see some lives lost when prison officials are required to release an inmate from solitary confinement. The idea that solitary confinement is always a form of punishment is simply not true.

There are instances where tempers flare, a fight breaks out and combatants are temporarily confined to allow tempers to cool, and second thoughts to rule. Those confined are likely to consider the confinement to be punishment, but without intervention and serious harm taking place, one of the combatants would face assault charges and most likely an extension of his sentence.

Others, as cited above, will kill or be killed with whatever devices are available. It will not be humane or pretty. Of course, judges never have to deal with a prisoner stabbed multiple times with home-made knives, or strangled with an appliance cord, or gang raped, or simply beaten to death.

This is a case where ideology and reality clash and pushing ideology will have dire consequences.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more