Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Why would our Prime Minister undermine negotiations before they happen? … what emerges is a government in disarray


Liberals won’t appeal Trans Mountain ruling, name former justice to oversee new Indigenous consultations
~~
Amanda Connolly  ~~  Global News  ~~  October 3, 2018

The Liberals will not appeal a court ruling that found they failed to adequately consult with Indigenous stakeholders on the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.  Natural Resources Minister Amarjeet Sohi made the announcement Wednesday morning in Ottawa.

Speaking to reporters, Sohi said the government will redo consultations with all 117 Indigenous groups affected by the project.  Former Supreme Court justice Frank Iacobucci has also been appointed to oversee these new consultations.

In August, a Federal Court ruling hit the brakes on the Trans Mountain expansion project, which will triple the capacity of an existing pipeline to carry crude oil to the BC coast.  That ruling flagged two major issues with the project: first, that the initial approval by the National Energy Board was fundamentally flawed for not considering the impact of the expansion and increased tanker traffic on marine ecosystems and second, that the current Liberal government failed in its duty to consult adequately during the latest Phase 3 round of talks with Indigenous communities.

For full story CLICK HERE:

The flaw in pipeline assessment is regulations that requires upstream, and downstream, assessment of product moved in a pipeline. That is ridiculous overkill and rationally unsupportable.

Upstream are production facilities; those producers who pull up raw product from the ground. All of them are separately assessed and face regulations on their operation designed to minimize carbon emissions.


Downstream are the operations that will use products moved by pipelines, again regulated by governments respecting carbon emissions if resident in Canada. If the operation is in a foreign country, downstream assessment is ridiculous.

If we are competing in an open market, we cannot refuse to export to a given nation because it is not on the climate change reduction plan. Under that thinking, we cannot export to the USA as it has withdrawn from the Paris accord.

It takes a wondrous flight of fancy to decide that the National Energy Board (NEB) must consider how the Trans Mountain pipeline project will influence tanker traffic, and the whale population, on west cost. Protection of marine species is under the Natural Resources and Oceans and Fisheries departments. That is already regulated.  Furthermore, tanker traffic along with huge container ships and ocean liners, are regulated as all have substantial stores of motive fuel and lubricants that can result in damaging spills.

Protection of coastal waters against accidental spills employs known technology.  The higher the risk, the more need for adequate equipment and crews trained to deal with containing and cleaning up a spill.  Whether that spill originated from an overturned rail car, a barge which has run aground, a boat or ship hitting a reef or the shore -- action is required. That role is usually carried out by the Coast Guard with assistance from specialist private contractors.

The article above is disconcerting:
“Where possible, the government will try to offer accommodations to indigenous communities to relieve their concerns.  But if groups remain opposed after the government has fulfilled its consultation requirements, it will still go forward.”

Why would Prime Minister Justin Trudeau undermine negotiations before they happen? That is not good faith dealing, that will advance reconciliation. The well is poisoned before the first water is drawn.  
 
What emerges is a government in disarray ... having several departments and agencies tripping over one another is inane. 

Concerns dealing with marine species, and ocean traffic, are dealt with by appropriate departments. Allow them to fulfill their mandates without interference from the National Energy Board.

Too many cooks produce an inedible stew.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more