Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Why would our Prime Minister undermine negotiations before they happen? … what emerges is a government in disarray


Liberals won’t appeal Trans Mountain ruling, name former justice to oversee new Indigenous consultations
~~ Amanda Connolly  ~~  Global News  ~~  October 3, 2018

The Liberals will not appeal a court ruling that found they failed to adequately consult with Indigenous stakeholders on the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.  Natural Resources Minister Amarjeet Sohi made the announcement Wednesday morning in Ottawa.

Speaking to reporters, Sohi said the government will redo consultations with all 117 Indigenous groups affected by the project.  Former Supreme Court justice Frank Iacobucci has also been appointed to oversee these new consultations.

In August, a Federal Court ruling hit the brakes on the Trans Mountain expansion project, which will triple the capacity of an existing pipeline to carry crude oil to the BC coast.  That ruling flagged two major issues with the project: first, that the initial approval by the National Energy Board was fundamentally flawed for not considering the impact of the expansion and increased tanker traffic on marine ecosystems and second, that the current Liberal government failed in its duty to consult adequately during the latest Phase 3 round of talks with Indigenous communities.

For full story CLICK HERE:

The flaw in pipeline assessment is regulations that requires upstream, and downstream, assessment of product moved in a pipeline. That is ridiculous overkill and rationally unsupportable.

Upstream are production facilities; those producers who pull up raw product from the ground. All of them are separately assessed and face regulations on their operation designed to minimize carbon emissions.


Downstream are the operations that will use products moved by pipelines, again regulated by governments respecting carbon emissions if resident in Canada. If the operation is in a foreign country, downstream assessment is ridiculous.

If we are competing in an open market, we cannot refuse to export to a given nation because it is not on the climate change reduction plan. Under that thinking, we cannot export to the USA as it has withdrawn from the Paris accord.

It takes a wondrous flight of fancy to decide that the National Energy Board (NEB) must consider how the Trans Mountain pipeline project will influence tanker traffic, and the whale population, on west cost. Protection of marine species is under the Natural Resources and Oceans and Fisheries departments. That is already regulated.  Furthermore, tanker traffic along with huge container ships and ocean liners, are regulated as all have substantial stores of motive fuel and lubricants that can result in damaging spills.

Protection of coastal waters against accidental spills employs known technology.  The higher the risk, the more need for adequate equipment and crews trained to deal with containing and cleaning up a spill.  Whether that spill originated from an overturned rail car, a barge which has run aground, a boat or ship hitting a reef or the shore -- action is required. That role is usually carried out by the Coast Guard with assistance from specialist private contractors.

The article above is disconcerting:
“Where possible, the government will try to offer accommodations to indigenous communities to relieve their concerns.  But if groups remain opposed after the government has fulfilled its consultation requirements, it will still go forward.”

Why would Prime Minister Justin Trudeau undermine negotiations before they happen? That is not good faith dealing, that will advance reconciliation. The well is poisoned before the first water is drawn.  
 
What emerges is a government in disarray ... having several departments and agencies tripping over one another is inane. 

Concerns dealing with marine species, and ocean traffic, are dealt with by appropriate departments. Allow them to fulfill their mandates without interference from the National Energy Board.

Too many cooks produce an inedible stew.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more