Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Why would our Prime Minister undermine negotiations before they happen? … what emerges is a government in disarray


Liberals won’t appeal Trans Mountain ruling, name former justice to oversee new Indigenous consultations
~~
Amanda Connolly  ~~  Global News  ~~  October 3, 2018

The Liberals will not appeal a court ruling that found they failed to adequately consult with Indigenous stakeholders on the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.  Natural Resources Minister Amarjeet Sohi made the announcement Wednesday morning in Ottawa.

Speaking to reporters, Sohi said the government will redo consultations with all 117 Indigenous groups affected by the project.  Former Supreme Court justice Frank Iacobucci has also been appointed to oversee these new consultations.

In August, a Federal Court ruling hit the brakes on the Trans Mountain expansion project, which will triple the capacity of an existing pipeline to carry crude oil to the BC coast.  That ruling flagged two major issues with the project: first, that the initial approval by the National Energy Board was fundamentally flawed for not considering the impact of the expansion and increased tanker traffic on marine ecosystems and second, that the current Liberal government failed in its duty to consult adequately during the latest Phase 3 round of talks with Indigenous communities.

For full story CLICK HERE:

The flaw in pipeline assessment is regulations that requires upstream, and downstream, assessment of product moved in a pipeline. That is ridiculous overkill and rationally unsupportable.

Upstream are production facilities; those producers who pull up raw product from the ground. All of them are separately assessed and face regulations on their operation designed to minimize carbon emissions.


Downstream are the operations that will use products moved by pipelines, again regulated by governments respecting carbon emissions if resident in Canada. If the operation is in a foreign country, downstream assessment is ridiculous.

If we are competing in an open market, we cannot refuse to export to a given nation because it is not on the climate change reduction plan. Under that thinking, we cannot export to the USA as it has withdrawn from the Paris accord.

It takes a wondrous flight of fancy to decide that the National Energy Board (NEB) must consider how the Trans Mountain pipeline project will influence tanker traffic, and the whale population, on west cost. Protection of marine species is under the Natural Resources and Oceans and Fisheries departments. That is already regulated.  Furthermore, tanker traffic along with huge container ships and ocean liners, are regulated as all have substantial stores of motive fuel and lubricants that can result in damaging spills.

Protection of coastal waters against accidental spills employs known technology.  The higher the risk, the more need for adequate equipment and crews trained to deal with containing and cleaning up a spill.  Whether that spill originated from an overturned rail car, a barge which has run aground, a boat or ship hitting a reef or the shore -- action is required. That role is usually carried out by the Coast Guard with assistance from specialist private contractors.

The article above is disconcerting:
“Where possible, the government will try to offer accommodations to indigenous communities to relieve their concerns.  But if groups remain opposed after the government has fulfilled its consultation requirements, it will still go forward.”

Why would Prime Minister Justin Trudeau undermine negotiations before they happen? That is not good faith dealing, that will advance reconciliation. The well is poisoned before the first water is drawn.  
 
What emerges is a government in disarray ... having several departments and agencies tripping over one another is inane. 

Concerns dealing with marine species, and ocean traffic, are dealt with by appropriate departments. Allow them to fulfill their mandates without interference from the National Energy Board.

Too many cooks produce an inedible stew.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more