Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: They have started down the same path of failure, while making many people needlessly uncomfortable in the process


Legalization of cannabis is one of the worst mistakes made by our current government.

For decades cannabis (marijuana) has been in widespread use from public schools, to the hallowed halls of justice and parliament. Everyone who wanted to experiment knew someone, who knew someone, who could provide access.

Many people, young and old, were introduced to pot in a social setting, asked to ‘try this, you’ll like it’. There is something risqué about doing something prohibited. For most, indulging in pot was occasional and recreational. Others used pot more frequently and some made it a daily habit.

Frequent users, mostly through fear of being caught with an illegal substance on their person, or in their homes, lobbied government to decriminalize low quantities of pot. Others demanded that pot be legalized to serve their personal desires.

During the 2015 federal election campaign, Justin Trudeau announced that if his Liberal Party was elected to govern, he would legalize cannabis. His party was elected, but legalization was not immediate. It took about a year and a half for a legalization Bill to be introduced (April 13, 2017), and Pot was to become legal on July 1, 2018.

All hell broke loose. Every politician at provincial and civic level felt an obligation to exercise control over what was to be a legal drug. There was a huge outcry that we would find drivers high on pot, and that we had to protect the children at all costs.

None of them gave a hoot when cannabis was illegal.

Public school students were using pot and people were driving high. None of them cared enough to admit illegal use was rampant and needed attention. No studied were done on public health and safety risks.

Employers and landlords have jumped on the band wagon and, along with politicians, are creating ridiculous rules for cannabis use. None of them care about our health, safety or well-being; they are drunk on the opportunity to exercise control over others.


They overlook the resilience of criminals and the public. When cannabis was illegal they tried to stamp out its use and failed miserably. Collectively, they decided to look the other way and ignore cannabis use.

They have started down the same path of failure, while making many people needlessly uncomfortable in the process. They are trying to link cannabis control to tobacco control which has failed to stamp out smoking. A hard core of over five million Canadian continue to smoke despite ridiculous prices, and even more ridiculous rules on where they can smoke.



In the meantime, politicians have been ignoring the growing use of highly addictive and potentially deadly synthetic opioids. Combating drug use requires public education, and the education requires sound scientific studies. Faux studies and dire warnings don’t work. Tobacco regulation has proved that.

Next week cannabis, as a result of the passing of Bill C-45 (The Cannabis Act: An Act respecting cannabis and to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, the Criminal Code and other Acts), will be legal in Canada despite no one, at any level of government, understanding its effects on humans.

We don’t even know what levels of use are safe.

We do not know its effects on developing youth.

We can detect levels of cannabis in blood samples but have no means of interpreting what they mean.

We are flying into the unknown, blind and dumb and will, like other jurisdictions that have legalized cannabis, face numerous unintended consequences, none of them positive for our society.

Legalization will not deter the criminal element. All it has done is legitimize investors, growers and producers who are technically criminals at present.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more