Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Now upon reading this, would you think the same as I did? The government plans to provide funding to help with transit difficulties in the lower mainland?


I’d like you to take a minute to read the following headline, from a BC Government media release sent out today …

Province helps fund Metro Vancouver transit and transportation improvements

Now upon reading this, would you think the same as I did?  The government plans to provide new funding to help with transit difficulties in the lower mainland? 

If that is indeed what you thought, like me, we’d both be wrong.

No, instead here is what is actually happening.

The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, headed by the Honourable Selina Robinson, has proposed changes ('changes' = tax increases) to the Parking Rights Tax – and that is what will help TransLink fund major transit and transportation improvements to keep people and goods moving quickly, safely and affordably in Metro Vancouver.

Apparently, TransLink has projected that the increases to the Parking Rights Tax will bring in and additional $10 million a year in new revenue from what they are calling a minor increase to the Parking Rights Tax.


Hmmmm … $10 million dollars in additional taxes doesn’t sound like a minor increase to me!

Proposed legislative changes by the provincial NDP government will allow TransLink to increase the Parking Rights Tax — a sales tax paid by people buying off-street parking in Metro Vancouver — from the current 21% to a maximum of 24% -- and costing consumers an additional 15 cents on $5 of parking.

So there you have it … YES, the provincial government are helping fund Metro Vancouver transit and transportation improvements.  However, in the case of this specific government media release, the additional monies being used to fund transit in the lower mainland are actually coming from new fees being imposed on drivers.

Sadly, with so many community newspapers being gobbled up by large companies, and then those companies slashing the number of reporters on staff and able to gather and verify news stories, what we are seeing are government news releases being printed word-for-word as if they were actual news.

That may indeed be accurate in some cases, however who do we have checking that for us?

In Kamloops, I’m Alan Forseth, and I hope you’ll join the discussion on this, or any other topic presented here.  Do you agree … disagree?  Post your thoughts in the Comment Section directly below.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more