Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN: My question is to the Minister of Agriculture ... “Will she consider looking at the incentive structures provided to farmers in B.C. in relation to preserving ecological values on ALR land?”


I'm a passionate advocate for protecting agricultural land. And I'm pleased to be able to work with Minister Lana Popham to strengthen the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) Act.

But, within the ALC Act is a critical gap with respect to wetlands, water quality (and volume) and protecting our watersheds.

Currently the ALC Act allows for, and encourages, draining wetlands to increase access to agricultural production. As droughts increase in frequency and severity we are going to have to protect our watersheds with the same level of vigour as we protect food producing land.

There is no question these conflicts test us. I had the opportunity to ask Minster of Agriculture, Hon. Lana Popham, about these issues.

Transcript

A. Olsen:
In recognition of World Water Day last week, I stand to ask about an issue that has long troubled me.

For the most part, the (Agricultural Land Reserve) ALR protects arable land from urban sprawl. But within its laudable and important purpose, it contains a critical environmental flaw. The ALC Act allows and encourages the draining and filling of ALR land. While this may provide agricultural benefit, it can also destroy wetlands that have immense ecological value. They are critical to our ecological circulatory system, storing and filtering water and controlling volume and quality in our watersheds. There are no provisions within the ALC Act that allow these values to be recognized on agricultural land.

My question is to the Minister of Agriculture. We agree with the critical importance of protecting and defending food-producing land, but we must ensure that agricultural activities are not jeopardizing other important ecological habitats. Has the minister considered implementing regulations to support the preservation of other ecological values on ALR land?


Hon. L. Popham:

Agriculture Minister Lana Popham
Thank you for the very important question from the member.

Our government knows that wetlands provide a critical habitat for fish, birds and other wildlife and, in fact, make up about 5 percent of our land base in this province. We know how important it is to have healthy wetlands. Often these wetlands are in an agricultural setting.

I've been very happy to be working with and hearing about programs where ranchers and farmers are actually embracing the idea of having natural ecosystems working with their farms and, in fact, making a healthier farming setting as well.

I'd be happy to talk to the member about a specific program called Farmland Advantage that's happening up in the Cariboo area. Basically, it took a wetland that had been farmed for quite some time. There were not very many wild birds or animals in this wetland area. The farmer embraced that and has now brought back those critical birds and animals into that area. He's also an incredible rancher. And so there are ways that we can work together with agricultural and natural areas, and I'm really happy to have that conversation with the member.

Mr. Speaker:
Member, Saanich North and the Islands on a supplemental.

A. Olsen:
Thank you to the minister. The governance of the ALR needs to recognize that ecological values are valuable to society and should also be protected. I'm happy to hear the example of the individual that's taken this, but I think that it's important that it's captured within the governance of the ALR.

For thousands of years, these wetlands were an essential part of the local landscape. It's a place where animals, birds and plants thrive, as the minister acknowledged. It's an ancient supermarket of sorts for my WSÁNEĆ ancestors that harvested foods and materials there that were important for their quality of life.

But there's a problem with the incentives. There's a constant battle with nature that could easily be solved if the preservation of specific ecological values were given tax credits like the production of the small amount that is currently captured within the legislation. Maintaining wetland habitats should be recognized as an allowed non-farm use, and draining wetlands should require explicit permission from the ALC.

My question is to the Minister of Agriculture. Will she consider looking at the incentive structures provided to farmers in B.C. in relation to preserving ecological values on ALR land?

Hon. L. Popham:

Point taken by the member. It's an excellent point. I think there's been more and more discussion about the value of ecological goods and services with agricultural land in natural areas. The Agricultural Land Commission does recognize the importance of wetlands, and that is why there are functioning wetlands that are happening on agricultural land reserve farms right now.

We also have an environmental farm plan program through my ministry that works with farmers who want to work with these wetlands and natural areas.

So, let's have a chat. Let's have coffee later, and we can discuss how we can make that work better.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more