Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN: My question is to the Minister of Agriculture ... “Will she consider looking at the incentive structures provided to farmers in B.C. in relation to preserving ecological values on ALR land?”


I'm a passionate advocate for protecting agricultural land. And I'm pleased to be able to work with Minister Lana Popham to strengthen the Agricultural Land Commission (ALC) Act.

But, within the ALC Act is a critical gap with respect to wetlands, water quality (and volume) and protecting our watersheds.

Currently the ALC Act allows for, and encourages, draining wetlands to increase access to agricultural production. As droughts increase in frequency and severity we are going to have to protect our watersheds with the same level of vigour as we protect food producing land.

There is no question these conflicts test us. I had the opportunity to ask Minster of Agriculture, Hon. Lana Popham, about these issues.

Transcript

A. Olsen:
In recognition of World Water Day last week, I stand to ask about an issue that has long troubled me.

For the most part, the (Agricultural Land Reserve) ALR protects arable land from urban sprawl. But within its laudable and important purpose, it contains a critical environmental flaw. The ALC Act allows and encourages the draining and filling of ALR land. While this may provide agricultural benefit, it can also destroy wetlands that have immense ecological value. They are critical to our ecological circulatory system, storing and filtering water and controlling volume and quality in our watersheds. There are no provisions within the ALC Act that allow these values to be recognized on agricultural land.

My question is to the Minister of Agriculture. We agree with the critical importance of protecting and defending food-producing land, but we must ensure that agricultural activities are not jeopardizing other important ecological habitats. Has the minister considered implementing regulations to support the preservation of other ecological values on ALR land?


Hon. L. Popham:

Agriculture Minister Lana Popham
Thank you for the very important question from the member.

Our government knows that wetlands provide a critical habitat for fish, birds and other wildlife and, in fact, make up about 5 percent of our land base in this province. We know how important it is to have healthy wetlands. Often these wetlands are in an agricultural setting.

I've been very happy to be working with and hearing about programs where ranchers and farmers are actually embracing the idea of having natural ecosystems working with their farms and, in fact, making a healthier farming setting as well.

I'd be happy to talk to the member about a specific program called Farmland Advantage that's happening up in the Cariboo area. Basically, it took a wetland that had been farmed for quite some time. There were not very many wild birds or animals in this wetland area. The farmer embraced that and has now brought back those critical birds and animals into that area. He's also an incredible rancher. And so there are ways that we can work together with agricultural and natural areas, and I'm really happy to have that conversation with the member.

Mr. Speaker:
Member, Saanich North and the Islands on a supplemental.

A. Olsen:
Thank you to the minister. The governance of the ALR needs to recognize that ecological values are valuable to society and should also be protected. I'm happy to hear the example of the individual that's taken this, but I think that it's important that it's captured within the governance of the ALR.

For thousands of years, these wetlands were an essential part of the local landscape. It's a place where animals, birds and plants thrive, as the minister acknowledged. It's an ancient supermarket of sorts for my WSÁNEĆ ancestors that harvested foods and materials there that were important for their quality of life.

But there's a problem with the incentives. There's a constant battle with nature that could easily be solved if the preservation of specific ecological values were given tax credits like the production of the small amount that is currently captured within the legislation. Maintaining wetland habitats should be recognized as an allowed non-farm use, and draining wetlands should require explicit permission from the ALC.

My question is to the Minister of Agriculture. Will she consider looking at the incentive structures provided to farmers in B.C. in relation to preserving ecological values on ALR land?

Hon. L. Popham:

Point taken by the member. It's an excellent point. I think there's been more and more discussion about the value of ecological goods and services with agricultural land in natural areas. The Agricultural Land Commission does recognize the importance of wetlands, and that is why there are functioning wetlands that are happening on agricultural land reserve farms right now.

We also have an environmental farm plan program through my ministry that works with farmers who want to work with these wetlands and natural areas.

So, let's have a chat. Let's have coffee later, and we can discuss how we can make that work better.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more