Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Political cronyism appears to be a small world. The longer this goes on the worse it smells


Crown waited 2 years to charge federal procurement official with links to Mark Norman case.  Crown accuses Matthew Matchett and Vice-Admiral Mark Norman of separately leaking cabinet secrets
Murray Brewster ~~ CBC News ~~ Mar 19, 2019

A federal procurement official charged with breach of trust was told by the RCMP roughly two years ago that he also was a suspect in the same investigation into the alleged leaking of cabinet secrets which had ensnared .

Matthew Matchett's lawyer, Matthew Day, revealed that fact in court Tuesday as a date for a preliminary hearing was set in an Ontario Court of Justice.

Marchett was charged with one count of breach of trust on Feb. 13, while Norman, the former commander of the navy, also faces one count of breach of trust and was charged in April 2018.

Day tore a strip off the Crown saying his client has yet to see all of the evidence gathered against him despite the time it has taken to investigate.  

CLICK HERE to read the full story:


It is no surprise that the Admiral Norman preliminary hearing set for August has been moved to much later -- after the October election.

It is a surprise that a second person is accused of leaking the same shipbuilding ‘secrets’ Norman is accused of leaking. Why did it take two years for that to come out?

Those who have followed the Norman development, know that the government has been reluctant to disclose evidence held against Admiral Norman. Full disclosure is a fundamental principle of our criminal justice system, and a few people convicted of murder have been freed because of the prosecution failure to disclose relevant detains to the defense.

We would have less interest in the Norman affair except for what has been revealed, and not revealed, during the n scandal.

That started the ball rolling.

Since the story broke on the PMO pressuring the Attorney General, we have had numerous revelations:


  • The Prime Minister told us that the Globe and Mail story on pressuring the Attorney General was baseless.

  • the Commons Justice Committee undertook and investigation into Lavalin.

  • Jody Wilson-Raybould spoke to the CJC and made it clear there had been pressure. She mentioned that Wernick had told her there was a possibility that Lavalin might leave Quebec without a DPA.

  • Privy Council Clerk Wernick spoke to the CJC and confirmed conversations and communications had taken place but were not pressure as the government had just reason for speaking to the AG.

  • During his comments to the CJC, Wernick let it drop that Wilson-Raybould had issued an order to Justice Department staff not to aggressively defend against indigenous legal actions which is odd since it is entirely separate from the Lavalin scandal.

  • Gerald Butts spoke to the CJC, again confirming that communications with the AG had taken place but were misconstrued as pressure since the government had just cause for communicating.

  • The Prime Minister assured us that his interest was in preserving (Lavalin) jobs.

  • The President of SNC-Lavalin maintains that Lavalin jobs were never discussed with the government and that SNC-Lavalin had no intention of leaving Quebec.

  • We discover that there is a second person charged in leaking secrets in the Admiral Norman affair.

  • We now discover that there were apparent tensions between the AG and PMO dating back to 2017.

  • We discover that Senate Committee on Transport and Communications is curtailing its visits to ensure that most testimony it receives is from coastal supporters of C-48.

  • Two senior Cabinet Ministers have resigned their posts. A third Liberal MP has resigned to sit as an independent.

  • We now find Wilson-Raybould is alleged to have promoted a Manitoba judge as replacement for Beverly McLaughlin, as Chief Justice on the Supreme Court, except that Justice Glenn Joyal had withdrawn his application to sit on the Supreme Court.


The legal community is in an uproar over the breach of confidentiality of the appointment process for judges.   

We have discovered interesting links between the Trudeau Foundation, SNC-Lavalin, McCain Foods, the Bronfmans and government Ministers. Political cronyism appears to be a small world.

The longer this goes on the worse it smells. The idea that the AG may have interfered with the administration of justice adds another potential scandal to those already on the boil.

This gets worse, not better, as time passes. 

The Justice Committee has been shut down ... the Ethics Committee has been shut down ... the Prime Minister answers pertinent questions with a script written by his lawyers ... we are united ... all is well ... we are doing our best for you ... nothing to report that you don’t already know.

Move along.

The problem for most of us it that we have a wealth of unproven allegations to confound us.

To quote Sir Winston Churchill: “It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.”

We will not ‘move along’. We are not subjugated slaves. We will dump corruption and cronyism to save Canada. We will do whatever it takes by whatever means it takes.  


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more