Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: The real issue, which the Prime Minster refuses to address, is whether or not we want to allow political interference in the administration of justice



Globe and Mail ~~ March 7th, 2019

Prime Minster Justin Trudeau says he didn’t realize there was an “erosion of trust” between his office and former attorney-general Jody Wilson-Raybould over the fall of 2018 and acknowledged he should have realized this was taking place.

The Prime Minister used an early morning press conference to speak at length about the political crisis that has engulfed his government over the past month and triggered the resignation of one of his most senior aides and two cabinet ministers including Ms. Wilson-Raybould.

He offered no apologies for what has taken place, acknowledged no wrongdoing in what has unfolded since ...

CLICK HERE to read to full story:


Mr. Trudeau is skating on the edges of the SNC-Lavalin affair, confining his comments to the internal chaos in the PMO while avoiding the real issues which are government efforts to mitigate the legal problems for a Quebec based construction firm accused of some and convicted of some criminal activities.

Claiming that saving jobs is the reason for supporting SNC Lavalin is not credible. This government sat on its hands while 12,000 Sears Canada employees were thrown out of work and over 50,000 oil and gas workers were thrown out of work.

Saving jobs is not a just cause for interfering in our criminal justice system. We have an independent Public Prosecution Service of Canada precisely to avoid political interference in criminal prosecutions.


The Public Prosecution Service of Canada (PPSC) is a national, independent and accountable prosecuting authority whose main objective is to prosecute federal offences and provides legal advice and assistance to law enforcement.  https://www.ppsc-sppc.gc.ca/eng/bas/index.html

The Director is Deputy Attorney General. The Attorney General has authority to review prosecutions and can override the PPSC, but if he or she does, must publish the decision for all to see.

That is precisely where the conflict lays.

The Prime Minister pointed out the terms of a deferred prosecution agreement allow it to be set up even in the last minutes of a trial.

The Attorney General has to decide whether or not allowing a deferred prosecution is in the public interest. It is not a political decision. Trudeau, through the PMO, was insisting the Attorney General should make a political decision, considering potential job losses and other political issues.

The real issue, which the Prime Minster refuses to address, is whether or not we want to allow political interference in the administration of justice.

My reaction is ‘no’ – a thousand times ‘no’! We do not want politicians deciding which criminal cases will be prosecuted in accordance with our laws and which cases will be given special treatment.

It is a very short step from granting special treatment for some corporations facing criminal charges to asking the PPSC to investigate corporations and individuals the government dislikes. Political interference in justice is a double-edged sword that can help or harm.

This government has failed to make a reasonable case for why we should accept a change to our criminal code that allows for deferred prosecution agreements. The change in the criminal code has not been properly scrutinized and all ramifications considered by the Commons and Senate.

The government made changes to the Criminal Code through an end run around the Commons Justice Committee and the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee by including the changes in a Finance Department Bill. That is unacceptable cloak and dagger behaviour the government must answer for.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more