Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: The real issue, which the Prime Minster refuses to address, is whether or not we want to allow political interference in the administration of justice



Globe and Mail ~~ March 7th, 2019

Prime Minster Justin Trudeau says he didn’t realize there was an “erosion of trust” between his office and former attorney-general Jody Wilson-Raybould over the fall of 2018 and acknowledged he should have realized this was taking place.

The Prime Minister used an early morning press conference to speak at length about the political crisis that has engulfed his government over the past month and triggered the resignation of one of his most senior aides and two cabinet ministers including Ms. Wilson-Raybould.

He offered no apologies for what has taken place, acknowledged no wrongdoing in what has unfolded since ...

CLICK HERE to read to full story:


Mr. Trudeau is skating on the edges of the SNC-Lavalin affair, confining his comments to the internal chaos in the PMO while avoiding the real issues which are government efforts to mitigate the legal problems for a Quebec based construction firm accused of some and convicted of some criminal activities.

Claiming that saving jobs is the reason for supporting SNC Lavalin is not credible. This government sat on its hands while 12,000 Sears Canada employees were thrown out of work and over 50,000 oil and gas workers were thrown out of work.

Saving jobs is not a just cause for interfering in our criminal justice system. We have an independent Public Prosecution Service of Canada precisely to avoid political interference in criminal prosecutions.


The Public Prosecution Service of Canada (PPSC) is a national, independent and accountable prosecuting authority whose main objective is to prosecute federal offences and provides legal advice and assistance to law enforcement.  https://www.ppsc-sppc.gc.ca/eng/bas/index.html

The Director is Deputy Attorney General. The Attorney General has authority to review prosecutions and can override the PPSC, but if he or she does, must publish the decision for all to see.

That is precisely where the conflict lays.

The Prime Minister pointed out the terms of a deferred prosecution agreement allow it to be set up even in the last minutes of a trial.

The Attorney General has to decide whether or not allowing a deferred prosecution is in the public interest. It is not a political decision. Trudeau, through the PMO, was insisting the Attorney General should make a political decision, considering potential job losses and other political issues.

The real issue, which the Prime Minster refuses to address, is whether or not we want to allow political interference in the administration of justice.

My reaction is ‘no’ – a thousand times ‘no’! We do not want politicians deciding which criminal cases will be prosecuted in accordance with our laws and which cases will be given special treatment.

It is a very short step from granting special treatment for some corporations facing criminal charges to asking the PPSC to investigate corporations and individuals the government dislikes. Political interference in justice is a double-edged sword that can help or harm.

This government has failed to make a reasonable case for why we should accept a change to our criminal code that allows for deferred prosecution agreements. The change in the criminal code has not been properly scrutinized and all ramifications considered by the Commons and Senate.

The government made changes to the Criminal Code through an end run around the Commons Justice Committee and the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee by including the changes in a Finance Department Bill. That is unacceptable cloak and dagger behaviour the government must answer for.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more