Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: The real issue, which the Prime Minster refuses to address, is whether or not we want to allow political interference in the administration of justice



Globe and Mail ~~ March 7th, 2019

Prime Minster Justin Trudeau says he didn’t realize there was an “erosion of trust” between his office and former attorney-general Jody Wilson-Raybould over the fall of 2018 and acknowledged he should have realized this was taking place.

The Prime Minister used an early morning press conference to speak at length about the political crisis that has engulfed his government over the past month and triggered the resignation of one of his most senior aides and two cabinet ministers including Ms. Wilson-Raybould.

He offered no apologies for what has taken place, acknowledged no wrongdoing in what has unfolded since ...

CLICK HERE to read to full story:


Mr. Trudeau is skating on the edges of the SNC-Lavalin affair, confining his comments to the internal chaos in the PMO while avoiding the real issues which are government efforts to mitigate the legal problems for a Quebec based construction firm accused of some and convicted of some criminal activities.

Claiming that saving jobs is the reason for supporting SNC Lavalin is not credible. This government sat on its hands while 12,000 Sears Canada employees were thrown out of work and over 50,000 oil and gas workers were thrown out of work.

Saving jobs is not a just cause for interfering in our criminal justice system. We have an independent Public Prosecution Service of Canada precisely to avoid political interference in criminal prosecutions.


The Public Prosecution Service of Canada (PPSC) is a national, independent and accountable prosecuting authority whose main objective is to prosecute federal offences and provides legal advice and assistance to law enforcement.  https://www.ppsc-sppc.gc.ca/eng/bas/index.html

The Director is Deputy Attorney General. The Attorney General has authority to review prosecutions and can override the PPSC, but if he or she does, must publish the decision for all to see.

That is precisely where the conflict lays.

The Prime Minister pointed out the terms of a deferred prosecution agreement allow it to be set up even in the last minutes of a trial.

The Attorney General has to decide whether or not allowing a deferred prosecution is in the public interest. It is not a political decision. Trudeau, through the PMO, was insisting the Attorney General should make a political decision, considering potential job losses and other political issues.

The real issue, which the Prime Minster refuses to address, is whether or not we want to allow political interference in the administration of justice.

My reaction is ‘no’ – a thousand times ‘no’! We do not want politicians deciding which criminal cases will be prosecuted in accordance with our laws and which cases will be given special treatment.

It is a very short step from granting special treatment for some corporations facing criminal charges to asking the PPSC to investigate corporations and individuals the government dislikes. Political interference in justice is a double-edged sword that can help or harm.

This government has failed to make a reasonable case for why we should accept a change to our criminal code that allows for deferred prosecution agreements. The change in the criminal code has not been properly scrutinized and all ramifications considered by the Commons and Senate.

The government made changes to the Criminal Code through an end run around the Commons Justice Committee and the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee by including the changes in a Finance Department Bill. That is unacceptable cloak and dagger behaviour the government must answer for.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more