Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

SUITS AND BOOTS: The Senate indeed has the power to kill C69 … we are calling on them to again exercise their power of sober second thought


Senators call on Suits and Boots for Bill C-69 input ~~ March 28, 2019

Suits and Boots has been invited to appear before the Senate committee examining Bill C-69.   The organization’s founder, Rick Peterson, and Honorary Chair Brad Schell, a retired oil patch hauler from High River, Alberta will appear at the hearings being held by the Standing Senate committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources in Calgary on Tuesday, April 9.

This is an amazing honour,” said Peterson, an Edmonton businessman who launched the not-for-profit with six investment industry colleagues last April, “and we’re humbled that the Senators would like to hear the voices of our 3,700 members from coast to coast.”

This invitation is testimony to the hard work and persuasive abilities of every one of our supporters who phoned, emailed and wrote the Senate about this campaign since we launched it last September. And the fact that our lobbying on behalf of Andrew Roman to appear before the committee also paid off as well is doubly gratifying.”

Mr. Roman is a retired Toronto litigator whose views on the Bill C-69 legislation, formally known as the Impact Assessment act, align with and provide additional legal grounding for those same views shared by Suits and Boots members. The group started this campaign on January 17 to have him appear before the Senate committee. Earlier this week Mr. Roman received an invitation to testify on Tuesday, April 2 in Ottawa.

Peterson said that his group will be asking its members for personal anecdotes and perspectives about the importance of resource projects in their lives and how the delays and uncertainty caused by the current approvals process impacts them. This input will be collected, translated into both official languages, and presented to the Committee on April 9.

If it’s difficult now to get projects approved, as drafted Bill C-69 will make it effectively impossible,” Peterson said. “That will drive investment dollars out of Canada, stalling our economy and costing real Canadian jobs. On April 9, we will tell the personal stories of what that will mean for working Canadians.”

As drafted, Bill C-69 introduced numerous new requirements proposed projects would have to meet during their review, many of them unrelated to the project itself, and allows a Cabinet Minister to unilaterally cancel a project for political reasons even after years of expensive and time-consuming review. It is also poorly worded, opening up broad avenues for activists to launch delaying lawsuits opposing even the most responsible projects.

The Liberal government used its majority to quickly pass the bill through the House of Commons before last year’s summer break, sending it to the Senate for review before its implications could be understood.


The Senate indeed has the power to kill C-69,” said Peterson.

It’s used this power to kill or turn back more than 200 bills since Confederation, including bills the House sent to it in the past few decades on major issues like abortion, free trade, GST and greenhouse gas regulation. We are calling on them to again exercise their power of sober second thought.”



Suits and Boots was launched by six investment industry colleagues in April of 2018 with the mission of giving Canada’s resource sector workers a constructive voice in the decisions impacting their lives and livelihoods.

The organization has since grown to almost 3,700 members in more than 330 communities in every province and territory in Canada.

Suits and Boots has held rallies, confronted anti-Kinder Morgan protestors at Camp Cloud in Burnaby, launched its #KillBIllC69 campaign, flown banners over Parliament, produced a Kill the Bill C-69 song and will be testifying before the Senate Bill C69 Committee on April 9th in Calgary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more