Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN RUSTAD: I initially thought this was simply incompetence by the NDP. But did they do this intentionally to save their plans for a spring election call?


Will there be an election in BC this spring?  For those of us that are engaged
Reading of the 2019 BC government Throne Speech
in politics, this is a burning question. What could the signs be?

A throne speech normally sets the tone, and is used to lay out a vision for the next year, with hints at other initiatives. It is then defended by government MLAs.

The NDP introduced the lamest throne speech in BC’s history which simple attacked the BC Liberals, and praised the NDP initiatives from the previous year. It also contained a few populist issues and promises of programs not starting until future years.

The NDP also refused to speak to their throne speech, or defend it, leading to the shortest throne speech debate in BC history. I initially thought this was simply incompetence by the NDP. But did they do this intentionally to save their plans for a spring election call?

The NDP need to introduce legislation to support their promises made to the LNG industry. They have refused to reveal any deals they have made despite legislation requiring them to do so.

The Green Party has said they will vote against this legislation.

Are they holding off introducing this legislation to use as an excuse so that when the Greens vote against it, they can say their Confidence and Supply Agreement was been broken and therefore an election is required to resolve the impasse?

Normally government likes to roll out capital spending announcements at a pace designed to keep positive stories in the news. I have heard that many capital spending announcements have been held back. 

Is this designed to have a packed list of capital announcements just prior to a surprise election?


There are some serious economic storm clouds brewing over BC. Housing sales have dropped by about 40% year over year. And the government’s budget is predicting a further decline as well as a 25% drop in resource revenue.

Confidence in BC is shaky at best, and this will lead to significant budget problems for the NDP. Do they want to have an election before these challenges hit the people of BC?

The NDP are out doing significant advertising in Surrey, in ethnic media and in many swing riding's. Aren’t they the government of the whole province? They are intentionally targeting key riding's and swing riding's, and this is a very telling sign that they are looking for an election window. In the NDP advertising they are very focused on Premier John Horgan and rarely mention NDP. They know his popularity is better than their party’s.

AND FINALLY:

The attacks on the BC Liberals, and especially our leader, have notably increased. This type of action is almost always done just prior to an election.

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, there’s a good chance it’s a duck. The NDP are looking for an election window. Will they find it this spring?

Nechako Lakes riding MLA John Rustad


Prior to his election as the MLA for Nechako Lakes, John Rustad worked in the forest industry in logging and forest management. He started and operated Western Geographic Information Systems Inc. from 1995 to 2002 where he was engaged in forestry consulting. 

John was first elected to the BC Legislature in 2005 and was re-elected in 2009, 2013 and 2017. He served in various capacities including parliamentary secretary for Silviculture, parliamentary secretary for Forests, Minister of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation and Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations. 

He is currently the critic for the Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more