Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN RUSTAD: I initially thought this was simply incompetence by the NDP. But did they do this intentionally to save their plans for a spring election call?


Will there be an election in BC this spring?  For those of us that are engaged
Reading of the 2019 BC government Throne Speech
in politics, this is a burning question. What could the signs be?

A throne speech normally sets the tone, and is used to lay out a vision for the next year, with hints at other initiatives. It is then defended by government MLAs.

The NDP introduced the lamest throne speech in BC’s history which simple attacked the BC Liberals, and praised the NDP initiatives from the previous year. It also contained a few populist issues and promises of programs not starting until future years.

The NDP also refused to speak to their throne speech, or defend it, leading to the shortest throne speech debate in BC history. I initially thought this was simply incompetence by the NDP. But did they do this intentionally to save their plans for a spring election call?

The NDP need to introduce legislation to support their promises made to the LNG industry. They have refused to reveal any deals they have made despite legislation requiring them to do so.

The Green Party has said they will vote against this legislation.

Are they holding off introducing this legislation to use as an excuse so that when the Greens vote against it, they can say their Confidence and Supply Agreement was been broken and therefore an election is required to resolve the impasse?

Normally government likes to roll out capital spending announcements at a pace designed to keep positive stories in the news. I have heard that many capital spending announcements have been held back. 

Is this designed to have a packed list of capital announcements just prior to a surprise election?


There are some serious economic storm clouds brewing over BC. Housing sales have dropped by about 40% year over year. And the government’s budget is predicting a further decline as well as a 25% drop in resource revenue.

Confidence in BC is shaky at best, and this will lead to significant budget problems for the NDP. Do they want to have an election before these challenges hit the people of BC?

The NDP are out doing significant advertising in Surrey, in ethnic media and in many swing riding's. Aren’t they the government of the whole province? They are intentionally targeting key riding's and swing riding's, and this is a very telling sign that they are looking for an election window. In the NDP advertising they are very focused on Premier John Horgan and rarely mention NDP. They know his popularity is better than their party’s.

AND FINALLY:

The attacks on the BC Liberals, and especially our leader, have notably increased. This type of action is almost always done just prior to an election.

If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, there’s a good chance it’s a duck. The NDP are looking for an election window. Will they find it this spring?

Nechako Lakes riding MLA John Rustad


Prior to his election as the MLA for Nechako Lakes, John Rustad worked in the forest industry in logging and forest management. He started and operated Western Geographic Information Systems Inc. from 1995 to 2002 where he was engaged in forestry consulting. 

John was first elected to the BC Legislature in 2005 and was re-elected in 2009, 2013 and 2017. He served in various capacities including parliamentary secretary for Silviculture, parliamentary secretary for Forests, Minister of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation and Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations. 

He is currently the critic for the Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more