Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN FELDSTED: Civil legal proceedings have many aspects, and one is for a court to offer mediation between parties if mediation is possible


Wilson-Raybould directive to Justice Department staff raises alarm ... instructed Justice Department lawyers not to aggressively fight claims brought by Indigenous groups against the federal government
By Brian Giesbrecht ~~ Frontier Centre for Public Policy ~~ March 20, 2019

Since former Justice minister and attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould’s dramatic testimony before a committee of the House of Commons, followed by the testimony of Gerald Butts and Michael Wernick, much attention has been paid to SNC-Lavalin and the questionable behaviour of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Mostly missed were the last words of Privy Council clerk Michael Wernick’s prepared opening statement to the same Justice committee.

... Wernick’s surprising disclosure raises immediate concern with respect to the recent Restoule treaties annuities case in Ontario. That case ended in a decision that will, if not upset on appeal, eventually cost taxpayers billions of dollars.

CLICK HERE top read the full story by Brian Giesbrecht


The directive raised concerns for who? It is alarming to who? 

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Cabinet
ministers meet with leaders of National
Indigenous Organizations in Ottawa -- 2016
Why would a government committed to indigenous reconciliation engage in “aggressively fighting claims brought by Indigenous groups against the federal government”?

Why would the Indigenous Affairs Department continue to treat Indigenous people as enemies or as people who should meekly accept its dictates?

Civil legal proceedings have many aspects, and one is for a court to offer mediation between parties if mediation is possible. There are many shades of grey between aggressive defense and capitulation. It is not an all or nothing process.


I fail to understand why appealing a lower court decision on sound points of law could be defined as ‘aggressive’?

Appeals are a necessary part of our legal system to ensure that we ‘get it right’; otherwise, we risk lower court decisions of dubious value setting precedents.   

The article raises many questions -- and answers none. It highlights the necessity of separating the justice process from political considerations and indicates that our government finds itself embroiled in a series of internal conflicts that are serving no one.

The concept of reconciliation between our government, and indigenous people, is a worthy goal. It appears we have made a commitment to reconciliation without a sound plan to achieve the goal. That is not acceptable or in the interests of taxpayers and Canadians.

The principle of equality before and under the law overrides the special interests of any group.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more