Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN FELDSTED: Civil legal proceedings have many aspects, and one is for a court to offer mediation between parties if mediation is possible


Wilson-Raybould directive to Justice Department staff raises alarm ... instructed Justice Department lawyers not to aggressively fight claims brought by Indigenous groups against the federal government
By Brian Giesbrecht ~~ Frontier Centre for Public Policy ~~ March 20, 2019

Since former Justice minister and attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould’s dramatic testimony before a committee of the House of Commons, followed by the testimony of Gerald Butts and Michael Wernick, much attention has been paid to SNC-Lavalin and the questionable behaviour of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Mostly missed were the last words of Privy Council clerk Michael Wernick’s prepared opening statement to the same Justice committee.

... Wernick’s surprising disclosure raises immediate concern with respect to the recent Restoule treaties annuities case in Ontario. That case ended in a decision that will, if not upset on appeal, eventually cost taxpayers billions of dollars.



The directive raised concerns for who? It is alarming to who? 

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Cabinet
ministers meet with leaders of National
Indigenous Organizations in Ottawa -- 2016
Why would a government committed to indigenous reconciliation engage in “aggressively fighting claims brought by Indigenous groups against the federal government”?

Why would the Indigenous Affairs Department continue to treat Indigenous people as enemies or as people who should meekly accept its dictates?

Civil legal proceedings have many aspects, and one is for a court to offer mediation between parties if mediation is possible. There are many shades of grey between aggressive defense and capitulation. It is not an all or nothing process.


I fail to understand why appealing a lower court decision on sound points of law could be defined as ‘aggressive’?

Appeals are a necessary part of our legal system to ensure that we ‘get it right’; otherwise, we risk lower court decisions of dubious value setting precedents.   

The article raises many questions -- and answers none. It highlights the necessity of separating the justice process from political considerations and indicates that our government finds itself embroiled in a series of internal conflicts that are serving no one.

The concept of reconciliation between our government, and indigenous people, is a worthy goal. It appears we have made a commitment to reconciliation without a sound plan to achieve the goal. That is not acceptable or in the interests of taxpayers and Canadians.

The principle of equality before and under the law overrides the special interests of any group.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: You Have To Be A Bit Crazy

  Ward and his wife Carleen celebrating his win on election night.   In March of this year, I took on the role of Campaign Manager for BC Conservative candidate Ward Stamer.  It’s the third time I’ve had the opportunity as I took on the role for Peter Sharp in 2013, and for Dennis Giesbrecht in 2020. Now let me tell you, in the past, a BC Conservative campaign team generally consisted of myself, the candidate and one or two helpers – and very little in the way of a campaign budget. Thankfully, a benefit of having spent 30+ years in the broadcast media afforded me the ability to do ad copy and write candidate speeches, and prep both Dennis and Peter to deal with the media – it’s also something I have always enjoyed. That was part of my duties this time around as well, however having a team of a dozen and a half volunteers meant that for the first time we had people available to ID our supporters, put together and install campaign signs, distribute campaign literature, and help out at ou

Rustad will support policy for 'everyday' people, otherwise work to bring down NDP

  Conservative Party of B.C. John Rustad Tuesday (Oct. 29) said his party would support government policies that support "average, everyday working" persons in B.C., but also repeated earlier promises to bring down the B.C. NDP government under Premier David Eby. "If there are things that are moved forward that will improve lives for those people, we would be looking at support it," Rustad said. "But if he's going to carry forward with the destructive policies that he has, then yes, we are going to look at every opportunity possible to bring him down as soon as possible."  CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more