Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: The back-room dealings, controversy, rumours scandal, and secrecy are an object lesson in why governments should not be involved with or support business enterprises of any kind


Defence lawyers receive heavily censored memo to Trudeau about Mark Norman's case.
Murray Brewster ~~ CBC News ~~ Mar 28, 2019

A 60-page memo about Vice-Admiral Mark Norman's breach of trust case — written by the country's top federal bureaucrat to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau — has been delivered to Norman's lawyers with its contents almost completely blacked out.

Norman's defence team isn't happy with the redaction and plans to fight it in court.

The Department of Justice claims the document is subject to solicitor-client privilege and cannot be completely disclosed.

Marie Henein, Norman's lead counsel, has alleged political interference in the prosecution of the former head of the navy. Norman is accused of leaking cabinet secrets related to a $668 million shipbuilding deal

CLICK HERE to read the full story:


What the heck is going on?

Media reports last week alleged that Jody Wilson-Raybould had written a 60-page memo to Trudeau about appointment of Manitoba Judge Joyal to the Supreme Court. Now we discover a 60-page memo from Wernick to Trudeau on the Admiral Normand case.

It is unlikely that there are two separate 60 page documents we don’t know about, blanked out or not. It is too much of a coincidence to be credible. The PMO rumour mill is tripping over itself.


Claiming privilege, and the right to secrecy, is not appropriate in a criminal proceeding. Wernick is not separate from the PMO despite efforts to make it appear so. Wernick is also Secretary to the Cabinet which makes him part of the PMO, not apart from it.

There is a major battle on between Norman’s defence lawyers and the government:

In the background, Scott Brison, who was president of the Treasury Board during the alleged Norman misdeed resigned, and within a couple of weeks landed up with the Bank of Montreal. It turns out that the BMO has a significant stake in the Trans-Mountain purchase.

More on that later. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/briefing/article-bmo-warns-of-vicious-fallout-if-trans-mountain-pipeline-project-dies/

Then we have this: Morneau unveils principles for Indigenous ownership in Trans Mountain pipeline.

What is that all about?

We need to get Trans Mountain Pipeline back in private ownership, but I don’t see financing the purchase and expansion through indigenous bands. Building maintaining, and operating pipelines is a highly specialized field. We need to rebuild investor confidence in oil patch development and adding an indigenous factor will not be helpful. This looks more line a vote-buying ploy than a sound business plan.

All of the back-room dealings, controversy, rumours, scandal and secrecy are an object lesson in why governments should not be involved with or support business enterprises of any kind.

Governments need to develop a level playing field for all investors and business people -- and allow fair competition and market forces to work to our advantage. 

Entrepreneurs don’t gamble in Vegas and flee any nation where they suspect the dice are loaded in favour of local corporations or government favourites. We are getting some insight into just how bad it can get.

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more