Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Members of the public feel they have been given 50 random pieces from a 500-piece jig saw puzzle, and are trying to fit the pieces together to connect the bits that form the whole picture


Trudeau’s damage-control plan is aimed at Liberal MPs
Susan Delacourt ~~ National Columnist / Toronto Star ~~ March 18, 2019

Conservatives and New Democrats were less than impressed when Justin Trudeau rolled out three big steps on Monday to address the damage of the SNC-Lavalin affair ... but the opposition wasn’t the intended target of the measures ... disaffected Liberals — and former minister Jody Wilson-Raybould in particular — are clearly the top-of-mind concern for the prime minister in this new repair effort he’s launched.

So the test of Trudeau’s fix-it measures isn’t whether they placate the critics, but whether they help bring Liberals back to the fold in the days ahead. That in fact may be a theme of the week — or even this entire election year. Take Monday’s damage-control measures one at a time.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL STORY:


Disappointing, but expected. This government will not tolerate criticism or admit that it may not always be acting in the best interests of all Canadians.

Elitism and cronyism, spiced liberally with tyranny, have disaffected some liberal stalwarts and supporters who, realize there are practical limits to how far a Prime Minister can govern by decree.

Members of the public feel they have been given 50 random pieces from a 500-piece jig saw puzzle, and are trying to fit the pieces together to connect the bits that form the whole picture.

Misdirection and secrecy have added to the intrigue.

Little by little details are emerging of shadowy people who are interconnected by marriage, business interests and governance. What is most hurtful in all of this is that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and his inner circle, are oblivious to the need to appeal to electors and the public. Apparently, we don’t count ... only fixing the liberal machine is important.


Andrew Scheer and the Conservative Party are climbing in the polls, not because they are offering to fix obvious flaws in our system of governance, but because the government is caught in a scandal and flailing about aimlessly. That is disheartening.

No one will admit that the Privy Council has to be removed from the Prime Ministers Office (PMO) and restored to reporting to the Governor General. Privy Council history dates back to 1540, and has always reported to and supported the Queen or her surrogate which is the Governor General in Canada.

The Privy Council is politically neutral, and its documents and meetings are completely confidential. For that reason, it is also a neutral meeting ground for the government and opposition in times of emergency. The government can brief opposition leaders without the fear of a leak of information.

Cabinet discussions and meetings have a lower level of confidentiality in most jurisdictions. Using the Normand case, the defense could request a judicial review of documents the government does not want to reveal, and a judge would decide which documents should be revealed in the public interest. Our governments do not allow for judicial review of documents they consider confidential.
 
Prime Minister Mackenzie King took over the Privy Council and made the Clerk of the Privy Council also the Secretary to the Cabinet in March 1940 while Canada was at war. He was partly motivated by the King-Byng affair (1926), where the Governor General at the time refused King’s request to dissolve parliament and call an election. His aim was to reduce the powers of the Governor General.

More on this later.

The shift of the Privy Council to the PMO gives the Prime Minister executive powers he or she should not have under our constitution.

That has to be rectified to ensure stable governance, and a limit to the power of a PMO, particularly under a majority government. A majority of seats in the commons does not entitle the Prime Minister to rule rather than represent.  

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more