Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Members of the public feel they have been given 50 random pieces from a 500-piece jig saw puzzle, and are trying to fit the pieces together to connect the bits that form the whole picture


Trudeau’s damage-control plan is aimed at Liberal MPs
Susan Delacourt ~~ National Columnist / Toronto Star ~~ March 18, 2019

Conservatives and New Democrats were less than impressed when Justin Trudeau rolled out three big steps on Monday to address the damage of the SNC-Lavalin affair ... but the opposition wasn’t the intended target of the measures ... disaffected Liberals — and former minister Jody Wilson-Raybould in particular — are clearly the top-of-mind concern for the prime minister in this new repair effort he’s launched.

So the test of Trudeau’s fix-it measures isn’t whether they placate the critics, but whether they help bring Liberals back to the fold in the days ahead. That in fact may be a theme of the week — or even this entire election year. Take Monday’s damage-control measures one at a time.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL STORY:


Disappointing, but expected. This government will not tolerate criticism or admit that it may not always be acting in the best interests of all Canadians.

Elitism and cronyism, spiced liberally with tyranny, have disaffected some liberal stalwarts and supporters who, realize there are practical limits to how far a Prime Minister can govern by decree.

Members of the public feel they have been given 50 random pieces from a 500-piece jig saw puzzle, and are trying to fit the pieces together to connect the bits that form the whole picture.

Misdirection and secrecy have added to the intrigue.

Little by little details are emerging of shadowy people who are interconnected by marriage, business interests and governance. What is most hurtful in all of this is that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and his inner circle, are oblivious to the need to appeal to electors and the public. Apparently, we don’t count ... only fixing the liberal machine is important.


Andrew Scheer and the Conservative Party are climbing in the polls, not because they are offering to fix obvious flaws in our system of governance, but because the government is caught in a scandal and flailing about aimlessly. That is disheartening.

No one will admit that the Privy Council has to be removed from the Prime Ministers Office (PMO) and restored to reporting to the Governor General. Privy Council history dates back to 1540, and has always reported to and supported the Queen or her surrogate which is the Governor General in Canada.

The Privy Council is politically neutral, and its documents and meetings are completely confidential. For that reason, it is also a neutral meeting ground for the government and opposition in times of emergency. The government can brief opposition leaders without the fear of a leak of information.

Cabinet discussions and meetings have a lower level of confidentiality in most jurisdictions. Using the Normand case, the defense could request a judicial review of documents the government does not want to reveal, and a judge would decide which documents should be revealed in the public interest. Our governments do not allow for judicial review of documents they consider confidential.
 
Prime Minister Mackenzie King took over the Privy Council and made the Clerk of the Privy Council also the Secretary to the Cabinet in March 1940 while Canada was at war. He was partly motivated by the King-Byng affair (1926), where the Governor General at the time refused King’s request to dissolve parliament and call an election. His aim was to reduce the powers of the Governor General.

More on this later.

The shift of the Privy Council to the PMO gives the Prime Minister executive powers he or she should not have under our constitution.

That has to be rectified to ensure stable governance, and a limit to the power of a PMO, particularly under a majority government. A majority of seats in the commons does not entitle the Prime Minister to rule rather than represent.  

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more