Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

DOUG CLOVECHOK: I support the preservation of quality farm and ranchland. But we should not have a minority government stripping the rights of private landowners no matter what the circumstances


There has been a ton of conversation on my Facebook page about the ALR (Agriculture Land Reserve), it is great to see this. It is an important topic, I'm glad there are many voicing their thoughts on the legislative changes the BC NDP government have moved forward.

If I may, I'd like to give another 2 cents to this topic...thanks to Stu S. for asking for more of my thoughts

I believe we do need to ensure we have enough quality farmland in Canada to grow the food needed for our population. As a matter of fact, I believe it needs to be a priority. However, ensuring we have enough food farmland should not require our minority government to confiscate the rights of private property owners.

Where specific land within the ALR is agriculturally marginal, it surely makes sense to allow those private property owners to use their land in other productive ways.

My problem with what the BC NDP is doing is twofold:

  1. they treat all land within the ALR as if it is all good quality farmland and it demonstrably is not; 
  2. they disrespect the rights of ordinary people who chose to live in the country and live on land that has no agricultural potential or value.

Bill’s 52 and 15 create a scenario whereby all things around agricultural land use are the same. A one fits all approach just doesn't make sense. We need to have policy that recognizes the land diversity in this province so that viable agricultural lands are protected and those that are not are given alternatives in terms of use.

If a rancher wants to build a house on his land for his children to live in, so that they can work the ranch and eventually take it over (and keep it in the family), should he have the right to ask the government if he is allowed to do so?


Bills 52 and 15 will take away his right to ask, and any possibility of preserving the long-term functionality of the ranch.

Also, if these new rules will not hold up in a court of law, they will result in high litigation costs. There is no point making rules that will not stand up when challenged in a court of law, regardless of the issue at hand.

The word “ALR” evokes different connotations depending on which community you live in. In Revelstoke, it might be closely aligned with development. In the Columbia Valley, it’s about generations of farmers and ranchers. Our riding of Columbia River-Revelstoke is fantastically diverse.

The ALR should not all be painted with the same brush—a one-size-fits-all approach is not effective in addressing each area’s unique circumstances.

I support the preservation of quality farm and ranch land. But we should not have a minority government stripping the rights of private landowners no matter what the circumstances. We need policy that recognizes the land diversity in this province so that viable agricultural lands are protected, but not at the cost of confiscating the rights of any private landowner.

I'm not always able to respond to my Facebook comments, but I must say the individuals who are participating in civil, respectful conversation (on my fb page) make me smile.

Isn't this what it's all about? Conversing with neighbours, sharing ideas, and maybe learning something. You guys are great!


 
That’s me on the old trusty horse. I cowboy
for my ranching neighbour whenever I can.

WHO IS DOUG CLOVECHOK:

Doug was elected as MLA for Columbia River-Revelstoke in 2017.  Once elected, Doug was positioned as the Official Opposition's co-critic on Tourism, Arts, and Culture and sits on the Select Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs as well as the Special Committee to Appoint a Chief Electoral Officer.

Prior to his election, Doug enjoyed an extensive career in education.  For 20 years, Doug combined interests in business and education as CEO of the Calgary Education Partnership Foundation. His work has been recognized by the Conference Board of Canada and the Calgary Chamber of Commerce.

Doug has also worked extensively in tourism, managing operations for Princess Tours in the Calgary area for nearly twenty years.  Doug holds a Master's Degree in Educational Leadership and Administration from Gonzaga University Graduate School of Business and a Bachelor's Degree in Secondary Education and Teaching from the University of Calgary.

Doug is an adopted member of the Weasletraveller family and an honourary chief of the Piikani First Nation of the Blackfoot Confederacy. He and his wife Susan live at Dutch Creek.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more