Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

DOUG CLOVECHOK: I support the preservation of quality farm and ranchland. But we should not have a minority government stripping the rights of private landowners no matter what the circumstances


There has been a ton of conversation on my Facebook page about the ALR (Agriculture Land Reserve), it is great to see this. It is an important topic, I'm glad there are many voicing their thoughts on the legislative changes the BC NDP government have moved forward.

If I may, I'd like to give another 2 cents to this topic...thanks to Stu S. for asking for more of my thoughts

I believe we do need to ensure we have enough quality farmland in Canada to grow the food needed for our population. As a matter of fact, I believe it needs to be a priority. However, ensuring we have enough food farmland should not require our minority government to confiscate the rights of private property owners.

Where specific land within the ALR is agriculturally marginal, it surely makes sense to allow those private property owners to use their land in other productive ways.

My problem with what the BC NDP is doing is twofold:

  1. they treat all land within the ALR as if it is all good quality farmland and it demonstrably is not; 
  2. they disrespect the rights of ordinary people who chose to live in the country and live on land that has no agricultural potential or value.

Bill’s 52 and 15 create a scenario whereby all things around agricultural land use are the same. A one fits all approach just doesn't make sense. We need to have policy that recognizes the land diversity in this province so that viable agricultural lands are protected and those that are not are given alternatives in terms of use.

If a rancher wants to build a house on his land for his children to live in, so that they can work the ranch and eventually take it over (and keep it in the family), should he have the right to ask the government if he is allowed to do so?


Bills 52 and 15 will take away his right to ask, and any possibility of preserving the long-term functionality of the ranch.

Also, if these new rules will not hold up in a court of law, they will result in high litigation costs. There is no point making rules that will not stand up when challenged in a court of law, regardless of the issue at hand.

The word “ALR” evokes different connotations depending on which community you live in. In Revelstoke, it might be closely aligned with development. In the Columbia Valley, it’s about generations of farmers and ranchers. Our riding of Columbia River-Revelstoke is fantastically diverse.

The ALR should not all be painted with the same brush—a one-size-fits-all approach is not effective in addressing each area’s unique circumstances.

I support the preservation of quality farm and ranch land. But we should not have a minority government stripping the rights of private landowners no matter what the circumstances. We need policy that recognizes the land diversity in this province so that viable agricultural lands are protected, but not at the cost of confiscating the rights of any private landowner.

I'm not always able to respond to my Facebook comments, but I must say the individuals who are participating in civil, respectful conversation (on my fb page) make me smile.

Isn't this what it's all about? Conversing with neighbours, sharing ideas, and maybe learning something. You guys are great!


 
That’s me on the old trusty horse. I cowboy
for my ranching neighbour whenever I can.

WHO IS DOUG CLOVECHOK:

Doug was elected as MLA for Columbia River-Revelstoke in 2017.  Once elected, Doug was positioned as the Official Opposition's co-critic on Tourism, Arts, and Culture and sits on the Select Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs as well as the Special Committee to Appoint a Chief Electoral Officer.

Prior to his election, Doug enjoyed an extensive career in education.  For 20 years, Doug combined interests in business and education as CEO of the Calgary Education Partnership Foundation. His work has been recognized by the Conference Board of Canada and the Calgary Chamber of Commerce.

Doug has also worked extensively in tourism, managing operations for Princess Tours in the Calgary area for nearly twenty years.  Doug holds a Master's Degree in Educational Leadership and Administration from Gonzaga University Graduate School of Business and a Bachelor's Degree in Secondary Education and Teaching from the University of Calgary.

Doug is an adopted member of the Weasletraveller family and an honourary chief of the Piikani First Nation of the Blackfoot Confederacy. He and his wife Susan live at Dutch Creek.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more