Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: This arrogant, condescending, dishonest piece of elitist ego is not an asset to the civil service, government or Canada


Michael Wernick to step down as clerk of Privy Council, cites lack of 'mutual trust' with opposition.  Wernick writes: 'The clerk (must) be seen by all political parties as an impartial arbiter'
Catharine Tunney ~~ CBC News ~~ Mar 18, 2019

In a letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announcing his retirement, Wernick wrote that "recent events have led me to conclude that I cannot serve as clerk of the Privy Council and secretary to cabinet during the upcoming election campaign."

CLICK HERE for the full story: 

This arrogant, condescending, dishonest piece of elitist ego is not an asset to the civil service, government or Canada.

Wernick is correct – the Clerk of the Privy council must be neutral, non-political and trusted by all parties and Members of Parliament – and report to the Governor General, not to the Prime Minister. Constitution Sections 9 and 11 are clear:


9. The Executive Government and Authority of and over Canada is hereby declared to continue and be vested in the Queen.

11. There shall be a Council to aid and advise in the Government of Canada, to be styled the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada; and the Persons who are to be Members of that Council shall be from Time to Time chosen and summoned by the Governor General and sworn in as Privy Councillors, and Members thereof may be from Time to Time removed by the Governor General.    

Wernick never uses his full title: Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to the Cabinet.

As Secretary to the Cabinet he cannot be non-political and cannot be trusted by opposition parties or Members of Parliament. He sits in the government’s inner circle and is part of the Prime Minister’s Office. Claims by the government, Wernick and the media that he is politically neutral, and non-partisan are preposterous. 

The executive power of the Governor General, acting for the Queen, were transferred to the Prime Minister by PM Mackenzie King in March 1940 by an Order in Council. 


The change was not approved by the Commons or the Senate and did not have Royal Assent ... it is not law. 


The Prime Minister does not have the constitutional authority to override the Queen. Mackenzie King invented the dual role of Clerk of the Privy Council and Secretary to the Cabinet. 

Prior to that they were separate roles.

We are suffering governments of dubious legality and subterfuge. We need to get this sorted out and reinstate the Privy Council as a separate entity from the Cabinet and Prime Minister, reporting to the Governor General. The Secretary to the Cabinet should be a separate position and is naturally partisan.

The Prime Minister’s Office should be restricted to a principle secretary and two clerks. The Prime Minister surrounding himself with a dozen highly paid advisors and strategists at public (taxpayer) cost is ridiculous. His advice and policy development should come from his cabinet and caucus, not from expensive hired help. That is not democratic governance.   


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 
Post a Comment
Read more

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more