Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN - If that is the precedent he is setting, then I guess nobody needs to be accountable for anything under his leadership


I tend to stay away from federal political stories in this blog. Mostly because there are so many provincial stories that it keeps me busy enough.

However, I’m a Canadian and a politician. So, I feel it’s impossible to let the latest chapter in the Prime Minister Justin Trudeau / SNC-Lavalin affair go without a comment.

Like many Canadians, I’ve been watching this affair unfold. I held my tongue as our Members of Parliament worked to expose the truth from one side of the issue and the others. Without being in Ottawa I decided it's best to let my federal colleagues do their work.

So why comment now ... what has changed?

The release of the Ethics Commissioner’s report and the Prime Minister's reluctance to be accountable or even apologize. The findings are deeply troubling and Prime Minister Trudeau’s response is what drove me to feel the need to plant a flag here.

Ethical leadership
While the Liberal Party of Canada is going to try to spin this situation into an election imperative: are Canadians really okay with a Conservative government? (Because they would like you to believe that would be the result of undermining Trudeau.) Or, as the Prime Minister stated himself, do we believe he was just doing his job of protecting Canadian jobs.

I’m sorry, but his job is to lead our country and to do it ethically. It is also his job to maintain the honour and integrity of our government.

As an elected official myself, I am vitally aware of the fact that my actions, and how I undertake my duties, is a reflection of the institution of our government.

If it is okay for the person holding the highest office in the land to “disagree” with the Ethics Commissioners ruling ... but accept “full responsibility” for a situation that cost him two highly competent and celebrated Cabinet Ministers ... if that is the precedent he is setting, then I guess nobody needs to be accountable for anything under his leadership.

If he is taking responsibility, then why is he not accountable?  Further, why is it that his former Justice Minister is the only one who is paying a price for an ethical breach that the Prime Minister is accepting responsibility for?

Wait it out?

As a Canadian it's appalling, and as an elected official it's deeply troubling. There was a time that Prime Ministers, Premiers and Cabinet Ministers were accountable for their actions, the actions of their staff and the activities that occurred under their supervision. In order to preserve the integrity of our government, to ensure people could still trust their politicians when scandals were uncovered, leaders publicly fell on their sword. 

The integrity of government was maintained because somebody in a position of power and authority paid a price, allowing the government to move on.

That principle appears to have gone extinct in Canada and now there is a new approach, hunker down and wait it out, apparently with the hope we will all forget it ever happened.

This is about accountability for unethical behaviour. If we can’t have that then what have we?

Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands.

Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more