Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

BC Hydro illegally adding GST to the Customer Crisis Fund (no matter how little the amount) – only makes it worse


The other day I called BC Hydro with regards to the Customer Crisis fund – you know, the one that the BC Utilities Commission approved BC Hydro charges us a fee to pay for the utility account of other customers who for whatever reasons are unable to pay their bill.

The reason I called though wasn’t my objection to the charge (although I did mention it) ... it was in fact because I became aware that we also pay GST on that charge.

Now, according to Turbo Tax, (https://turbotax.intuit.ca/tips/what-is-the-gsthst-credit-and-how-do-i-qualify-5500)

“The Goods and Services tax is a federal sales tax of 5 percent levied on most transactions in Canada, such as retail purchases, real estate sales, and personal services,” says Christopher Liddiard, certified financial planner with Investors Group in London, Ontario.

Seems pretty clear to me ... GST is charged on retail purchases, real estate sales, and personal services.

Is the Customer Crisis fund a retail purchase?  NO, it is not!
Is the Customer Crisis fund a real estate sale?  Definitely Not!
Is the Customer Crisis fund a personal service?  It certainly isn’t!

However, here is what I was informed by a BC Hydro Customer Service Supervisor whose name I will withhold for privacy:

When it comes to the GST portion from the Customer Crisis Fund charges, BC Hydro is following the Direction of the Excise Tax Act.  It requires us to charge 5% tax on all rate ‘categories’ (Under sub-section 165 (1)).  As the Customer Crisis Fund Rate Rider (1903) is one of these charges it is also subject to GST.

In actual fact, here is the quoted section of the Excise Tax Act, subsection 165 (1) https://www.fin.gc.ca/drleg-apl/ITABud06_1-eng.asp -- it specifically states:

Existing subsection 165(1) imposes tax on recipients of taxable supplies made in Canada at the rate of 7 per cent on the value of the consideration for the supply. (note, this tax is now actually 5%)

The fact of the matter is, nothing has been provided by BC Hydro under this mandatory charge.  It has been imposed upon us – it is NOT a Rate Category; it is instead a charge on a fee – and NO service is being provided.

Regardless of the amount of the tax (BC Hydro stated to me it is only 15 cents per year), the Excise Tax Act obviously and clearly DOES NOT give permission to charge GST on the Crisis Fund -- there is NO supply / supplies being provided.

Instead the Customer Crisis Fund is a source of revenue taken from 1.8 million residential customers, in order for Hydro to have someone else pay for delinquent accounts.


My current BC Hydro bill specifically indicates, TAXES ON ELECTRICITY USAGE ... GST 5% -- and even Hydro says the GST is being charged on Electricity usage.  If you care to take a look at your hydro bill, that includes the Basic Charge, Step 1 and Step 2 Energy Charges, and then without considering the mistake(?) they are making, they also charge (GST) on the Crisis Fund.

It is offensive to me that BC Hydro was ever given permission to tack this Crisis Fund charge on my bill in the first place – illegally adding GST to it (no matter how little the amount) – only makes it worse.

Finally -- I can only image the hundred fold costs that must be involved in calculating that additional tax on our Hydro bill. Get rid of the tax ... and better yet, get rid of thet fund. 

NO other business is allowed to charge me money to pay someone else’s bill, so why should an agency of the government?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more