This is how democracy should work; a good idea is put on the floor, it’s considered, it’s debated, it’s voted on, and it improves legislation
This past Saturday Green
Party MLA Adam Olsen was in Kamloops speaking to members at a dinner Bar-B-Que,
and I also took the opportunity to attend.
In his talk to members he spoke of the salmon industry ... forestry ...
building infrastructure ... living infrastructure ... and more.
With regards to the
salmon industry Olsen stated that continually the numbers expected to head to
interior spawning grounds are, more times than not, far lower than expected.
Tongue in cheek he
stated, “Thirteen percent? Forget
about them ... just leave them. You know
what? Just let them go because it’s not
worth it”.
The problem with that is
that he said, is if we say that about salmon, we are in essence saying the same
thing about ourselves. He then continued ....
We are saying that if
we are okay to let this species, this iconic cornerstone species that holds
together – that literally is a connective tissue in almost everything in this
province – then what we are saying it’s okay for us. It’s okay for ourselves
... to be treated in exactly the same way.
I’ve been repeating
over and over again ...
Good salmon policy
Good environmental
Good social
And good economic
policy.
I repeat it everywhere I
go!
Good salmon policy
Good salmon policy
Good environmental
Good social
And good economic
policy.
If you do good salmon
policy well you are inadvertently doing everything else well. You’re looking
after the exco-systems, you’re looking after the people, and you’re also
looking after the economy.
If that’s true, then
the exact opposite is true! Bad salmon
policy is bad environmental, bad social, and bad economic policy.
And so, what ends up
happening, is you’ve got this situation where we’ve mismanaged these incredibly
important species ... species that have fed all parts of this province ...
whether it be human beings or nature.
And now we’ve got a rockslide
that occurred last month on the Fraser River, causing difficulty for salmon to
get upstream to spawn. This isn’t the
first landslide that has occurred on a river; many landslides have happened on rivers. And because there have been resilient salmon
runs year, after year, after year, the whole cycle for salmon has
survived.
Unfortunately, with
each one of these instances, we are creating situations where the entire system
becomes so fragile that now they’re looking at a really devastating state.
We
can no longer operate in this political sphere.
The federal,
provincial, and local governments must move away, in my opinion, from the
politicking that’s happened. The
pendulum swings from left to right ... good and evil ... from us and them, good
and bad --- however you want to look at it.
They must get away from that political narrative and to governing.
And there’s a
difference ... a really important difference ... between politicking and governing.
Governing is about
making decisions about good salmon policy, and it’s saying to those people who
are all fighting right now over who gets to gut the last fish – it’s saying to
them, “We are
going to make a decision and there’s going to be some pain involved ... and you
might not like it”.
Politics is to say to
those special interest groups, “What do you want us to do about it? How
do you want us to deal with it?”
And of course, the
commercial fishery will say stop all sport fishing ... and sport fishers will
say stop all commercial fishing ... and the First Nations are going to say stop
all fishing all together until we get our food fish and ceremonial fish.
But the reality is
that we are in a situation where I don’t know that we can afford to take any
more fish – and that’s not a very popular position to take on all accounts –
but that’s governing.
That’s where a
government goes, “Look, you know what?
We’ve done a really bad job on this ... a really really bad job on this”
The reality is your
Thompson River Steelhead that come up into this area – the Thompson River
steelhead - are the victims of just this kind of decision making.
The body that makes
the decision if a species should be on the endangered list or not (COSEWIC) said,
“No you should definitely
have this fish on it. You should list this fish”
I mean you could name
each individual fish, that’s how few there are, that’s how sad the situation
is. A hundred and fifty ... fifty ...
eighty-five. We could go through the list and name each one.
I ask questions about
this in Question Period and the province says it’s federal ... the federal
government says well it’s provincial government that regulates the
recommendations on the Chum fishery, which they call a sustainable fishery;
they’ve given it that designation.
The Chum fishery might
be sustainable but the bycatch, what they’re killing, is the few remaining
Thompson River Steelhead. So, they get caught in this situation – clearly the
difference between politics and governing.
Politics
stops us from making the governing decisions that we actually need to make --
to be responsible.
For us as
politicians, to look after the public interest, we have to be prepared to make
the decisions that are tough and that the public may not like. The reality of it is, that when you get down
to fifty something, or eighty something, or a hundred and something steelhead, you’re
dealing with populations that are very much on the brink of extinction from the
planet forever ... and that’s just not acceptable.
And forestry, is
another one of those foundational industries like fishing, in our province.
And it doesn’t matter
where I go in this province, it doesn’t matter who I talk to in this province,
they tell me the same thing about our forestry practices as the fisher people
are telling me about DFO’s fishery management.
It’s 100 percent bad.
There isn’t anyone who’s saying yah we’re doing okay – that is until you get to
government.
And they’re like
ahhhhh .... “Don’t worry about it, it’s great.
Never before have we managed forests as well as we’re doing right
now. In fact, we haven’t had more
forests than we have right now.”
The numbers that they
use to talk about old growth on Vancouver Island --- you absolutely have to
stretch your imagination --- you have to include tiny little high alpine trees
that are never going to be cut – they’re hanging off a cliff and they’re 250
years old and they’re this big (stretching his hands approximately a foot apart),
and they’re way up on the top of a mountain – that’s an old growth tree.
And they’re including
that into the count in order to boost up the numbers.
So, we are in a
situation where politics has taken over and we are liquidating our forests.
I stand up in
Question Period and I say to the Minister, ‘We are liquidating our forests’,
and he says to me ‘We’re not liquidating our forests’.
They don’t like that
term, but I can’t think of a better way to describe what’s happening. It’s
absolutely devastating -- you cannot describe that as sustainable forestry.
And now we’ve got a
situation where mills are closing ... and we’re trying to wrap our head around
exactly what’s going on and how to make sense of it. How to transition where we’re at right now --
which is basically just taking it all -- at a time when we’re looking at
climate change, and this crisis at a global level.
The
only way I can describe it is insanity, and the result of politics overtaking
our governments.
It is a result of the
policy lurches, and pendulum swings we’ve had in this province, and to a great
extent we’ve had in this country that absolutely must be stopped.
At this point Adam spent
a bit of time talking about the years leading up to the election ... being able
to follow bills through their inception to the end passage ... and touring the
province as the Interim leader to find out about the various areas and issues.
He spoke about having had
a chance to learn, and so that when elected and in a minority government situation,
he didn’t feel completely like a fish out of water ... just a little bit. And then he went on to talk about being part
of the opposition, but working with the BC NDP through the Supply and
Confidence agreement. Then he got back
to what really spoke to me ... governance and politics.
He mentioned this was
something he’s been talking about this because it’s been on his mind a lot
lately, and something he’s been writing about as well on his
blog.
Said Olsen, I’ve been
playing with this notion, trying to figure it out and unpack it, and how we can
actually change it, to get us away from this.
One of the ways were two
private members bills which, as far as they could tell, were the first private
members bills passed in the province.
One was on the Business Corporation Amendment Act ... and second was an
act that allowed people who are victims of sexualized violence to break
their fixed term leases if they were in that unfortunate situation.
So, these are not the two first good ideas that have come up by a private member, but this is the first time in the history of our province that the government has agreed to debate these bills, and then to pass them. They passed unanimously.
So, these are not the two first good ideas that have come up by a private member, but this is the first time in the history of our province that the government has agreed to debate these bills, and then to pass them. They passed unanimously.
We are moving to a
government that is focused more on governance.
We still have a long way to go, but this is the path that I hope we are
moving on, and towards.
This
is how democracy should work – this is how a proper functioning legislature
works. A good idea is put on the floor,
it’s considered, it’s debated, it’s voted on, and it improves legislation, and that’s what the BC Greens have
been able to bring to the BC Legislature on a day to day basis in the
functioning of your democratic institution.
Those are wins for
the people of British Columbia – wins for you – and that’s the reason why I
think we need to have a diversity of voices in the legislature.
Olsen spoke about
meeting with First Nations people that afternoon, about how that had looked,
and then he went on to say that they are coming to him and the Greens because
... we provide another doorway into government. Because they know that if I start Tweeting
about this, that I’m an annoyance to the government.
And If I do it with a
smile on my face that I’m really a major annoyance.
And so, this is why
having more voices, less consolidation of power, more fragmentation of power
from across all 87 MLA’s is a good thing.
We all get there.
Todd Stone, Peter Milobar, and I all got there exactly the same way as each
other. We were able to get a certain
number of votes, enough votes for us to take that seat. Those voices, their voices, and my voice
should not be any less, or any more, important than all of the other 84 MLA’s
that got there in exactly the same way as we got there.
As
so we need to honour that – and when we honour that, we honour you – we honour
the voters of this province - and we honour the ‘people’ of this province.
And by honouring the
people of this province, then we begin to honour the eco-systems, and nature,
and all of those other things that help provide a healthy place for all of us
to live. And right now, we are doing a
poor job of honouring that whole spectrum of things that we need to be
honouring.
And so, what I hope
you are able to take away is that we as a caucus operate on a different kind of
vibration than our colleagues do .... and we’re trying to take the system that
has been evolving into a ‘service centre of politicians and political power
mongering’, and turn it back out and say ... ‘This is actually an institution
that should be operating to serve you, and us, collectively’.
And that’s the work
that we’re hoping to do, so that when we’re looking at water ... when we’re
looking at trees ... when we’re looking at mines ... and fish ... and child and
family services ... and policing ... and municipal affairs and infrastructure
renewal; when we’re look at all of those things, we’re looking at them not from
the lens of how does this funding serve me and my political career, but rather
... ‘How does this serve the people that we’re elected to represent, the
communities, the province’.
And knowing that in
the end, if we do that job well, then the political part of it takes care of
itself.
At that point, Adam took
things to a Q and A where he spoke of a number of things including rural
forestry communities that have been hit with closures and lay-offs ... building
infrastructures projects ... and what he called living infrastructure
projects (giving credit to Skeetchestn
Band Chief Ron Ignace for that definition) which would be remediation of
the land, the fish of the oceans and rivers, and from logging, mining and other
resource development ... and how perhaps many of those transitioning from
forestry could be part of that.
It was a good evening
... and an inspiring conversation from Green Party MLA Adam Olsen, which I was
delighted to hear.
Comments
Post a Comment