Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Our federation is built on the constitutional principle that the provinces have the better understanding of local circumstances to make policies that are best suited to the needs of their citizens


While the New Democratic government of BC continues to jack up the carbon taxes British Columbians pay, next door the government of Alberta is opposed to any interference by the federal government in what it, and several others provinces infer, is incursion into provincial maters.

On Friday, Doug Schweitzer, Minister of Justice and Solicitor General, issued the following statement on Alberta’s reference to the Alberta Court of Appeal:

The Government of Alberta will be filing our factum at the Alberta Court of Appeal to challenge the constitutionality of the imposition of a federal carbon tax on Albertans and defend Alberta’s constitutional right to make policy best suited to the needs of our province. This factum provides our full legal argument and full fact scenario so our Court of Appeal can hear and make a decision based on the unique evidence we present

With this action, we are not only fulfilling our commitment to create jobs, growth and economic diversification, but we are also arguing that Ottawa’s unilateral imposition of a carbon tax on Albertans constitutes unprecedented federal interference with our constitutional authority to manage affairs within our own jurisdiction.

In BC, many have argued that the carbon tax first imposed by the Liberal government of the day, was little more than another way to increase revenues for the government.,  While it was initially ‘revenue neutral' (many would argue otherwise) the Carbon Tax is now without doubt generating a cash surplus (above and beyond its’ alleged neutrality, to simply push forward its’ agenda of ever increasing government interference in our lives from cradle to grave.

Allowing this unprecedented overreach would effectively amend the constitution to expand the power of the federal government to allow it to further interfere in provincial affairs and dictate our policy decisions. Provincial authority and the practical ability to regulate the entities and activities that produce greenhouse gases are undisputed as a matter of constitutional law. The factum we are filing includes our government’s comprehensive plan to regulate industrial emitters, as well as the fact that Alberta has been a proud leader for over a decade in the regulation of greenhouse gases, which was always seen to be clearly listed as a provincial responsibility under the constitution.  


The April 2019 carbon tax rate in British Columbia increased from $35 per tonne, to $40 per tonne.  Translated by the type of fuel used, the carbon tax works out to:
Gasoline ... 8.89 centers / lire
Diesel (light fuel oil) ... 10.23 cents / litre
Natural Gas ... 7.60 cents per litre

Our federation is built on the constitutional principle that the provinces have the better understanding of local circumstances to make policies that are best suited to the needs of their citizens.  This week, I met with the ministers of justice and legal teams of like-minded provinces fighting this unprecedented federal overreach. Each of the provinces are unique with different economies, different demographics and different geographies, among other unique attributes. That is why our constitution was structured to give provinces the right to tailor our own programs at the provincial level to deal with greenhouse gas emissions instead of Ottawa’s imposition of a one-size-fits-all carbon tax that is all economic pain with no environmental gain.

Quebec has also recognized this unwanted federal intrusion and is intervening in Saskatchewan’s appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.  Even though the federal government has endorsed their regulatory regime, Quebec is notably arguing that it is a province’s own right to make such decisions according to local circumstances.  Provinces are perfectly capable of finding local solutions to address climate change without the heavy-handed intrusion of Ottawa. We are proud to work with our coalition of allies on this point that includes the majority of provinces representing the vast majority of Canadians against this overreach by the federal government

BC’s Carbon tax WILL BE increased a further $5 / tonne next year, and then again by another $5 in 20201 – taking it to $50 / tonne.  It should be noted that this is a five-fold increase from the initial $10 it started at, just a decade ago

Our constitution is not based on 'Ottawa knows best'. It is based on the principle that the provinces are best situated to make policy decisions for their own citizens

Our government has been clear: we will use every legal tool at our disposal to fight the federal carbon tax and stand up for the rights of Albertans. We will never be apologetic when defending our province’s interests.  We will never relent in promoting jobs. And we will never be passive when championing our economy.

Alberta has a strong and proud history of advancing our province’s rights and I am proud that our government will continue that legacy by defending our interests in court.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more