Employer Community – this is an unacceptable business practice, and definitely not a ‘worker-centred’ approach with respect to dealing with inquiries injured workers
Just one of a number of business
and industry associations in BC, the Vancouver Regional Construction
Association (VRCA) signed on to an employer community submission to the
Workers’ Compensation System (WorkSafeBC) Review, a number of weeks back. At
the time, the submission was endorsed by 46 sectoral and cross-sectoral
business organizations representing small, medium and large businesses in
virtually all aspects of the B.C. economy.
“Balanced WorkSafeBC policies and practices
support healthy, safe and productive workplaces for all,” said Fiona
Famulak, VRCA president. "A review of a system such as WorkSafeBC,
which is integral to the operations of every business in the province, needs to
be clearly defined and given sufficient time for industry and public
consultation."
A July
19th letter to Ms. Janet
Patterson, Reviewer
for the Workers’ Compensation System Review, Famulak indicated
however that ... we are concerned that the compressed timeline set
for the Review may compromise the
ability to have proper examination
and full and meaningful consultation
with industry stakeholders
such as ourselves.
Additionally, the Employer
Community Submission to the Workers’ Compensation System Review, prepared
for Janet Paterson, stated:
... the Reviewer did not provide any insight regarding any specific focus or issue ...
we do not perceive what input or assistance we could provide by way of a response ... should ... a specific focus or
issue come to the Reviewer’s
mind upon which she would like to receive our input and comments, please advise
us and we would provide a
response within a reasonable time frame from the receipt of the request (pg 14)
The submission, from the Employer Community included a wide range of concerns
and recommendations which included:
- Policies and Practices Relating to Supporting Injured Workers Return to Work
- Evaluation of Current WorkSafeBC Policy and Practices through a Gender-based Analysis Plus (GBA+) Lens
- Modernizing WorkSafeBC’s Culture to reflect a Worker-Centric Service Delivery Model
- Recommendations Dealing with Improved Case Management of Injured Workers
- Specific Steps Required to Increase Confidence of Workers and Employers in the Workers’ Compensation System (Including, but not limited to the Fair Practices Office
- as well as other Urgent Compensation Issues not addressed in the Final Report to the Board of Directors of WorkSafeBC on the Unappropriated Balance in the Accident Fund ....
It seems the Employer
Community also had concerns about several recurrent themes raised in response to recommendations
dealing with improved case management of injured workers (pg 14 & 15).
The most frequently raised concerns by the Employer Community related to
the adequacy of the timing and/or contents of communications between an
Employer representative and a Board Officer with respect to some aspect of
Board case management of the Employer’s injured worker.
In that Employer
Community Submission to the Workers’
Compensation System Review,
concerns were raised that Board Officers often do not answer their phones or return
the calls in a timely manner, if at all, or leave recorded messages saying they
will return your call in 3 – 4 business days.
... the timeliness of communications was raised as a particular
concern by Employers who were seeking information from and/or the assistance of
Board Officers in order to develop an early Return to Work plan for the injured
worker. In the view of the Employer Community, this is an unacceptable business
practice, and is definitely not a “worker-centred” approach with respect to
dealing with inquiries involving the case management of injured workers.
The Employer Community suggests that the use of email by Board Officers,
who are involved in the case management of injured workers, to communicate with
injured workers and their Employers would be one potential resolution to this
concern.
Turning to the Independent Contractors and
Business Association (ICBA), another of the Employer Community Member, they
indicated that the group was withdrawing for a number of reasons, including
the fact that;
... Janet Patterson, appointed by NDP
Labour Minister Harry Bains, was previously an advisor to the BC Federation of
Labour had co-authored a BC Fed report entitled “Insult to Injury – Changes to
the BC Workers’ Compensation System”, and that she was undertaking an extensive
system-wide review of WSBC based on the work she did for the BC Fed in 2009 ...
and that ... Patterson and her co-authors had drafted 24 recommendations for
the BC Fed for radical changes to WorkSafe BC, and that in outlining the focus
of her review, all but one of those recommendations were included!
Quoting
the ICBA:
In the view of the Employer Community, the list of “selected issues” completely alters the scope of the “focused review” to a comprehensive examination of all aspects of the workers’ compensation system. It is important to recognize that recent comprehensive system reviews have taken much longer. Because of the need for extensive consultation one took almost a year to complete and the other two years. The employer community was given less than a month to prepare constructive input into what has become a system-wide review.
In the view of the Employer Community, the list of “selected issues” completely alters the scope of the “focused review” to a comprehensive examination of all aspects of the workers’ compensation system. It is important to recognize that recent comprehensive system reviews have taken much longer. Because of the need for extensive consultation one took almost a year to complete and the other two years. The employer community was given less than a month to prepare constructive input into what has become a system-wide review.
What
the review had, or was becoming, definitely does NOT sound like what Labour
Minister Harry indicated it was to be,
when he announced (Apr 2019) the appointment of a retired labour
lawyer, Janet Patterson, to undertake the independent review, to
assess:
- the system’s policies and practices that support injured workers’ return to work;
- WorkSafeBC’s current policies and practices through a gender and diversity-based analysis (commonly referred to as GBA +);
- modernizing WorkSafeBC’s culture to reflect a worker-centric service delivery model;
- the case management of injured workers; and
- potential amendments to the Workers Compensation Act arising from this focused review.
Bains went on to state that the ... formal review being undertaken by
Patterson builds on work undertaken by WorkSafeBC over the past year to
identify areas for improvement.
Placing an individual (such as Janet Patterson) who appears to have a definite
pro-labour stance, seems kind of like putting the fox in charge of the hen
house. No wonder then the statement from the ICBA indicated that:
As a
result, the Employer Community has lost confidence that the current Review can
be conducted in an “independent, impartial and balanced manner” as was provided
for in Ms. Patterson’s original Review’s Terms of Reference. The Employer
Community has decided not to participate further in this review.
A June BC government
news released reported that ... engagement on British Columbia’s workers’
compensation system and how to shift the system to become more worker centred,
as well as how to increase worker and employer confidence, is open for feedback.
It certainly seems like the employers community has definitely made bit known that it has no confidence in the process ... and they have indeed given their feedback as to why.
It certainly seems like the employers community has definitely made bit known that it has no confidence in the process ... and they have indeed given their feedback as to why.
Comments
Post a Comment