Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Employer Community – this is an unacceptable business practice, and definitely not a ‘worker-centred’ approach with respect to dealing with inquiries injured workers


Just one of a number of business and industry associations in BC, the Vancouver Regional Construction Association (VRCA) signed on to an employer community submission to the Workers’ Compensation System (WorkSafeBC) Review, a number of weeks back. At the time, the submission was endorsed by 46 sectoral and cross-sectoral business organizations representing small, medium and large businesses in virtually all aspects of the B.C. economy.

Balanced WorkSafeBC policies and practices support healthy, safe and productive workplaces for all,” said Fiona Famulak, VRCA president. "A review of a system such as WorkSafeBC, which is integral to the operations of every business in the province, needs to be clearly defined and given sufficient time for industry and public consultation." 

A July 19th letter to Ms. Janet Patterson, Reviewer for the Workers’ Compensation System Review, Famulak indicated however that ... we are concerned that the compressed timeline set for the Review may compromise the ability to have proper examination and full and meaningful consultation with industry stakeholders such as ourselves.

Additionally, the Employer Community Submission to the Workers’ Compensation System Review, prepared for Janet Paterson, stated:

... the Reviewer did not provide any insight regarding any specific focus or issue ... we do not perceive what input or assistance we could provide by way of a response ... should ... a specific focus or issue come to the Reviewer’s mind upon which she would like to receive our input and comments, please advise us and we would provide a response within a reasonable time frame from the receipt of the request (pg 14)

The submission, from the Employer Community included a wide range of concerns and recommendations which included:


  • Policies and Practices Relating to Supporting Injured Workers Return to Work 
  • Evaluation of Current WorkSafeBC Policy and Practices through a Gender-based Analysis Plus (GBA+) Lens 
  • Modernizing WorkSafeBC’s Culture to reflect a Worker-Centric Service Delivery Model 
  • Recommendations Dealing with Improved Case Management of Injured Workers 
  • Specific Steps Required to Increase Confidence of Workers and Employers in the Workers’ Compensation System (Including, but not limited to the Fair Practices Office 
  • as well as other Urgent Compensation Issues not addressed in the Final Report to the Board of Directors of WorkSafeBC on the Unappropriated Balance in the Accident Fund ....


It seems the Employer Community also had concerns about several recurrent themes raised in response to recommendations dealing with improved case management of injured workers (pg 14 & 15). 

The most frequently raised concerns by the Employer Community related to the adequacy of the timing and/or contents of communications between an Employer representative and a Board Officer with respect to some aspect of Board case management of the Employer’s injured worker.

In that Employer Community Submission to the Workers’ Compensation System Review, concerns were raised that Board Officers often do not answer their phones or return the calls in a timely manner, if at all, or leave recorded messages saying they will return your call in 3 – 4 business days.

... the timeliness of communications was raised as a particular concern by Employers who were seeking information from and/or the assistance of Board Officers in order to develop an early Return to Work plan for the injured worker. In the view of the Employer Community, this is an unacceptable business practice, and is definitely not a “worker-centred” approach with respect to dealing with inquiries involving the case management of injured workers.

The Employer Community suggests that the use of email by Board Officers, who are involved in the case management of injured workers, to communicate with injured workers and their Employers would be one potential resolution to this concern.

Turning to the Independent Contractors and Business Association (ICBA), another of the Employer Community Member, they indicated that the group was withdrawing for a number of reasons, including the fact that;

... Janet Patterson, appointed by NDP Labour Minister Harry Bains, was previously an advisor to the BC Federation of Labour had co-authored a BC Fed report entitled “Insult to Injury – Changes to the BC Workers’ Compensation System”, and that she was undertaking an extensive system-wide review of WSBC based on the work she did for the BC Fed in 2009 ... and that ... Patterson and her co-authors had drafted 24 recommendations for the BC Fed for radical changes to WorkSafe BC, and that in outlining the focus of her review, all but one of those recommendations were included!

Quoting the ICBA:

In the view of the Employer Community, the list of “selected issues” completely alters the scope of the “focused review” to a comprehensive examination of all aspects of the workers’ compensation system. It is important to recognize that recent comprehensive system reviews have taken much longer. Because of the need for extensive consultation one took almost a year to complete and the other two years. The employer community was given less than a month to prepare constructive input into what has become a system-wide review.

What the review had, or was becoming, definitely does NOT sound like what Labour Minister Harry indicated it was to be, when he announced (Apr 2019) the appointment of a retired labour lawyer, Janet Patterson, to undertake the independent review, to assess:

  • the system’s policies and practices that support injured workers’ return to work;
  • WorkSafeBC’s current policies and practices through a gender and diversity-based analysis (commonly referred to as GBA +);
  • modernizing WorkSafeBC’s culture to reflect a worker-centric service delivery model;
  • the case management of injured workers; and
  • potential amendments to the Workers Compensation Act arising from this focused review.

Bains went on to state that the ... formal review being undertaken by Patterson builds on work undertaken by WorkSafeBC over the past year to identify areas for improvement.

Placing an individual (such as Janet Patterson) who appears to have a definite pro-labour stance, seems kind of like putting the fox in charge of the hen house. No wonder then the statement from the ICBA indicated that:

As a result, the Employer Community has lost confidence that the current Review can be conducted in an “independent, impartial and balanced manner” as was provided for in Ms. Patterson’s original Review’s Terms of Reference. The Employer Community has decided not to participate further in this review.

A June BC government news released reported that ... engagement on British Columbia’s workers’ compensation system and how to shift the system to become more worker centred, as well as how to increase worker and employer confidence, is open for feedback.

It certainly seems like the employers community has definitely made bit known that it has no confidence in the process ... and they have indeed given their feedback as to why.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: As a BC Conservative member, and campaign worker, I will again state that the fact these errors were found -- AND brought to light BY Elections BC -- shows the system IS working

Sadly, two and a half weeks after the BC provincial election campaign, those who want to undermine our political process are still at.  PLUS, we also have one who doesn’t even live in our country, never mind our province. I speak of the buffoon running for President of the United States, who has poisoned the well when it comes to faith in the electoral process. Just today alone, comments such as the following, were being made of posts that I shared online: ... all the votes they keep finding has just favoured NDP on in all critical ridings and soon they will flip another riding in favour of NDP, Come on. ... Elections BC has ridiculed British Columbians, and I no longer have confidence or trust in their process and competence regarding the results Then there are others online, with comments like these – who are claiming fraud in the October 19th election: ... Who is the oversight for Elections BC? They should be investigated for election fraud! ... Fraudulent election ... should be red

“With the talent and dedication of this caucus we will hold David Eby to account for his government’s out of control spending and ongoing failures in healthcare, public safety and addictions" — John Rustad

Today, John Rustad, Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia, proudly unveiled his shadow cabinet, a dynamic team of talented individuals ready to hold David Eby’s disastrous government accountable and present a strong alternative vision for British Columbia. “ Our shadow cabinet is a diverse and experienced group, committed to restoring prosperity, public safety, and affordability for every British Columbian ,” said Rustad. “ With experts in every field, we are focused on delivering real solutions for the challenges our province faces .” Rustad emphasized the historic appointment of Aaliya Warbus as House Leader. The shadow cabinet reflects the Conservative Party’s vision to build a brighter future for British Columbia. The appointments are as follows: Leadership Positions : Aaliya Warbus – House Leader Bruce Banman – Whip Sheldon Claire – Deputy Whip Portfolios : Tony Luck – Municipal Affairs and Local Government Sharon Hartwell – Rural Communities and Rural Development I

Labels

Show more