Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Employer Community – this is an unacceptable business practice, and definitely not a ‘worker-centred’ approach with respect to dealing with inquiries injured workers


Just one of a number of business and industry associations in BC, the Vancouver Regional Construction Association (VRCA) signed on to an employer community submission to the Workers’ Compensation System (WorkSafeBC) Review, a number of weeks back. At the time, the submission was endorsed by 46 sectoral and cross-sectoral business organizations representing small, medium and large businesses in virtually all aspects of the B.C. economy.

“Balanced WorkSafeBC policies and practices support healthy, safe and productive workplaces for all,” said Fiona Famulak, VRCA president. "A review of a system such as WorkSafeBC, which is integral to the operations of every business in the province, needs to be clearly defined and given sufficient time for industry and public consultation." 

A July 19th letter to Ms. Janet Patterson, Reviewer for the Workers’ Compensation System Review, Famulak indicated however that ... we are concerned that the compressed timeline set for the Review may compromise the ability to have proper examination and full and meaningful consultation with industry stakeholders such as ourselves.

Additionally, the Employer Community Submission to the Workers’ Compensation System Review, prepared for Janet Paterson, stated:

... the Reviewer did not provide any insight regarding any specific focus or issue ... we do not perceive what input or assistance we could provide by way of a response ... should ... a specific focus or issue come to the Reviewer’s mind upon which she would like to receive our input and comments, please advise us and we would provide a response within a reasonable time frame from the receipt of the request (pg 14)

The submission, from the Employer Community included a wide range of concerns and recommendations which included:


  • Policies and Practices Relating to Supporting Injured Workers Return to Work 
  • Evaluation of Current WorkSafeBC Policy and Practices through a Gender-based Analysis Plus (GBA+) Lens 
  • Modernizing WorkSafeBC’s Culture to reflect a Worker-Centric Service Delivery Model 
  • Recommendations Dealing with Improved Case Management of Injured Workers 
  • Specific Steps Required to Increase Confidence of Workers and Employers in the Workers’ Compensation System (Including, but not limited to the Fair Practices Office 
  • as well as other Urgent Compensation Issues not addressed in the Final Report to the Board of Directors of WorkSafeBC on the Unappropriated Balance in the Accident Fund ....


It seems the Employer Community also had concerns about several recurrent themes raised in response to recommendations dealing with improved case management of injured workers (pg 14 & 15). 

The most frequently raised concerns by the Employer Community related to the adequacy of the timing and/or contents of communications between an Employer representative and a Board Officer with respect to some aspect of Board case management of the Employer’s injured worker.

In that Employer Community Submission to the Workers’ Compensation System Review, concerns were raised that Board Officers often do not answer their phones or return the calls in a timely manner, if at all, or leave recorded messages saying they will return your call in 3 – 4 business days.

... the timeliness of communications was raised as a particular concern by Employers who were seeking information from and/or the assistance of Board Officers in order to develop an early Return to Work plan for the injured worker. In the view of the Employer Community, this is an unacceptable business practice, and is definitely not a “worker-centred” approach with respect to dealing with inquiries involving the case management of injured workers.

The Employer Community suggests that the use of email by Board Officers, who are involved in the case management of injured workers, to communicate with injured workers and their Employers would be one potential resolution to this concern.

Turning to the Independent Contractors and Business Association (ICBA), another of the Employer Community Member, they indicated that the group was withdrawing for a number of reasons, including the fact that;

... Janet Patterson, appointed by NDP Labour Minister Harry Bains, was previously an advisor to the BC Federation of Labour had co-authored a BC Fed report entitled “Insult to Injury – Changes to the BC Workers’ Compensation System”, and that she was undertaking an extensive system-wide review of WSBC based on the work she did for the BC Fed in 2009 ... and that ... Patterson and her co-authors had drafted 24 recommendations for the BC Fed for radical changes to WorkSafe BC, and that in outlining the focus of her review, all but one of those recommendations were included!

Quoting the ICBA:

In the view of the Employer Community, the list of “selected issues” completely alters the scope of the “focused review” to a comprehensive examination of all aspects of the workers’ compensation system. It is important to recognize that recent comprehensive system reviews have taken much longer. Because of the need for extensive consultation one took almost a year to complete and the other two years. The employer community was given less than a month to prepare constructive input into what has become a system-wide review.

What the review had, or was becoming, definitely does NOT sound like what Labour Minister Harry indicated it was to be, when he announced (Apr 2019) the appointment of a retired labour lawyer, Janet Patterson, to undertake the independent review, to assess:

  • the system’s policies and practices that support injured workers’ return to work;
  • WorkSafeBC’s current policies and practices through a gender and diversity-based analysis (commonly referred to as GBA +);
  • modernizing WorkSafeBC’s culture to reflect a worker-centric service delivery model;
  • the case management of injured workers; and
  • potential amendments to the Workers Compensation Act arising from this focused review.

Bains went on to state that the ... formal review being undertaken by Patterson builds on work undertaken by WorkSafeBC over the past year to identify areas for improvement.

Placing an individual (such as Janet Patterson) who appears to have a definite pro-labour stance, seems kind of like putting the fox in charge of the hen house. No wonder then the statement from the ICBA indicated that:

As a result, the Employer Community has lost confidence that the current Review can be conducted in an “independent, impartial and balanced manner” as was provided for in Ms. Patterson’s original Review’s Terms of Reference. The Employer Community has decided not to participate further in this review.

A June BC government news released reported that ... engagement on British Columbia’s workers’ compensation system and how to shift the system to become more worker centred, as well as how to increase worker and employer confidence, is open for feedback.

It certainly seems like the employers community has definitely made bit known that it has no confidence in the process ... and they have indeed given their feedback as to why.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...
Post a Comment
Read more

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more