Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Jump-starting the economy through interprovincial trade


With the vaccine rollout in full swing, the public’s attention is increasingly focused on economic recovery. In a research paper published by the Montreal Economic Institute, researchers Miguel Ouellette and Krystle Wittevrongel propose a very simple solution: a true free trade agreement among the Canadian provinces.

 

This publication includes among other things a ranking of the provinces and territories according to their openness to internal trade. Alberta takes first place, and Quebec comes in last.

 

“While the provinces negotiated an agreement in 2017, barriers to trade remain and the majority of provinces have made no progress,” points out economist Miguel Ouellette. “In fact, British Columbia now has more trade barriers than it did in 2017.”

 

“This is a very important debate. The elimination of trade barriers could grow the Canadian economy by 3.8% per capita with very little effort and no public spending,” continues Mr. Ouellette. “Moreover, it is the poorer provinces that would benefit the most. In the case of Quebec, we’re talking about a possible GDP per capita increase of 4.6%. Looking to the east, Prince Edward Island’s GDP per capita could increase by more than 16% per capita.”

 

“Getting rid of obstacles to inter-provincial trade is a very powerful tool that could improve the standard of living of Canadians. If Manitoba could have traded freely with all Canadian provinces as of the year 2000, we estimate that it would have caught up to Ontario in 2013 in terms of GDP per capita,” explains Krystle Wittevrongel.

 

“There are very few more pivotal measures that our governments could adopt at the moment,” says the public policy analyst. “In addition to stimulating the entire Canadian economy, it’s also an effective measure to allow the less prosperous provinces to do some catching up economically.

 

It is simply ridiculous that it should be easier to trade with the United States than with other Canadian provinces. Given the protectionist measures that could be put in place by our southern neighbour, the need to act is even more urgent,” concludes Ms. Wittevrongel.

 

 

The 2021 Edition of our Internal Trade Provincial Leadership Index is available on our website.

 

 

The Montreal Economic Institute ... is an independent public policy think tank. Through its publications, media appearances, and advisory services to policy-makers, the MEI stimulates public policy debate and reforms based on sound economics and entrepreneurship.

Comments

  1. ‘Supreme Court Screws Up Again’ (Interprovincial Trade) {April 21, 2018}:
    "Another court decision that damages Canada and is caused by flawed and illogical Constitutional ‘interpretations’ from our politicized and unaccountable Supreme Court of Canada:

    “Enter the Supreme Court of Canada with a decision that eviscerates any real hope that Canada will ever have what real nations such as Australia and the United States enjoy — legal protection of internal free trade...”

    https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2018/04/21/supreme-court-screws-up-again/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more