Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WUN FEATHER -- If people hate me because I am an Indian, they will still hate me if you change my name to Aboriginal, Indigenous, or whatever name you choose

 

On February 22 it was the International day to end racial discrimination. As luck would have it, I was working on a PowerPoint presentation with my team that focusses on Indigenous awareness on that day.

 


If you were to ask me about all the forms of racism in Canada or North America right now, I would have to bow my head in shame. Never in my 64 years on this planet have I seen it this bad. I have actually seen anti racist education that included "Whiteness" and "White-privilege" in their headlines.

 

How in the world can we possibly end racism if we say things like that?

 

Individual racism is something that happens between people when they interact with each other. Racism knows no boundaries and is not limited to a person's ancestry or religious beliefs. It has been magnified lately when certain groups are allowed to suggest that certain lives matter more than other lives.

 

If you put a race at the beginning of that sentence, you have just admitted to being a racist.

 

In a world where there was no racism at all, every life would matter equally ... period. If you argue with me on that point, that means you hold one or more races to a higher importance, and that is our problem.

 

Systemic racism happens when schools or institutions, or the "system" follows a discriminatory path legislated by a prejudiced society. If I was to begin somewhere, that would be the easiest thing to change, but we are not going to get anywhere by having government officials tell us that one race is more important or more equal than another. We are not going to end racism by changing my name to something else.

 

If people hate me because I am an Indian, they will still hate me if you change my name to Aboriginal, Indigenous, or whatever name you choose. You cannot possibly change the way someone feels about something by changing its name. The thought of that actually makes me laugh out loud.

 

If you were to change the name of a mosquito to a name like winged messenger, would people's attitude toward the mosquito change? Ok. Bad example because none of us really like mosquitoes.

 

Choose something that some people like, that others don't ... like Cilantro. Oh my gosh, I hate that stuff! But my wife absolutely loves it. That's a better example. If she was to make me a salad and change the name of cilantro to Coriander, would she be able to make me love the taste? No, my mind would still be set, I don't like that stuff.

 

If you think I am being overly simplistic about the effect that changing my name from Indian to Indigenous will make, then you need to wake up. That's how much difference a name change makes.

 

In order to actually change how people view each other, when it comes to their race, we need education. But that education cannot blame one race for all our problems! Here is another example for you.

 

Let's take a group of kids who are all exactly the same ethnicity in a playground. Everyone is playing an outdoor sport. One of these social justice warriors comes along and virtue signals the situation by suggesting that one of the kids is not being treated "equally enough” and tells the other kids to let him or her have more time with the ball. 

 

What happens in that situation, is all the other kids will form an opinion about the one who was singled out by the social justice warrior. Why is that kid supposed to get more equal treatment than the rest of us?

 

Justin Trudeau and the Liberal government are doing that, and the media add flames to the fire. They tell society that a certain race is being picked on all the time, and they blame the white folks. 

 

What the hell? Then all of a sudden everyone hates white people. Racism is not white. It is within every single one of us if we allow it to be.

 

In fact, some of my very own people call me an Apple because I am well educated and work hard for a living. They use the word Apple because it describes something that is red on the outside, and white in the inside.

 


What they are actually suggesting is that someone who is brown throughout, could not possibly have a good job or be educated. That is a "white privilege". See how ironic that is?  And that racial situation is within a race.

 

Instead of trying to look at all people being the same, we should take a long hard look at how diverse we are. We need to look at each other and understand that we are indeed different. Ending racial discrimination is not a process where everyone gets thrown into a big social blender and we all come out the same -- a social melting pot.

 

I won't comply to that way of thinking.

 

I have the deepest regard for all my friends and their past and history, regardless of their nationality, their gender, or their religion. But I have no respect for those who would hold one race in higher esteem over another, and even less respect for those who would blame one race for all of life's vicissitudes.

Comments

  1. P.S. Excellent column. Your point of view needs to become mainstream if we are to regain our common sense...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...

Labels

Show more