Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

“This Isn’t Harm Reduction — It’s Harm Denial”: MLA Claire Rattée and MLA Elenore Sturko Slam Government’s Hypocritical Stance on Recovery


Claire Rattée, MLA for Skeena and Official Opposition Critic for Mental Health and Addictions, is calling out the provincial government for what she describes as a “dangerously defeatist” and hypocritical approach to addiction recovery — following a Ministry of Health update that confirmed patients are not told about recovery-based treatment options unless they explicitly ask.

“This government would never take this approach with cancer, diabetes, or even vaccinations — imagine if we told patients we’d only offer vaccines if they specifically requested them,” said Rattée. “By that logic, should we be launching massive education campaigns to schoolchildren warning them that if they ever try drugs, they’re doomed? That there’s no hope? That recovery isn’t even worth talking about?”

In a June 4 news release, the Ministry of Health reiterated its stance that individuals in the healthcare system are not proactively informed about abstinence-based recovery unless they request it. Critics argue that this policy — when paired with open drug use in so-called “supportive” housing — amounts to government-sanctioned hopelessness.

Elenore Sturko, MLA for Surrey-Cloverdale and the Official Opposition Critic for Public Safety and Solicitor General, says the policy confirms what families have been afraid of for years.

“We’ve heard from countless parents, siblings, and friends who say the system never once talked to their loved ones about recovery. Not once,” said Sturko. “This government has abandoned its responsibility to elevate people’s health and safety, showing that they are not creating a recovery-oriented system of care.”

The BC Conservative Caucus is calling for a complete overhaul of the province’s addictions strategy — including a shift toward a treatment-first approach, a ban on drug use in government-funded supportive housing, and the immediate inclusion of recovery options in every point of care.

“This is not harm reduction. It’s harm denial,” said Rattée. “People deserve to be offered a path to healing. They deserve more than to be handed hydromorphone and left to die in a shelter hallway. This government isn’t reducing harm — it’s institutionalising it.”

The Official Opposition is demanding immediate transparency from the Ministry of Health regarding how many patients have been offered — or denied — recovery options in the past five years, and is renewing its call for compassionate intervention legislation that would support individuals unable to care for themselves due to severe addiction or mental illness.

“Our most vulnerable citizens need our help the most,” said Rattée. “It’s not compassionate to tell them there’s nothing we can do unless they beg for it. That’s not care. That’s cowardice.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NDP Government Blames Everyone but Themselves

The federal government has announced new measures to support British Columbia's forestry sector, including $65 million in funding for projects across the province. While any support is welcome, it falls far short of the level of assistance other provinces have secured for key industries. Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer says the NDP government needs to take responsibility for its mismanagement of B.C.’s forest industry instead of trying to pass on the blame. Despite promising to create more jobs in the forest sector, the NDP government has overseen the loss of thousands of forestry jobs and 21 mill closures which have devastated communities. “If Premier Eby spent more time addressing the regulatory issues impacting the forestry sector than he did complaining about the federal government, we would not be in the position we are now,” said Stamer. “And instead of trying to place the blame for mill closures on Donald Trump, Minister of Forests Ravi Parmar should t...

Nurses Take Job Action After Years of NDP Neglect

Image Credit:  BC Nurses Union BC nurses have reached a breaking point after years of unsafe conditions, rising violence in the workplace and a government that wouldn’t listen. Now they are on the picket line fighting to be heard. Last week, nurses began job action with a 72-hour strike notice, refusing non-essential overtime and stepping back from non-nursing duties. As of Tuesday, they have escalated to picket lines for the first time in decades. This moment was avoidable. It is the result of years of unanswered concerns from the frontline workers who keep our hospitals running. Nurses have been raising the same concerns for years: unsafe staffing levels, rising violence on the job, and a workload no single person should have to carry. None of it is new, and none of it should have taken a strike vote to get the government's attention. "Nurses are exercising their legal right to job action, but it shouldn’t have had to come to this," said Kiel Giddens, MLA for...

British Columbians Still Don’t Know Who’s Paying for NDP’s BC Hydro Deal

The NDP is making billion-dollar promises with BC Hydro, but British Columbians still don’t know who will pay the bill. Last week’s memorandum of understanding isn’t what the federal government and the NDP are making it out to be. It’s an admission that the NDP failed to make the long-term investments needed to keep B.C. powered. Now British Columbians have serious questions about the cost and whether BC Hydro ratepayers will end up paying the price. David L. Williams, MLA for Salmon Arm-Shuswap and Shadow Minister for BC Hydro and Electrical Energy Development , said British Columbians deserve clear answers about the full implications of the Canada–British Columbia Cooperative Prosperity Agreement. “British Columbians deserve the full truth,” said Mr. Williams. “This multi-billion-dollar announcement does not answer who pays for cost overruns, who pays for new generation, who carries the risk if industrial customers do not materialize, or whether ratepayers will be forced ...

Labels

Show more