Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Carney's offer to MAGA, advice for Alberta, and well-wishes for an outgoing Liberal MP

It was a big week for Prime Minister Mark Carney's one-liners. On two occasions he made headlines for his offers to help U.S. President Donald Trump with his vow to "make America great again" and his advice to Alberta Premier Danielle Smith given what he saw first-hand with Brexit. 

Plus, ardent environmentalist Steven Guilbeault has finally had enough, and why one bill proposing easier access to digital evidence has privacy and tech heavyweights sounding alarm bells.

 


The week that was



Let's start with the most recent development because it could be the most consequential of the week. 

While some Liberals may have bristled at Carney's offer to "help make America great again," the olive branch of sorts – or at least an employment of some loaded language – went over like a warm blanket with one key U.S. official. 

In case you missed it Thursday, employing U.S. President Donald Trump's marquee slogan, Carney told a New York City business crowd that "Canada strong will help make America great again."

And in a first sign of a potential thaw, it appears that line was well received by U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra.

"PM Carney said something worth repeating today: 'A Canada strong will help make America great again.' I think a lot of Americans can get behind that kind of positive message," he said on X, reposting a video of the prime minister's speech.

In that speech, the prime minister detailed his economic diversification strategy, and his plans to recalibrate Canada's relationships and reputation. Touting some key areas where the federal Liberals have made progress, Carney sought to make the case for why Canada and the U.S. should continue to co-operate in key sectors.

"Above all, as you would expect, we're focused on things that are good for Canada. This is good for all Canadians, but it’s also good for the United States," the prime minister said. "Because a stronger Canada is a better ally."

For more from his speech and fireside chat, the full rundown is here.

It didn’t go over quite as well with Carney's biggest critic on this side of the border.

Rising in the House of Commons to offer his rebuttal to the prime minister's remarks, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre joked that Carney was in New York to "expand his favourite export: speeches."

"His elbows were again flapping up and down, in the rhetorical chicken dance, as he cannot seem to decide if integration with the U.S. is a strength or a weakness, he's argued passionately for both positions in the last three months alone," Poilievre said. 

Carney was in The Big Apple to pitch Canada to major CEOs and investors. 

According to his office, among the bigwigs he had facetime with were representative from BlackRock, Blackstone, and Morgan Stanley. He also "participated in a conversation" with members of a business roundtable, including Netflix, Inc.'s Ted Sarandos, Land O'Lakes Inc.'s Beth Ford, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.'s Stephane de La Faverie, and Mick Beekhuizen from the Campbell's Company.  



Facing questions earlier in the week about what a potential Alberta separation referendum could signal to energy investors at a time where he's pushing for more major projects, the prime minister offered some advice "from experience" to his provincial counterpart. 

"In these separation issues, it is often advanced that: 'Vote for this, and it’s a free option.' 'Vote for this, and we will strengthen your hand in future negotiation.' That is a very dangerous bluff," Carney told reporters Monday.

As colleague Spencer Van Dyk reports, referencing his time as governor of the Bank of England during Brexit – when the United Kingdom narrowly voted to leave the European Union – the prime minister said that 10 years later they're still "trying to undo what people didn't think they were voting for." 

Smith shot back saying it's ultimately for voters in her province to decide, not Ottawa. 

"We had 400,000 people sign a petition saying they wanted to vote to remain, and 300,000 sign a petition saying they wanted to vote to leave, so that's 700,000 people who have asked for this to be publicly debated and put on the ballot," she said. 

The major Ottawa bubble story of the week was of course Trudeau-era Liberal and staunch environmentalist Steven Guilbeault announcing he'll resign his seat in the House of Commons later this summer. 

While he'll continue to be a member of the Liberal caucus until then – giving them one extra vote to pass what they need to before the break –  Guilbeault told CTV News that he's not the only caucus member who's upset with the Liberals' environmental policy shift since last year's election. 

"If you look at our campaign platform during the last election — that platform, commitments that we made to Canadians — mentioned climate change 28 times," Guilbeault said in an interview with Vassy Kapelos on Wednesday. "It did not mention 'pipeline' once."

"So, I think rightfully so, some people, whether they're Liberal caucus members, whether they're Canadians at large, are wondering what is happening," he added.

Carney was courteous about Guilbeault's decision, though he said the deal-making he's been doing towards new natural resource development was "absolutely" worth it. 

For more from the outgoing MP in his own words on why he left, and what effort the PMO made to get him to stay, that's here. 

Lastly, on the procurement and major project fronts, there were two big announcements this week that could be a signal of things to come. 

Does the decision to go with Sweden company Saab's "GlobalEye" aerial warning system signal anything about the non-U.S. origins of other outstanding military procurements? And was the Germans signing on to buy Canadian LNG an attempt to sweeten their submarine bid? Time will tell. 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nurses Take Job Action After Years of NDP Neglect

Image Credit:  BC Nurses Union BC nurses have reached a breaking point after years of unsafe conditions, rising violence in the workplace and a government that wouldn’t listen. Now they are on the picket line fighting to be heard. Last week, nurses began job action with a 72-hour strike notice, refusing non-essential overtime and stepping back from non-nursing duties. As of Tuesday, they have escalated to picket lines for the first time in decades. This moment was avoidable. It is the result of years of unanswered concerns from the frontline workers who keep our hospitals running. Nurses have been raising the same concerns for years: unsafe staffing levels, rising violence on the job, and a workload no single person should have to carry. None of it is new, and none of it should have taken a strike vote to get the government's attention. "Nurses are exercising their legal right to job action, but it shouldn’t have had to come to this," said Kiel Giddens, MLA for...

British Columbians Still Don’t Know Who’s Paying for NDP’s BC Hydro Deal

The NDP is making billion-dollar promises with BC Hydro, but British Columbians still don’t know who will pay the bill. Last week’s memorandum of understanding isn’t what the federal government and the NDP are making it out to be. It’s an admission that the NDP failed to make the long-term investments needed to keep B.C. powered. Now British Columbians have serious questions about the cost and whether BC Hydro ratepayers will end up paying the price. David L. Williams, MLA for Salmon Arm-Shuswap and Shadow Minister for BC Hydro and Electrical Energy Development , said British Columbians deserve clear answers about the full implications of the Canada–British Columbia Cooperative Prosperity Agreement. “British Columbians deserve the full truth,” said Mr. Williams. “This multi-billion-dollar announcement does not answer who pays for cost overruns, who pays for new generation, who carries the risk if industrial customers do not materialize, or whether ratepayers will be forced ...

NDP Government Blames Everyone but Themselves

The federal government has announced new measures to support British Columbia's forestry sector, including $65 million in funding for projects across the province. While any support is welcome, it falls far short of the level of assistance other provinces have secured for key industries. Conservative Forests Critic Ward Stamer says the NDP government needs to take responsibility for its mismanagement of B.C.’s forest industry instead of trying to pass on the blame. Despite promising to create more jobs in the forest sector, the NDP government has overseen the loss of thousands of forestry jobs and 21 mill closures which have devastated communities. “If Premier Eby spent more time addressing the regulatory issues impacting the forestry sector than he did complaining about the federal government, we would not be in the position we are now,” said Stamer. “And instead of trying to place the blame for mill closures on Donald Trump, Minister of Forests Ravi Parmar should t...

Labels

Show more