Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- It's a bad situation. There is a looming environmental, social and economic disaster


Earlier this month, my colleague Andrew Weaver asked Hon. Michelle Mungall, Minister of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, about orphan oil and gas wells in British Columbia. The Auditor General of British Columbia reviewed the situation in our province and reported that the number of orphan sites is dramatically increasing and the funds set aside by companies is falling well short of what is needed.

We have a problem with the orphans, but it’s not just a problem in British Columbia. The $3 billion price tag that British Columbians will likely be on the hook for is small in comparison to the estimated $50-70 billion that Albertans can expect.

Western provinces have a regulatory problem.


Does the polluter pay?
In our province, the Oil and Gas Commission regulates the industry. Apparently, we have a polluter pays principle. This means the company who is causing the mess is responsible for cleaning it up. However, in the case of the liabilities of companies that are now bankrupt, the cost is offloaded to the public purse — you and me and our children. While the companies must put a security deposit down to cover the cost of the future cleanup, the Orphan Fund is millions short.

Commons is a Canadaland podcast hosted by Arshy Mann. In the latest season "Crude" he his diving into our history of how Canada became a petro-state. There is an episode on the growing problem with orphan wells and how the oil and gas industry is sidestepping its responsibility and putting it into the hands of the people.

There are a lot of orphans in the oil and gas industry, but these are just one concern.

What about the orphan pipeline that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau bought? Or how about another kind of orphan: First Nations communities left explaining to their members how they are going to fill the space in the vacuum following the evaporation of LNG speculators, the midnight movers vanishing into the darkness.

This devastates modern treaty communities like Malahat and Huu-ay-aht who desperately need to create stable sources of revenue and who are nothing more than leverage for oil and gas players.


Whose interest does government serve?

It's a bad situation. There is a looming environmental, social and economic disaster. Increasingly, Minister Mungall stands and defends the system with massive loopholes that the oil and gas industry exploits. It's a system that is failing the public, whose interests she has sworn to protect.
 
There are a lot of orphans in the oil and gas
industry, but these are just one concern
There is a growing public demand that government get out of the business of subsidizing oil and gas. Unfortunately, the BC NDP government continues to roll out same plan as the BC Liberals before them. This government must stop hiding under the "polluter pay" rhetoric, and actually make the polluter pay. 

As the unfolding storyline in Commons highlights, and as we have heard repeatedly about the National Energy Board hearing on the Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project, the provincial and federal regulators have been captured by industry.


Industry capture
The unhealthy relationship with the extractive industries is part of the DNA of our provinces and country. It's been the source of much of my frustration in numerous recent posts about logging and fisheries.

When searching for solutions we have to start with raising awareness. British Columbians need to know the economic boom for corporate interest is actually a bust for the public interest. As their awareness increases, I believe many more will demand government change.

Over and above that, we need politicians that have the political will to separate the regulators and the regulated, strengthen the rules and ensure the public interest is at the centre.

Finally, they must be willing to follow through on enforcing the rules we have.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more