I was born and raised into the forest industry. I have seen many cycles. I have never seen the situation as precarious in BC as it is right now says Nechako Lake MLA Rustad
Alan
Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 7th, 2019
Nechako
Lakes MLA John Rustad is the BC Liberal forestry critic, and yesterday his
party sent out a media release, “BC Liberals oppose John
Horgan’s forestry bill that divides communities and puts jobs at risk”
I
grew up in the Cariboo, and over a number of years saw ongoing and continuous job
reductions taking place.
The
Cariboo is a beautiful part of the province to grow up in, and so starting first
with my 1973 Toyota Corolla ... and then moving up to my Chevy half-ton truck
... I traveled pretty much every road (paved, graveled, rutted and at time what
little remained of horse drawn wagon roads dating back decades and decades).
During
those travels I also saw what was happening as small rural communities,
dependent on the forestry industry saw those job loses leading to businesses closing,
people moving away, schools closing, and government services being shuttered.
Last
night I asked Forestry Critic Rustad about the future ... this is what he had to say:
“The industry is going through some very tough times right now. Mills are taking down time, workers are scrambling to make payments or find other work (or EI) and everyone connect with the industry are worried. Confidence is low as BC has become the highest cost producer in North America”.
“The industry is going through some very tough times right now. Mills are taking down time, workers are scrambling to make payments or find other work (or EI) and everyone connect with the industry are worried. Confidence is low as BC has become the highest cost producer in North America”.
Continuing
he told me of families that he had personally talked with ... families in Ft.
St. John for example, that were really struggling:
“They have not had consistent work for almost
6 months and are asking .... where is this government? Do they care about
what’s happening and are they going to help us?”
Rustad
continued, “I asked the minister this
question during estimates the other month and unfortunately the answer was no”.
In
fact, according to the Liberal’s Rustad, an agreement was negotiated in secret
without input from the forestry sector. The impact was guessed at by the
government as nobody had thought to do an analysis before the negotiations were
basically completed.
It
turns out the agreement will mean the loss of hundreds of thousands of cubic
meters of timber annually, in the Northeast, likely leading to a mill closure
and the loss of about 500 jobs.
What
agreement you ask, and so did I of MLA Rustad?
Turns out this is the one between the province and two first
nations to protect caribou habitat.
It’s
also one where BC’s Minister of Forests, Doug Donaldson, cushions what could be
a major blown by stating that ... some local industries might be impacted and the governments will work to
ensure that the effects are limited.
What
does Rustad think?
“Industry was caught by surprise and quickly
started looking at other caribou habitat areas around the province. Will the
government be coming for them next?”
“Their analysis which was rough, and a worst-case
scenario, suggests if government goes all the way, the forest sector in the
interior of BC could see a 15 to 20 million cubic meter reduction in the annual
allowable cut”.
“Put another way”, he continued, “This represents about 40% of the total trees
harvested in BC’s interior. It would mean significant permanent closures of
forestry processing facilities”.
While
industry is aware there will have to be rationalization, due to the pending
reductions in the annual allowable cut (amount of timber available to support
the industry) ... however the uncertainty and added costs brought on by this
government are compounding the problems.
“Industry has recently said they are putting
capital plans on hold as they have no confidence in where the government is
taking them”, said Rustad, before continuing, “and the mountain caribou file is a prime example.
I
was raised in a forestry-based community with numerous large and small sawmills
(along with the requisite bee-hive burners, so yeah it was a few years ago). Those sawmills where I lived were the life
blood of our small community – when they shut down, or had to reduce the number
of shifts and lumber being cut, things got hard for all.
That’s
why I can understand this comment Rustad made directly to me:
“I was born and raised into the forest
industry. I have seen many cycles. I have never seen the situation as
precarious in BC as it is right now. Not because of markets but because of
ideology that is coming from the BC NDP government and the uncertainty it is creating”.
The
forestry and resource industries in our province have been called a ‘sunset’ one by may ... especially environmentalists.
That
would include John Horgan’s Environment Minister, and former Sierra Club Director,
George Heyman. Still Forestry Critic
John Rustad has confidence in the forest industries resilience.
“BC’s forest industry supports about 140
communities across the province. More than 140,000 jobs are created through
direct, indirect or induced employment. Forestry has been a foundational piece
of BC’s economy and I believe it will continue to do this well into the future”,
he commented.
Still,
there is Bill 22 to consider. Bill 22 basically requires industry to share
confidential information with the government. It gives the minister the ability
to suspend tenure licenses if there is a change in ownership ... or even as
simple as a change in the power structure of a board.
Commenting
on this Rustad stated, “The minister can
continue the suspension until the company has met "community
interest", whatever that is. In other words, through this bill the
minister can force companies to surrender tenure without compensation if they
partake in the pending rationalization and if the minister deems the
concentration of tenure is too high”
“This is not a rural versus urban
issue— this is a BC issue,” added Rustad. “We need policies and laws that address the immediate and long-term
viability of a sector that has been the
backbone of our province for 200 years.”
“Yet again John Horgan’s approach
to rural issues is to make unilateral decisions without engaging the very same
communities that will be impacted,” further stated Rustad.
It
sounds like the knees could be knocked out from under the forest industry – and
we haven’t even mentioned Donald Trumps attack on softwood lumber a couple of
years back, by again imposing sky high tariffs on what we ship into the United
States.
Still
many British Columbians in rural and Northern BC come from strong stock ... and
I’m betting they’ll fight for a strong economic British Columbia that can
allow, and provide, a safety net for those in need.
Comments
Post a Comment