Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

SCOTT ANDERSON -- Climate Change and the great Manure Crisis ... Part #1


"Apocalypses don't happen very often. They tend to be separated by tens or even hundreds of millions of years." — Dale Jamieson

PART ONE
Forecasting a very bad time for humanity is a very old game, beginning in the European world at least as early as the coming of Christ and quite likely long before.

Prior to the 19th century these nasty events were generally attributed to God, who would become fed up with His creation and knock us all about in retribution for sin, although shortly after the Enlightenment, end-time stories began to include natural perpetrators like sunshine and asteroids.

In the 19th century, as technology and science and the industrial revolution made Man the central actor in his own drama, human-caused disasters became the rage.

The first global warming scare came in 1858 after the first trans-Atlantic cables were laid and a scientist named Giovanni Donati supposedly discovered that the cables were acting as enormous electromagnets, pulling the earth into the sun. At the current rate of acceleration, he surmised, Europe would become tropical in 12 years, the entire earth would be dead soon after, and the whole man-made mess would be punctuated by the earth falling into the sun.

The story turned out to be a hoax, but it caught the attention of many and dominated the headlines for weeks. Man's activities could be dangerous indeed.


The
‘Great Horse Manure Crisis of 1894’ struck later in the century, involving the mathematically precise discovery that using the current mode of transportation, at the current rate of production, the streets of London would be under nine feet of horse manure within 50 years. This was no hoax, occupying as it did centre stage in 1898 at the world’s first international urban planning conference in New York and leading urban planners to believe that cities would eventually become uninhabitable.

Apparently, the internal combustion engine came along just in time to save doomed urbania.


It was only in the late 20th and early 21st centuries that more seriously existential predictions, allegedly backed by “science,” grew in scope to become terminal to humankind, firing the imagination of both politicians and the public.

There are of course periodic lesser apocalii hovering around the mediasphere vying for attention from time to time. 

For example, peak oil, popular around the turn of the millennium just before the world became awash in new discoveries of oil ...  depletion of resources, made famous in the 1972 Club of Rome report that breathlessly announced resource depletion and associated economic collapse by the end of the 20th century ... and the ozone hole, the scare de jour of the 90s that, at least according to futuristic Hollywood movies of the day, would force us to slather on blue sunscreen if we were foolish enough to venture outside.

And of course, Y2K, in which technology developed for the wrong century would do us in if we were in an elevator or airplane at midnight on December 31, 1999. But other than outliers like an arbitrary asteroid strike, they are generally second tier apocalii, bad enough to make life miserable for sure, but not enough to cause extinction.

Nuclear winter, the population bomb, and climate change are the great man made apocalyptic scares of our era, even though two of them have receded into background noise at the moment in favour of the more malleable and comprehensive “climate change,” a phenomenon in which causation of human agency is not only an unfalsifiable thesis (meaning it can be neither proven false nor proven correct), but fits every conceivable narrative.

If there’s floods, it’s climate change. If there’s droughts, it's climate change. Rain, snow, sunny days, hurricanes, annually calving ice caps, forest fires, pine beetles, the inconveniently non-existent extinction of polar bears, and even the Syrian civil war have variously been blamed on the effects of climate change. Everything proves it and it's all very, very bad.

To make it even more thrilling, its own extremists can fairly easily turn it into the end times by means of pseudo-scientific-sounding babble, with such horridly Brobdingnagian consequences as “cascading tipping points” and “climate feedbacks” leading to a “runaway greenhouse effect” and “hothouse climate state” which will turn earth into a Venus-like planet, stripped of its atmosphere, swirling with ghastly nastiness in a fiery Danse Macabre.

It's the perfect apocalypse!


— Scott Anderson, resides in Vernon, and provides comments and analysis from a bluntly conservative point of view.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Focus on the nine things I mentioned. That’s what will allow the Conservative Party to win the next election

IMAGE CREDIT:   Darryl Dyck, the Canadian Press. I thought I had already made up my mind who I would be ranking on my ballot, in the Conservative Party of BC leadership race; now I am not so sure.  That means that, at least for me, and perhaps many others, it’s a good thing voting hasn’t already taken place. There were initially only one or two of the candidates that I thought might be a little too right of centre for my liking, now it seems that list is growing. I consider myself more closely aligned with what used to be called a Progressive Conservative, regardless, I feel more than comfortable within the Conservative Party of BC.  Some, however, in messages to me on my political Facebook page, have been rather, shall we say, a bit mean-spirited in comments they’ve made about my ‘purity’ as a conservative. To tell you the truth, I really don’t care! Some leadership candidates, in comments made online, have also been raising the issue of who is a pure enough conservati...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more