Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

SCOTT ANDERSON -- Climate Change and the great Manure Crisis ... Part #1


"Apocalypses don't happen very often. They tend to be separated by tens or even hundreds of millions of years." — Dale Jamieson

PART ONE
Forecasting a very bad time for humanity is a very old game, beginning in the European world at least as early as the coming of Christ and quite likely long before.

Prior to the 19th century these nasty events were generally attributed to God, who would become fed up with His creation and knock us all about in retribution for sin, although shortly after the Enlightenment, end-time stories began to include natural perpetrators like sunshine and asteroids.

In the 19th century, as technology and science and the industrial revolution made Man the central actor in his own drama, human-caused disasters became the rage.

The first global warming scare came in 1858 after the first trans-Atlantic cables were laid and a scientist named Giovanni Donati supposedly discovered that the cables were acting as enormous electromagnets, pulling the earth into the sun. At the current rate of acceleration, he surmised, Europe would become tropical in 12 years, the entire earth would be dead soon after, and the whole man-made mess would be punctuated by the earth falling into the sun.

The story turned out to be a hoax, but it caught the attention of many and dominated the headlines for weeks. Man's activities could be dangerous indeed.


The
‘Great Horse Manure Crisis of 1894’ struck later in the century, involving the mathematically precise discovery that using the current mode of transportation, at the current rate of production, the streets of London would be under nine feet of horse manure within 50 years. This was no hoax, occupying as it did centre stage in 1898 at the world’s first international urban planning conference in New York and leading urban planners to believe that cities would eventually become uninhabitable.

Apparently, the internal combustion engine came along just in time to save doomed urbania.


It was only in the late 20th and early 21st centuries that more seriously existential predictions, allegedly backed by “science,” grew in scope to become terminal to humankind, firing the imagination of both politicians and the public.

There are of course periodic lesser apocalii hovering around the mediasphere vying for attention from time to time. 

For example, peak oil, popular around the turn of the millennium just before the world became awash in new discoveries of oil ...  depletion of resources, made famous in the 1972 Club of Rome report that breathlessly announced resource depletion and associated economic collapse by the end of the 20th century ... and the ozone hole, the scare de jour of the 90s that, at least according to futuristic Hollywood movies of the day, would force us to slather on blue sunscreen if we were foolish enough to venture outside.

And of course, Y2K, in which technology developed for the wrong century would do us in if we were in an elevator or airplane at midnight on December 31, 1999. But other than outliers like an arbitrary asteroid strike, they are generally second tier apocalii, bad enough to make life miserable for sure, but not enough to cause extinction.

Nuclear winter, the population bomb, and climate change are the great man made apocalyptic scares of our era, even though two of them have receded into background noise at the moment in favour of the more malleable and comprehensive “climate change,” a phenomenon in which causation of human agency is not only an unfalsifiable thesis (meaning it can be neither proven false nor proven correct), but fits every conceivable narrative.

If there’s floods, it’s climate change. If there’s droughts, it's climate change. Rain, snow, sunny days, hurricanes, annually calving ice caps, forest fires, pine beetles, the inconveniently non-existent extinction of polar bears, and even the Syrian civil war have variously been blamed on the effects of climate change. Everything proves it and it's all very, very bad.

To make it even more thrilling, its own extremists can fairly easily turn it into the end times by means of pseudo-scientific-sounding babble, with such horridly Brobdingnagian consequences as “cascading tipping points” and “climate feedbacks” leading to a “runaway greenhouse effect” and “hothouse climate state” which will turn earth into a Venus-like planet, stripped of its atmosphere, swirling with ghastly nastiness in a fiery Danse Macabre.

It's the perfect apocalypse!


— Scott Anderson, resides in Vernon, and provides comments and analysis from a bluntly conservative point of view.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Budget 2027: After a Decade of Decline, NDP Budget Delivers an Assault on Seniors, Working Families, and Small Businesses

Peter Milobar, BC Conservative Finance Critic, condemned the NDP government’s latest budget as the result of a decade of decline that has left British Columbians broke, unsafe, and paying more for less.   “After ten years of NDP mismanagement, this budget is an assault on seniors, working families, and the small businesses that drive our economy,” said Milobar. “The NDP have turned their back on the people working hardest to make ends meet and the seniors who built this province.” Milobar pointed to a new $1.1 billion annual income tax increase and warned that the government is piling new costs onto households already struggling with affordability.   “This government keeps asking British Columbians for more, while delivering less,” Milobar said. “The question people are asking is simple: Where has all the money gone?” Milobar noted that BC has gone from a surplus in the first year of NDP government to a projected deficit of more than $13 billion this year, while prov...

WARD STAMER -- Those are REAL forestry numbers, not just made-up numbers

The following is a condensed version of remarks Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s made, regarding Forestry, in the BC Legislature, on Tuesday afternoon (02/24/2026)   Let’s talk a little bit, when we talk about Budget 2026, about the forest industry, which is near and dear to my heart. Forestry remains one of British Columbia’s foundational industries. It’s a pillar that built this province. Entire communities depend upon it. Interior towns, northern communities, Vancouver Island regions, the Kootenays, the Lower Mainland, with manufacturing facilities in Surrey and Maple Ridge, just to name a few — everywhere in BC is touched by forestry. One word that was not mentioned in Budget 2026 was forestry. That’s a shame, an incredible shame. It wasn’t an oversight – it was intentional. This government has driven forestry into the ground .... INTO THE GROUND! We can talk a little bit about some of the initiatives that this government has brought forth, to try to resurrect ...

FORSETH -- Before anyone gets excited about one poll showing a candidate with a 25 percent lead, and 44 percent support overall, let’s give it a few more weeks

Is this based in reality -- how accurate are the numbers? In the past couple of weeks a couple of candidates, for the leadership of the BC Conservative Party, have been presenting polling results that they lead the pack – one even going so far as to say they have a lock on 44% of those who will be voting, and a twenty-five percent lead over the individual ranked second. I am going to say that this one, from Kerry-Lynne Findlay, is highly suspect. First of all the company conducting the poll, ERG National Research, is not a Member of Industry Bodies (the Canadian Research Insights Council), meaning they do not adhere to established industry standards for research, such as transparency, privacy, and methodological rigor. AI Overview states that ... based on alerts from the Canadian Research Insights Council (CRIC) and reports, ERG National Research should be treated with extreme caution regarding its reliability, and legitimacy, in conducting political polling. Before I even read this in...

Labels

Show more