Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- These resources do not exist solely for our economic benefit. They are part of an inter-connected web of biodiversity


A few months ago, I wrote on the whiteboard in my office boardroom "big bears, big fish and big trees." Those words have been there ever since. They are three world-famous icons of British Columbia.

In a previous post, I said that we are still acting like a resource colony. My critique of our decision-making process is that we have a culture in our province that the bountiful natural resources that bless our lands and oceans exist a) for the benefit of humans and, b) for the benefit of some other foreign or corporate interest.

Strip it and ship it!
When Europeans showed up in boats on the west coast of North America and established a presence here, corporations such as the Hudson's Bay Company began extracting wealth from "their" newly found territory. Forestry, mining, fishing and agriculture are the foundational industries of our province. It took little time for European settlers to begin stripping and shipping the wealth on behalf of, and under the authority of, the British Crown.

There is a perspective that trees, fish and wildlife, minerals and any other natural resources that we could possibly derive value from exist solely for human use. While it might be a gross over-generalization, this perspective is not shared by the Indigenous people in North America. Certainly not the W̱SÁNEĆ where I am from. These "resources" bless us with their utility, they are not our entitlement.

Big time!
In my initial meetings with legislative staff back in 2017, they asked me what my priorities are. "Big bears, big fish and big trees," I said. "It's my trifecta!"


I am proud of the BC Green Caucus role in advancing these issues over the last 24 months. Grizzly bears have more protection from trophy hunting than now than they have for many years. The issues around wild salmon was no where on the provincial radar at the beginning of the 40th Parliament and our work has been a critical force in elevating its prominence once again. This includes a $140 million fund to support the efforts to protect this critical species. Finally, we have begun our concerted effort to protect the ancient, giant trees in British Columbia.

While it's not a bad idea to stop and celebrate the distance we have come, it must be done with the understanding that we have a long way to go!

It's a big deal!
There have been a few attempts on social media to pass this work off as simply environmental activism. I have no problem with being a leader in environmental action. I'm proud of our work on behalf of these species critical to our province. However, it is far more than a monolithic stance for environmental values. There are social and economic issues as well.

The cost of degrading our environment, increasing impacts of storms, weakening the social fabric and well-being of our people and communities are all substantial concerns. In addition, it is a mistake to underestimate the economic opportunities of tourism for bear viewing, ancient forest visits and sport fishing.

Finally, to make the most of the limited resources we have access to, we should be rapidly moving to diversified, value-added manufacturing sectors founded on innovation.

It's time to change the culture in British Columbia.

These resources do not exist solely for our economic benefit. They are part of an inter-connected web of biodiversity. Our survival requires the biodiversity to remain intact. The colonial approach of our past is not sustainable.

Balancing the environmental, social and economic needs of our province will require a shift in our cultural paradigm away from extracting and exporting. Embracing the economy that got us here is easy and politically safe.

Tinkering around the edges will not be enough, what we need is a transformative vision with a thoughtful, organized and well-designed transition to support people and communities.



Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. 

Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. 

He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...

Labels

Show more