Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- These resources do not exist solely for our economic benefit. They are part of an inter-connected web of biodiversity


A few months ago, I wrote on the whiteboard in my office boardroom "big bears, big fish and big trees." Those words have been there ever since. They are three world-famous icons of British Columbia.

In a previous post, I said that we are still acting like a resource colony. My critique of our decision-making process is that we have a culture in our province that the bountiful natural resources that bless our lands and oceans exist a) for the benefit of humans and, b) for the benefit of some other foreign or corporate interest.

Strip it and ship it!
When Europeans showed up in boats on the west coast of North America and established a presence here, corporations such as the Hudson's Bay Company began extracting wealth from "their" newly found territory. Forestry, mining, fishing and agriculture are the foundational industries of our province. It took little time for European settlers to begin stripping and shipping the wealth on behalf of, and under the authority of, the British Crown.

There is a perspective that trees, fish and wildlife, minerals and any other natural resources that we could possibly derive value from exist solely for human use. While it might be a gross over-generalization, this perspective is not shared by the Indigenous people in North America. Certainly not the W̱SÁNEĆ where I am from. These "resources" bless us with their utility, they are not our entitlement.

Big time!
In my initial meetings with legislative staff back in 2017, they asked me what my priorities are. "Big bears, big fish and big trees," I said. "It's my trifecta!"


I am proud of the BC Green Caucus role in advancing these issues over the last 24 months. Grizzly bears have more protection from trophy hunting than now than they have for many years. The issues around wild salmon was no where on the provincial radar at the beginning of the 40th Parliament and our work has been a critical force in elevating its prominence once again. This includes a $140 million fund to support the efforts to protect this critical species. Finally, we have begun our concerted effort to protect the ancient, giant trees in British Columbia.

While it's not a bad idea to stop and celebrate the distance we have come, it must be done with the understanding that we have a long way to go!

It's a big deal!
There have been a few attempts on social media to pass this work off as simply environmental activism. I have no problem with being a leader in environmental action. I'm proud of our work on behalf of these species critical to our province. However, it is far more than a monolithic stance for environmental values. There are social and economic issues as well.

The cost of degrading our environment, increasing impacts of storms, weakening the social fabric and well-being of our people and communities are all substantial concerns. In addition, it is a mistake to underestimate the economic opportunities of tourism for bear viewing, ancient forest visits and sport fishing.

Finally, to make the most of the limited resources we have access to, we should be rapidly moving to diversified, value-added manufacturing sectors founded on innovation.

It's time to change the culture in British Columbia.

These resources do not exist solely for our economic benefit. They are part of an inter-connected web of biodiversity. Our survival requires the biodiversity to remain intact. The colonial approach of our past is not sustainable.

Balancing the environmental, social and economic needs of our province will require a shift in our cultural paradigm away from extracting and exporting. Embracing the economy that got us here is easy and politically safe.

Tinkering around the edges will not be enough, what we need is a transformative vision with a thoughtful, organized and well-designed transition to support people and communities.



Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. 

Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. 

He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FORSETH -- Given the noted infractions of this agreement with OneBC leader Dallas Brodie, I request the Party immediate suspend the leadership campaign of Yuri Fulmer

I have personally emailed the following to the Board and Administration of the Conservative Party of BC:   TODAY (03/30) Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the Conservative Party of BC, made a pact with ONEBC leader Dallas Broldie, that if he is elected will commit the Conservative Party to the following. Specifically, the pact states : This Memorandum of Understanding outlines the definitive electoral and governing alliance that will be executed upon Yuri Fulmer’s election as Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia OneBC Party commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in 88 of British Columbia’s 93 electoral districts. In exchange, the Conservative Party of BC, under the leadership of Yuri Fulmer, commits to not nominating or authorizing candidates in five (5) specific electoral districts . OneBC will be the sole standard-bearer for the right in those five districts. The specific ridings will be determined through mutual negotiation and fin...

Delays to the replacement of the Red Bridge? Kamloops North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer says they are, “Totally Unacceptable.”

I think it’s totally unacceptable that on one hand the Ministry of Transportation and Transit (MoTT) is saying they’re going to be responsible for putting together multiple replacement options with public engagement, and then in the same breath they're saying, ‘Oh, and by the way, we're going to start our geotechnical environmental and archaeological site assessments on both sides of the river, possibly beginning this summer.’ According to Stamer, that should already have been done. “Obviously, we're pretty sure it will be in the same location because there's really no other place to put it. So, if you're going to put in a bridge, you think that at least you'd be doing the archaeological assessments first off”, stated Stamer.   “If it's determined it has to be a free-span bridge, and it can't have anything or very minimal impact in the riverbed, they should already be determining that. It would help in the design, wouldn't it?” Stamer indicated...

Your government has a gambling problem (Troy Media)

Provinces call it “revenue,” but it looks a lot like exploitation of the marginalized The odds of winning Lotto Max are about 1 in 33 million. You’re statistically more likely to be struck by lightning than to win it. But your government is betting that statistics won’t hold you back; they’re counting on it. Across Canada, provincial governments not only regulate gambling, they also maintain a monopoly on lottery and gaming by owning and operating the entire legal market. That means every scratch card is government-issued, gambling odds are government-set, casino ads are government-funded and lottery billboards are government-paid. And these are not incidental government activities. They generate significant revenues that governments have powerful incentives to expand, not constrain. It would be one thing for our governments to encourage us to engage in healthy activities. We can quibble about whether the government should be trying to convince us to be more active or eat more vegetabl...

Labels

Show more