Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

With another hot summer ahead, and what sound like another bad fire season, this was very alarming. There were JUST UNDER 100 FINES for mishandling burning substances, and the use of fire when banned


On Tuesday (May 28th) the BC government released its quarterly environmental enforcement summaries for the third and fourth quarters of 2018. 

The summaries detail a total of 1,728 environmental enforcement actions taken by the provincial government during this time period, resulting in just under $900 thousand in penalties and fines.

In total, thee issued 246 orders, administrative sanctions, court convictions, and administrative penalties issued ... plus 2,412 violation tickets.  Most frequent violations were for actions that were in violation of the Wildlife Act (1,040), the Fisheries Act (375), and the Off-Road Vehicle Act with 344 violations.

Fines for these offenses totaled $1,092,465 in fines in 2018.

Some of the violations however would surprise you.  For example, there were MULTIPLE tickets handed out, through-out the province, due to individuals driving with a loaded fire arm in their vehicle ... failure to comply with Angling, hunting, firearm violations, failure to stop a vehicle and provide information to an officer ... illegal discharging litter and/or waste – this also included discharging waste from recreational vehicle ... multiple violations for operating unlicensed off-road vehicles ... NOT ONLY selling meat from wild game, but ALSO the selling LIVE wildlife.

With another hot summer ahead ... and what sounds like another bad fire season ... this was very alarming.  BC conservation officers issued tickets related to activities that could spark a wildfire, and that resulted in just under 100 fines handed out for the mishandling of burning substances, and the use of fire when banned. 

In the face of one of the worst fire seasons in British Columbia’s history, one which saw more than 1.3 million hectares burned, fines for violations that could start a wildfire were $1,150 each ($108,900 in total).

BC saw one of the worst fire seasons in history,
with more than 1.3 million hectares burned
Others environmental violations included dozens for the use of illegal salmon fishing methods including prohibited gear, or with prohibited bait ... there were Stop Work Orders issued due to the unauthorized storage and deposition of fill materials within the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) ... orders were issued in response to runoff water causing soil erosion and degradation ... and again of concern was the fact that orders were issued for failing to make sure vessels and equipment, from which ignitable vapours could be discharged, were safely vented to the atmosphere

Also troubling were a large number of orders issued in response to non-compliance with previously issued orders and conditions regarding the environment.  These included continued contamination of groundwater ... along with an order requiring initiation of abandonment work, in accordance with regulations under the Oil and Gas Activities Act -- just to name two.


Then there were also serious concerns including failure to comply with a waste discharge permit issued under the Environmental Management Act for a kraft pulp mill, which required bivalent sulphur discharges to not exceed the average hourly limit specified in the permit ... or what could be considered minor ones such as trespassing on enclosed land or premises, or engaging prohibited activity – or the illegal cutting, removing or destroying of timber from crown lands.

Then there were the failures.  Failure to comply ... failure to produce documents and identification ... failure to obey signs ... and failure to pay park fees for camping.

Currently, nearly 33,000 enforcement actions have been published in the summary and entered into the ministry’s environmental violations database.

Enforcement actions of note, during this period, include:

  • Radium Resort Group was fined twice – once for introducing waste-causing pollution and second for open burning of prohibited construction materials. Total of the two fines equaled $200,000, and of that total, $190,000 was directed to Habitat Conservation Trust Fund. 
  • Mackenzie Pulp Mill Corporation received three violation penalties, for a total of $81,100 for failure to maintain a recovery boiler and failing to comply with permit limits for bivalent sulphur compounds and particulate matter 
  • Canadian Pacific Railway Limited received a penalty for $31,500 for to comply with the terms of a waste discharge permit in Golden, which required the company to ensure that wastewater discharged from a pair of treatment plants met standards for biochemical oxygen demand, pH levels and toxicity 
  • Savage Creek Golf Course Ltd. received a penalty of $70,000 for significantly exceeding fill-level maximums, while developing an 18-hole Richmond golf course expansion in the Agricultural Land Reserve.


You can click here for a full list of environmental enforcement violations
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'Very good news' that Supreme Court will hear B.C. mineral claims case, Eby says

The BC government needs clarity from the Supreme Court of Canada on a landmark mineral rights claim, Premier David Eby says. But the lawyer representing the challenger says that they would have preferred the province respect the lower court's decision. Eby said Thursday it is very good news that the court will hear its appeal of a ruling that found the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the provincial mineral claims regime are "inconsistent." The BC Court of Appeal ruled in December that the provincial Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA, should be "properly interpreted" to incorporate the UN declaration into the laws of B.C. with immediate legal effect. That ruling set off the appeal from the province amid concerns that it could cause economic uncertainty ... CLICK HERE for the full story 
Post a Comment
Read more

EBY OFFSIDE WITH NATIONAL INTEREST AS CARNEY AND SMITH BUILD BC'S ECONOMIC FUTURE WITHOUT HIM ~~ BC Conservatives

IMAGE CREDIT :  CBC News   Prime Minister Mark Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a landmark agreement today committing Ottawa to designate a new pipeline to BC's west coast as a project of national interest by October 1, 2026, with construction approval targeted for September 1, 2027. The deal pairs the pipeline with a new industrial carbon pricing framework and a fall 2027 construction start. British Columbia, the province where the pipeline ends, where the jobs would land, and where the export terminal would be built, was nowhere at the table. "This is a nation-building deal, and the BC NDP have been locked out of the room," said Trevor Halford, Interim Leader of the Official Opposition.  "While the Prime Minister and the Premier of Alberta were doing the hard work of growing the Canadian economy, the NDP is on the sidelines calling this pipeline a 'fiction' and an 'energy vampire.'  He chose petulance over partnership, and now BC ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kamloops - North Thompson BC Conservative MLA Ward Stamer speaks to Bill 20 — K’ómoks Treaty Act

The following is a condensed version of Kamloops – North Thompson MLA Ward Stamer’s remarks, to the BC Legislature, on the afternoon of Tuesday May 19th : I rise today to continue remarks on Bill 20, the K’ómoks treaty, and to address what I believe are some of the most important constitutional, democratic and governance concerns facing this Legislature today. At the centre of this debate are two major issues. First, unresolved overlapping territorial boundaries tied to this treaty process. And second, the growing legal and political consequences arising from the provincial government’s implementation of the Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, more commonly known as DRIPA. Much of the government’s defence on DRIPA rests upon references to the United Nations declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples, commonly known as UNDRIP. And this is where we must begin having a more honest and mature conversation in this province. UNDRIP was never originally designed to function ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Labels

Show more