Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- For the most part, governments are too indolent to bother countering a court decision striking down law as unconstitutional


Judge made law ... I cringe whenever I hear the term. In one role or another I have been involved in contract law for over half my life. 

Our constitution is a contract between governments we created, and the people. Like any other contract, it is open to interpretation, which is exacerbated by its age – the language in use 150 years ago is not the language we are familiar with today. 

Many issues we face today did not exist when the BNA Act was written.

The term “judge made law” is popular but based on misinformation. The role of the courts is to interpret the laws of the land as best as they can.  Very often laws are unclear. That leads to variations in interpretation. 

When judges strike down a law as unconstitutional, in whole or in part (usually the latter) the result is not ‘judge made law’. 

The decision of a court is open to appeal and a decision can be overturned at a higher level. Governments have the option to appeal. More importantly, governments also have two other options:
  1. They can amend the law to clarify intent and make the law compliant with the constitution; or
  2. In some cases, they can invoke the ‘notwithstanding clause’ to counter a court decision.
For the most part, governments are too indolent to bother countering a court decision striking down law as unconstitutional. It is an abdication of responsibility for governments to throw up their hands and say: “The courts have decided”. 

That is rubbish. 


We elect politicians to govern and enact law on our behalf. We have courts to ensure the laws made are within the constitutional powers of legislators. When our courts decide that legislators have badly framed a law and strikes down, the ball is in the legislators’ court.

It is the duty and responsibility of legislators to remove the offending legislation from our body of law or replace it with acceptable legislation or to invoke the ‘notwithstanding clause’. 

Doing nothing is not an option but is what has happened in a growing number of cases.

I would not care to live in a nation that does not have an independent judicial overview of legislation. Without that, we are vulnerable to tyranny. Independent judicial review of law is essential in a democracy and the difference between democratic and autocratic governance.

That is why political interference in the administration of justice is abhorrent and unacceptable. It is also why the SNC-Lavalin affair must not be allowed to die without a full investigation. 

We must never allow legislators to interfere with the independence of our justice system. That independence is our protection against the serfdom of tyranny.

Apparently, keeping your nest clean is something we teach our grandchildren but is lost on politicians who lust for power.  

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stamer: Hope for Forestry Completely Shattered After Another Provincial Review Driven by DRIPA

IMAGE CREDIT:  Provincial Forestry Advisory Council Conservative Critic for Forests Ward Stamer says the final report from the Provincial Forestry Advisory Council confirms the worst fears of forestry workers and communities; instead of addressing the real issues driving mill closures and job losses, the NDP has produced a report that ignores industry realities and doubles down on governance restructuring. Despite years of warnings from forestry workers, contractors, and industry organizations about permitting delays, regulatory costs, fibre access, and the failure of BC Timber Sales, the PFAC report offers no urgency, no timelines, and no concrete action to stop the ongoing decline of the sector. “ This report completely shatters any remaining hope that the government is serious about saving forestry ,” said Stamer.  “ We didn’t need another study to tell us what industry has been saying for years. While mills close and workers lose their livelihoods, the NDP is focused on re...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH – My question is, ‘How do we decide who is blue enough to be called a Conservative?’

How do we decide who’s blue enough to be a Conservative? AS OF TODAY (Friday January 30 th ), there are now eight individuals who have put their names forward to lead the Conservative Party of British Columbia. Having been involved with BC’s Conservatives since 2010, and having seen MANY ups and downs, having 8 people say “I want to lead the party” is to me, an incredible turn-around from the past. Sadly, however, it seems that our party cannot seem to shake what I, and others, call a purity test of ‘what is a Conservative’. And that seems to have already come to the forefront of the campaign by a couple of candidates. Let me just say as a Conservative Party of BC member, and as someone active in the party, that frustrates me to no end. Conservatives, more than any other political philosophy or belief, at least to me, seems to have the widest and broadest spectrum of ideals.   For the most part, they are anchored by these central thoughts --- smaller and less intru...
1 comment
Read more

Labels

Show more